Why is the Samoan Measles narrative relevant today?
There was a supposed outbreak of measles in Samoa in September 2019.
The story provided to the World Press was that a child on holidays from New Zealand unknowingly had created an epidemic.
A ‘case’ of measles had been reported in the hospitals, which was taken to mean a spread had occurred.
This was reported to be “catastrophic” because there was a low uptake of vaccinations for Measles.
The uptake was hovering around 30% after the deaths of two babies after vaccination in 2018
Two nurses were charged with manslaughter for supposedly a mix-up in vaccine preparation.
The President had suspended the use of the vaccine for 10 months against the WHO recommendations.
The stage was set to play out a sequence for a Pandemic.
Media Hype created the fear.
Lockdowns created the political response.
Vaccines were touted as the solution.
But in reality there were about 5700 cases and 83 deaths.
The World was prepped and triggered into believing into the fear of contagion and the necessity of response.
Part of the response was the attack on those who questioned what was going on.
Edwin Tamasese, the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective,highlighted deaths in remote islands as occurring after the vaccine, thus challenging its effectiveness and safety .
The attack on Tamasese was part of an attempt to blame the death toll on mis-information from so-called ‘anti-vaxxers’.
Questions were then raised about the quality of the Indian vaccine.
At no time was RFK Jnr involved in these events.
The sequence of events coincidentally paralleled what ultimately occurred during COVID.
Conspiracy Theorists claim that the Samoan Measles ‘Outbreak’ was a trial run for all the COVID measures implemented on us only moths later.
Here is a collation of reports below from the most recent back to the early history:
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
Some media reports suggested that if Kennedy wins the appointment forHHS secretary, outbreaks like the one in Samoa will likely occur in the U.S.
“It was a disaster and it was caused in large part by RFK Jr.,” Hawaii Gov.Josh Green told MSNBCnews anchor Jonathan Capehart. “If he becomes our lead health official, you are going to see outbreaks like this in rural communities and cities across America. Children will die or have severe disabilities.”
However, a brief look into the timeline alone of events in Samoa shows that it “absolutely does not make sense” to blame themeaslesoutbreak on Kennedy, according to Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco.
So let’s then turn to Samoa (and neighbouring Fiji and Tonga) in 2019. Here is the timeline
April 2019 – MMR relaunched in Samoa after a pause on the vaccination program in 2018 after two vaccine-related deaths of children. The vaccine program was poorly received by the Samoan population and uptake was low. 1st Oct 2019 – UNICEF delivered 135,000 doses of measles vaccines to Fiji, 110,500 doses of measles vaccines to Samoa (as well as supplies of vitamin A) and 12,000 doses of measles vaccines to Tonga 18th Oct 2019 – Samoa declares a measles outbreak. 24th Oct 2019 – Tonga declares a measles outbreak. 7th Nov 2019 – Fiji declares a measles outbreak (archive here) 15th Nov 2019 – State of emergency declared in Samoa after 1000 cases and 15 deaths (of which 14 were children under five)
Immediately the propaganda machine moves into action making the world believe that the problem is the fact that Samoa – for one year only – had a lower vaccination rate than the neighbouring islands…
Government of Samoa
@samoagovt
A total of 32,743 vaccinations were completed before the Mass Vaccination Campaign. Since the activation of the Campaign on 20 November 2019, the Ministry has successfully vaccinated 17,088 individuals. Free vaccinations continue to be administered for the below target groups
The MMR vaccine used in Samoa is produced by the Serum Institute of India. It has been approved and certified by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is an attenuated (weakened) live virus vaccine that is sold under the brand name Tresivac.891011
Tresivac is contraindicated for people who are allergic to eggs, gelatin and neomycin or who have had a previous life-threatening reaction to any vaccine containing measles, mumps or rubella viruses. The Serum Institute’s MMR vaccine is also contraindicated for anyone who suffers from a chronic illness such as asthma or other breathing disorder, diabetes, kidney disease, or blood cell disorders such as anemia; or from severe immune suppression caused by disease (such as cancer, HIV, or AIDS), or who is receiving certain medicines such as steroids, chemotherapy or radiation. It is also contraindicated for pregnant women.12
According to the Serum Institute, there may be a problem with giving Tresivac to people with the following conditions: thrombocytopenia purpura (easy bruising or bleeding); active tuberculosis infection; a history of seizures; a neurologic disorder or disease affecting the brain (or if this was a reaction to a previous vaccine); and a weak immune system caused by disease, bone marrow transplant, or by using certain medicines or receiving cancer treatments. The vaccine might also cause problems for anyone who has received an immune globulin or other blood product within the past year or who has received a previous MMR vaccine within the previous 28 days.12
In October 2019, a one-year-old girl died two days after being administered Tresivac at a clinic in Cuba
In 2019, the leaders of Samoa closed its borders to travelers who did not have proof of vaccination records, including its own citizens. That hardline stance against measles means that for many American Baby Boomers who contracted measles as a child and have natural, true immunity and are either living in, or traveling to, Samoa must be given a jab against an infection their immune system had already conquered. The inoculation would not be solely for measles, but would also include a faulty attenuated mumps virus.
With more than fifty measles deaths claimed by the health experts in Samoa with the current outbreak, what is sadly no longer reported are thetwo deaths from MMR that rocked the Pacific Island nation in 2018. Two babies, less than two years of age, died shortly after receiving the MMR injection, causing an uproar. The Samoa prime minister “expressed his condolences” to the families and forced the country to temporarily pull the MMR vaccine from the market.
To the gasps of those who have had children injured by the MMR vaccine, Samoan authorities did not investigate what was wrong with the vaccine. Instead, authorities focused theirprobe on two nurses, charging them with two counts of manslaughter and declaring “nothing was wrong with the vaccine.” Month’s later, astill angry motherof one of the victims demanded “answers” for the death of her child. She clearly doesn’t believe the line of propaganda being sold to her as truth.
Within Samoa, malnutrition is a “growing health concern, particularly for children.”15Vitamin A treatment costs two or three pennies per dose9 and unlike vaccines, can be administered easily by parents or other providers because it does not require special training or refrigeration. While the vitamin A shipments by citizens to reduce complications in those with measles infections are disparaged in the press and social media, UNICEF has sent 30,000 vitamin A tablets along with 110,500 doses of measles containing vaccine to the island of Samoa.16
8 December, 2019 – Samoan Government Arrests “Anti-Vaxxer” as Measles Campaign Widens Dec. 5, 2019, the Samoan government reportedly arrested a “vocal antivaccination campaigner” and charged him with “incitement” as the government widens a mass measles vaccination campaign in the small South Pacific island nation of about 200,000 people. More than 4,300 measles cases with 63 deaths have been reported since the measles outbreak began in mid-October.1
Edwin Tamasese, a Samoananti-vaccinationactivist with no medical training who was also the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective,[8] was charged with “incitement against a government order”.[44]
He had posted online comments like “Enjoy your killing spree.”[8]He encouraged people to refuse immunisation, as he believed the vaccine caused measles,[45]and even discouraged life-saving antibiotics.[8]Tamasese faced up to two years in prison.[8]
Samoan government health officials have issued a recall of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine after two infants, a girl and a boy, died on July 6, 2018 just hours after being given the combination vaccine at Safotu Hospital on the island of f Savai’i in Samoa. 1234
Testing is underway by the Samoan Ministry of Health to determine if the vaccines caused the deaths of the babies. Local police are conducting a separate investigation into the two cases.1234
“We’ve ceased and sent out a directive to stop and cease all vaccinations of the children with the MMR,”1 said Samoa’s Director General of Health Leausa Toleafoa Dr. Take Naseri.
TV1 in Samoa is reporting that two infants have died within minutes of receiving the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Tala Fou brings you breaking news on the death of two young children both aged 1-year-old from the villages of Safotu and Sasina in Savaii. Both children died within minutes of being vaccinated with the MMR vacine at Safotu Hospital on Friday morning the 6th of July.
Our News Reporter Alisa Faamaoni met with both families in Savaii today. The parents of the first child Marietta and Samuelu Tuisuesue of Sasina explained in detail to Tala Fou that within three minutes of their 1-year-old daughter Lannacallystah Samuelu being injected with the MMR vaccine by a nurse she was dead. (Source.)
Clearly, the nutritional status of a country matters when it comes to lowering mortality from measles. This has certainly been the case in the United States, where measles mortality rates in the U.S. dropped by more than 90 percent during the first half of the 20th century prior to the introduction of the first measles vaccine in 1963.19
Deaths from measles had decreased from 21 deaths per 1000 reported cases during 1911-1912 to less than one death per 1000 reported cases in 1953-1962. This improved measles morality rate was owed to several factors unrelated to the measles vaccine, including better sanitation and living conditions, as well as better nutrition and improved access to health care.19
In their book, Dissolving Illusions, Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries noted that the incidence of measles was also on a downward trend—albeit a much slower rate than the decline in mortality—before the 1963 measles vaccine. 8We know, for example, that in 1954 there were 682,720 reported cases of measles in the U.S.13 This was followed by 555,156 cases in 1955; 611,936 in 1956; 486,799 in 1957; 763,094 in 1958; 406,162 in 1959; 441,703 in 1960; 423,919 in 1961; 481,530 in 1962; and 385,156 in 1963.13
While the number of reported cases of measles went up and down from year to year, the overall trend line was downward. In fact, the trend line had been going down since 1941, when the number of reported cases totaled 894,134.13
Interestingly, in 1964 (the year after the introduction of the first killed measles vaccine), the number of reported cases of measles actually went up to 458,083.13
Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries reasonably ask, “Was measles slowly becoming less prevalent anyway?”8
We know that measles can be sub-clinical 30 percent of the time, and the death rate had already plummeted. Like smallpox, was the disease slowly burning out? Was the rise in breastfeeding and improved nutrition contributing to fewer diagnosed cases? How many cases that were recorded as measles based on a clinical diagnosis really other viruses? Can we at all trust measles incidence statistics in the first place?8
If the trend continued as seen in the measles incidence graph, then measles incidence would have hit zero in the year 2000 without any vaccine program. Coincidentally, the year 2000 is the same year the CDC declared measles eliminated from the United States.8
A long history of measles vaccine failures For over 25 years, outbreaks have been reported in populations with vaccination rates exceeding 95 percent, undermining the mainstream assumption that vaccines are the singular solution to measles control.
Here is a documented historical record of such vaccine failures:
1985, Texas, U.S.: A study published in theNew England Journal of Medicine in 1987 analyzed a measles outbreak in Corpus Christi, Texas, where 99 percent of students were vaccinated and more than 95 percent were immune. The researchers concluded: “Outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”
1985, Montana, U.S.: An article in the American Journal of Epidemiology examined an outbreak of137 measles cases in Montana, despite a 98.7 percent vaccination rate. The researchers stated: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”
1988, Colorado, U.S.: A measles outbreak at a Colorado collegeinfected 84 students, even though over 98 percent had documented immunity due to strict vaccination policies. Researchers concluded that “measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”
1989, Quebec, Canada: Initially blamed on low vaccine coverage, a study published in theCanadian Journal of Public Healthconcluded: “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.”
1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A study published in theRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalfound that 76.4 percent of measles cases in this outbreak had been vaccinated before their first birthday.
1992, Cape Town, South Africa: A study in theSouth African Medical Journaldocumented an outbreak where 91 percent of children were vaccinated, and vaccine efficacy was only 79 percent. The researchers concluded that primary and secondary vaccine failure contributed to the outbreak.
These are just a handful of examples from an extensive body of literature documenting measles outbreaks occurring in highly vaccinated populations — clear evidence that vaccine-induced immunity is neither lifelong nor consistently effective.
This article is about measles alone. The combination MMR shot will be discussed separately.
Highlights
A long-held notion asserts that normal childhood illnesses ultimately strengthens the immune system; could that be true?
We’ve been taught to fear illness, but should we?
Shockingly, some scientists question what measles is.
What does it mean to stop or eliminate measles? Do we really want to?
Public health officials had come to a consensus that measles was a mild disease we should live with, but then decided measles was “important” when the vaccine was licensed, for the sole reason that we now had a product to sell for it.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax:
In 2020, we started investigating thevirus modeland came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-calledTobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properlycontrolled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement.
The narratives stemming from virology’s pseudoscience are now used to control populations in every possible way by keeping them in a state of fear. The phantom “viruses” and the invented “countermeasures” also enable vast transfers of wealth from the public to governments and their favoured friends, while allowingreal and sickening globalist agendasto roll on. It is therefore more important than ever to help more people see beyond the virus model, both for their own health and the future of humanity. While for some individuals this requires a scientific treatise such as Mark’sA Farewell to Virology, for many others they simply want to know, “if it’s not a virus, what’s making me sick then?” In this video, I answer that question with my top 40 reasons…
In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of theAlliance for Human Research Protectionsent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary“Never Again is Now Global”.
The task for our chapter was to “unmask the viral paradigm” and bidA Farewell to Virologyin non-technical language, while still citing scientific reports.
Our essay provides the overview of how the “pandemic” was staged and in some ways is a summary of part of our latest book,The Final Pandemic.
Jerm and Dr Tom Cowan discuss the COVID pandemic, questioning virus myths and medical authority. They highlight flawed virus isolation, unreliable PCR testing, and the body’s natural healing. They explore detoxification, challenge contagion theories, and debunk myths about bacteria, rabies, and the immune system. They stress the need for a scientifically literate society to build a healthier culture.
In this episode, Alec explores the misconceptions surrounding infectious diseases and reframes how we understand sickness. He examines the role of belief in health, gaps in virus research, and alternative reasons for individual and group illness. Discover insights into biofield interactions, the intelligence of water as it relates to our body, and how shifting your perspective can unlock new paths to wellness.
What if viruses don’t exist at all? – In this explosive interview, Dr. Tom Cowan — longtime physician and author of The Contagion Myth — makes the shocking case that everything we know about viruses and germ theory is wrong. – He says illness comes from toxins, not contagion — and mainstream science doesn’t want you to hear it. – Watch now and decide for yourself: medical truth-teller or dangerous heretic?
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 @KimIversenShow I spoke with Dr Tom Cowan who challenges the idea that viruses even exist. What he says may be controversial, but it will definitely get you thinking👇 https://x.com/KimIversenShow/status/1907086569544036726
This video, presented by Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., provides an in-depth analysis of the standard “Virus”-theory in the context of German New Medicine (GNM). More information is available athttps://learninggnm.com.
The findings of this investigation align with what is seen in the published literature. Find all of the official documents (FOIs) and emails with virologists here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
In this dynamic interview, Christine Massey shares her groundbreaking research into the issue of whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, as well as the broader question as to whether any “virus” has been proven to exist.
Christine Massey has a master’s degree in bio-statistics and has worked in cancer research.
The controversy over whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, is confusing to most people, but Ms. Massey pursued a route that was purely objective in doing this research. She submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to 213 medical institutions in 40 different countries asking them for documents that proved that the COVID virus has been purified and proven to exist. The responses she received from these institutions were absolutely shocking and draws into question everything they have been telling the public!
Another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature
My order was for:
All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. – that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged “avian influenza virus” (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in “host” cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or
2. – that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be “avian influenza virus” directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called “hosts”, with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or
3. – wherein the purported “genome” of any alleged “avian influenza virus” was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a “host” (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or
4. – that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported “avian influenza viruses”. My July 21, 2024FOIA orderfiled with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.
No one has valid scientific evidence to show that “avian influenza virus” H5N1 (or any other alleged “virus”) even exists. I challenge anyone to prove me wrong by citing such evidence.
Resources for farmers
For anyone approached by government agents who want to test for (imagined) viruses in their livestock, the Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) created anAction Alert formthat can be given to the agents before allowing them entry to the land. The form requires the agent(s) to identify themselves and to cite valid scientific evidence of the alleged virus in question, as well as contagion of the relevant illness and validation of the tests.
– As we delve into Alec Zeck’s 2.5-hour presentation, Reframing the Infectious Disease Paradigm* , we encounter a rigorous critique that challenges this paradigm’s foundations.
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
The work of Cowan and others are leading the way on questioning the foundations of virology.
‘Catching colds via viruses’ was studied for 44 years by the Common Cold Unit. Remains unproven.
“Novel pathogen” that “leaked” from a lab that spread around the world killing people in 2020. Disproved by the work of Rancourt.
Can they make stuff in labs that can make people sick or dead? Sure.
Can you use that to start a “pandemic” panic, with the media doing the rest. Sure.
But can they make something from genetic matter that “can pandemic.” I am confident the answer is no. It is not biologically plausible. So in that context, the biolab risk is wildly exaggerated for financial and industrial “pandemic preparedness” reasons.
30 July, 2024 – No “Virus” has ever been isolated No “Virus” has ever been isolated. A thread Here is one of 12 experiments in over 90 cultures, all with the same results. There is NO SAMPLE in these cultures and hence NO possibility of “a Virus” yet we see here CPE (Cell death) indicative of the presence of a “virus”.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture! The CDC was FOI’d and had no records.)
In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
In this video, we look at a Freedom of Information Act Request that the CDC provided that they say constitutes “proof” that Covid is a virus, is contagious and that it causes disease.
We go through source by source to show that this is inaccurate. We compare electron microscope images of “Covid” and show there are identical particles known to exist in cells already and researchers pointed this out in 2020.
We review the inappropriate controls used to compare “Covid” testing.
In this video, we continue with the discussion about antibodies, we look at the first acknowledged paper that references the idea of antibodies by Emil Von Behring and Kitashato Shibasaburu in relation to diptheria.
We briefly touch on their relationship to Robert Koch (who proposed Koch’s postulates). We then look at multiple failures of the diptheria vaccine that supposedly is conveying said antibodies to people. We then look at that fact that other entities, including vitamin C have been shown to neutralize diptheria.
So, if we haven’t isolated an antibody, and we know other things can neutralize diptheria, how can we come to conclusion that antibodies necessarily convey immunity?
In this video, we continue looking at the evidence for Antibodies going back to the time of Paul Ehrlich and explore the evidence of the “Side Chain” theory.
We briefly discuss the evidence of the effect of Vitamin C on both diptheria and tetanus to demonstrate that neutralization is not exclusive to the antibody idea.
We look at Ehrlich’s presentation to the Royal Society and some of his research works on “side chain” theory and find much of his experimental evidence is lacking.
In this video, we continue to look the supposed benefits anti bodies or the class of particles called Gamma Globulins that they supposedly constitute.
We will see that it appears there are some useful clinical applications for their use at times but we covered side effects, including potentially fatal ones, in the previous lecture.
We will touch on potential environmental exposures that could be causing symptoms expressed in agammaglobunemia which would been use of gamma globulins is indicated. We will cover electrophoresis as an isolating agent and how fragile a process this can be.
In this video, we finally discuss the origin of the supposedly “unique:” anti-bodies suchas IgG, IgM, and IgE etc., how ultracentrifugation is used to identify differences in anti bodies.
Yet we keep finding new sources of potential error but no reproducibility studies of old literature?
We see more examples of both antibodies and white blood cell counts not being sufficient to explain immunity. And finally we look at the side effect profile of administering these immunoglobulins.
This lecture is the culmination of several other lectures so reviewing the lectures on CPE, cDNA and the previous Renin, Hypertensin, and angiotensin lectures will be necessary to understand it.
We deconstruct the idea that ACE 2 is a membrane bound receptor. We will see that they did not do appropriate experiments to determine that Sars Cov 1 attached to ACE 2 and the problem compounds with Covid 19. We will see that despite multiple recommendations since 2020 to use ACE 2 blocker when we actually implement the practice there is no noticeable difference in “Covid” outcomes.
So, how can we say ACE 2 is the entry point for the virus into cells if in the real world when we use medications to block the receptor it does impact the disease at all?
In this video, we finally cover staining procedures for viewing images of virus in electron microscopes.
We review the work of Harold Hillman and his disputing of current views on electron microscope and the nature of artifacts in the slides.
We cover the staining process used on “Covid 19” that requires uranyl acetate and lead citrate, both of which have confirmed toxicity to kidney tissues which is what Covid virus images are tested against.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax: This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey
Because “they” (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearlydon’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
15 signs you might be in an abusive relationship [with governments and globalists as the abusers].
Take a moment and read the 15, considering how each applies re: the current world situation.
Increasing degrees of totalitarian control in our post COVID-19 ‘bio-security’ world is abuse on a global scale profoundly affecting both adults and children.
Exposure to extreme abuse arising from lockdowns, mask and vaccine mandates surveillance and coercion crushes a sense of personal value and worthiness.
Global predators , the perpetrators, systematically use a plethora of mass psychology strategies to create widespread unconditional obedience in order to further their plans as outlined in Lockstep, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and The Great Reset.
Being aware of the game plan of global control towards a centralized, technocratic world government allows us to transcend their psychological operations and build a future based on wisdom, compassion and personal power.
Nowadays, I am often asked how I could accurately predict the course of the pandemic, and my answer each time is: “All of this was just an escalation of what the industry had done previously.” As the years have gone by, the industry has become more and more brazen in pushing unsafe and ineffective medications onto the market and paying off the government to gaslight the injured parties rather than fulfilling its obligation to investigate and pull the harmful drugs.
I don’t think it’s farfetched to say that we, the people of the United States of America, have been gaslit.
Does this sound familiar? Lockdowns that keep you away from friends and loved ones? Losing your income and becoming dependent on handouts doled out by the government? Being censored and mocked when you say anything that is not in line with the official narrative? Being treated like a crazy conspiracy theorist who should be punished because of the harm you’re causing to others if you refuse to go along?
We were unprepared for the propaganda and manipulation that were inflicted on us. Consider this list of signs that a partner is being emotionally abusive, and ask yourself how many of these behaviors were reflected in the official response by government and public health leaders, and the media, during the pandemic
“In 1957 sociologist Albert Biderman developed a framework for understanding the methods foreign governments used to extract false confessions from American prisoners of war. It has come to be called Biderman’s Chart of Coercion. This is Biderman’s Chart as applied to how governments are using the same tactics in this fake pandemic to manipulate the masses.”
On March 19, 2020 (day before COVID pandemic declared): “California governor Gavin Newsom issues a statewide stay-at-home orderto slow the spread of COVID-19 instructing residents to only leave their homes when necessary and shutting down all but essential businesses.” This rapid-fire shock-and-awe battery upon the public consciousness was designed by behavioral psychologists to inflict trauma-based mind control, learned helplessness, hypnosis by confusion, and a worldwide Obedience-Prison-Conformity experiment on the . Tragically, most people failed or even zealously colluded before later becoming an amnesty-demander.
All vaccines and now gene therapy injectables, come with dubious safety and efficacy profiles. Pregnant women are particularly at risk.
The COVID-19 mRNA inoculations have been developed extremely quickly. The trials did not include pregnant women. Where is the evidence of safety?
The safety data will only become available as more and more pregnant women get the jab under ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ (EUA) or ‘Provisional Approval’.
The Phase 3 Trials are being rolled out as mass vaccination across the world. All who get vaccinated are subjects of experimental vaccines* never trialed on humans before.
* mRNA or adenovirus.
Pregnancy adverse events from the jab are generally not reported in hospital and are attributed to ‘getting COVID’!
Reporting systems such as VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) and DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications – Australia ) are purely voluntary and represent only 1-10% of actual adverse reactions in pregnant women .
Early research has been compromised and flawed due to conflicts of interest.‘Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons‘has twenty one authors, all of whom work for the CDC(Centre for Disease Control and Prevention) and/or the FDA (Food and Drug administration). Not one has declared the ‘red flag’ fatally flawed statistical errors hiding the seven-fold increase in spontaneous abortions after the COVID jab.
How did the researchers get away with manipulating the figures? 104 women out of 127 who received a COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester, had a spontaneous abortion: 82%.
They diluted the figures by claiming that those who had spontaneous abortions were part of the total count of all those who were pregnant (827). However, by definition, spontaneous abortions only occur up to week twenty of pregnancy. Beyond twenty weeks they are classed as stillbirths.
The poor quality of results was compounded by the fact that more than 3000 women were never followed up. Additionally there was no data published on ability to conceive post-injection.
The onus is on pharmaceutical corporations and health departments to prove safety. The only way to achieve this is by voluntary fully informed consent of pregnant women, or women planning pregnancy in these Phase 3 trials. This is not happening.
Absence of proof of safety does not exclude the possibility of harm!
Typically the CDC see a 2 fold increase as a danger signal But our studies show a 1500 fold increase in menstrual abnormality A 58 fold in Miscarriages and a 38 fold in Fetal death VAERS reproductive reports:
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
I interviewed fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr James Thorp recently; he has been one of the very few medical providers for pregnant women and babies, to have raised the alarm about massive damage to women and babies via the mRNA injection. Theinterview, in a transcript that I have edited for clarity, is one of the most important exchanges of our time.
Dr McLinden recently spoke at length with Graham Hood on his Club Grubbery on social media. Hood said “dozens of doctors” were now approaching his group. McLinden had sounded warnings to pregnant women about potential miscarriages following mRNA shots. His personal research revealedpregnancy losses in up to 74% of the vaccinated women in his practice – 4.6 to 14.8 times higher than typical normal rates of loss which range from 5 to 16% (58 – 69% above typical losses).
Let me walk you through a masterclass in how to bias a study so thoroughly that even a real risk can disappear. Not with fraud, not with data tampering—just good old-fashioned design flaws, all pointing in one direction. (I will leave it to the reader to decide on this). We’re going to talk about a study recently published in JAMA Network Open by Bernard et al. (2025)1, which claims that getting an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the first trimester of pregnancy isn’t associated with birth defects. 1. First-Trimester mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Risk of Major Congenital Anomalies
You might have heard this result and thought, “Well, that’s reassuring.”
Let me show you why it’s not.
The Setup: A Live-Birth Only Study
The researchers looked at over 527,000 live-born infants in France, comparing those whose mothers got an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester with those who didn’t. They then looked at the rate of major congenital malformations (MCMs) and said: “No difference.”
Their conclusion? The vaccine isn’t teratogenic. It doesn’t cause birth defects.
Here’s the problem: They only looked at live births. That means any fetus with a severe enough defect to lead to termination or fetal death is simply not counted. And guess what? The most severe defects—the ones most likely to show up if a vaccine did have a harmful effect—are the ones most likely to lead to termination or stillbirth.
Let me repeat that: They deleted the most relevant cases before the analysis even started.
Over a century of industrial spin and institutional bias has skewed how we view health, but I’m convinced we need to start with the truth that newborns arrive perfectly equipped—no need for vitamin K shots or a barrage of vaccines to shield them from so-called viruses. This new book Pregnancy and Vaccinationdigs into this, exposing how medicine, starting in 1997, ditched the precautionary principle the “Golden Rule of Pregnancy” to push untested vaccines on expectant mothers, exposing their babies to neurotoxins like aluminum and mercury.
I will start with the key findings and then try to explain the methodology in plain language. The paper is based on analysis of electronic health records (EHR) from one of Israel’s largest health insurance funds. For those of you who would rather readthe paper itself, here’sa PDF.
Key findings
Here are the key findings (as summarised ina post on X).
Women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) had a higher-than-expected number of foetal losses:
Dose 1 = 3.9 more per 100 women [43% higher than expected: 13 vs 9]
Dose 3 = 1.9 more per 100 women [19% higher than expected: 12 vs 10]
A major study has been used to reassure pregnant women that Covid-19 vaccines are safe. But the data behind the claim are fatally flawed.
– The thalidomide disaster, diethylstilboestrol (DES), and other cautionary tales have shown what can happen when scientific rigour is sidelined in favour of commercial interests. So, when a new study published in Pediatrics – the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics – claimed that Covid-19 vaccination in early pregnancy was safe, it came with an air of authority and reassurance. Scratch the surface of this study, and something starts to unravel. Not only are the data unverifiable and privately sourced, but the study contains a fatal flaw that renders its conclusions virtually meaningless. The fatal flaw: The study analyzed 78,052 pregnancies that ended in a live birth—but left out 20,341 pregnancies that ended in miscarriage or other non-live outcomes. That’s not a minor oversight.
Doctors and researchers allege a disturbing rise in miscarriages linked to COVID vaccines—and a cover-up to keep it quiet.
HOUSTON — This story was brought to my attention by Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and it’s a gut punch we need to feel.
She has done excellent work blowing the whistle on vaccine safety and what she has uncovered here, by way of the March 24, 2025 article by Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake on America Out Loud News, is bone-chilling.
It’s called “Behind the Numbers: Miscarriages Post-COVID Shots”and it sets out a reality the CDC and Big Pharma don’t want us to know: miscarriages have soared after COVID-19 vaccines started rolling out. This isn’t conspiracy talk. It’s data, experience, and a wake-up call. McCullough and Leake go further, citing a 2021 study byShimabukuro in the New England Journal of Medicinethat was pulled for massaging the truth. It masked the true risk of miscarriage, they say, by avoiding later-term losses and then displaying a sanitized 12.6 percent rate that doesn’t tell the full tale.
2 April, 2025 – From 4% to 30%: OB-GYN Reveals Alarming Miscarriage Surge After COVID Shots
Despite assurances from health authorities, recent evidence and expert testimonies suggest that vaccines given during pregnancy pose a significant risk to both mother and baby. This article covers the following:
On April 23, 2021, during a high-profile White House COVID-19 press briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced CDC’s new recommendation that all pregnant women receive the COVID-19 “vaccine.” Apparently basing this recommendation on a misleading CDC study published just days before, Walensky publicly declared that the vaccines appeared to be safe for pregnant women.
Newly emerged data has revealed an alarming surge in major birth abnormalities among mothers who have received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The shocking discovery was revealed in Pfizer’s own pregnancy trial data.
Pfizer recentlyupdated the resultsof their randomized clinical trial of the Covid injections on pregnant women.
The clinical trial, IDNCT04754594, is entitled: “To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Against COVID-19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years of Age and Older.”
The results from the trial wereanalyzedby MIT computer scientist and data expert Steve Kirsch.
Kirsch, the inventor of the optical computer mouse, is the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).
After breaking down the clinical trial results, Kirsch made a chilling discovery.
Kirsch found that mothers who received a Covid mRNA “vaccine,” before or during their pregnancy, were over four times more likely to give birth to a baby with major congenital abnormalities.
The data reveals that “vaccinated” mothers had a stunning 4.2X higher rate of Adverse Events of Special Interest(AESI)when compared to unvaxxed moms.
A few weeks ago, I wrote an article about how pregnant women are being advised to get the whooping cough vaccination during pregnancy.
I explained that although doctors and health care professionals were portraying the whooping cough vaccination as a single vaccine, in reality there is no such thing as a single vaccine for whooping cough and that instead they are being given ADACEL, a vaccination for Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertusis (whooping cough).
During my research, I discovered that according to the ADACEL information sheet, Adacel may be causing a higher percentage of miscarriage and babies born with serious birth defects.
Answer: just remove most-likely-to-miscarry vaccinated women from the data!
Anewly published studythat intended to prove that COVID vaccines are safe for women trying to become pregnant is raising more questions than it answers.
The study appears to intentionally exclude women most likely to experience miscarriage, but only among the vaccinated cohort!
Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OB-GYN who has been involved in 8,000 pregnancies, details how miscarriage rates have doubled year-over-year since the introduction of the COVID-19 injections.
Pfizer had completed their randomized study but instead of enrolling the planned 4,000 moms-to-be, they enrolled 683 and only 161 women received 2 vaccines and 159 got placebo & completed the blinded period.
Why did the trial stop enrolling when it was so tiny?
Could it be they found a concerning signal and did not want to chance letting it become significant?
Could it have beenthis 👇🏻? That 5.1% of infants of vaccinated moms had adverse events of special interest (AESI) between birth and 6 months while only 1.3% of infants in the control arm had AESIs?
Because they limited the size of the trial, Pfizer can always say they didn’t find a significant signal. But if they don’t look, how can they find it?
Also, why are there only 156 infants in the vaccine arm and 159 in the placebo arm when 161 women received the vaccine and 159 received the placebo (and completed the blinded period)?
Pfizer Post-Marketing Report by Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt
Twenty-eight deaths of either a fetus or neonate happened to women in the vaccinated group (124 women). So, 23% of the vaccinated mothers had fetuses or newborns who died.
These “losses” were described as spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) or various other terms which mean death of the fetus or baby.
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
“There’s a section of the Pfizer documents in which Pfizer breaks down the adverse events and concludes that women sustain 72% of them,” she continued. “And of those — and these are Pfizer’s words — 16% are quote-unquote “reproductive disorders” compared to 0.49% for men. So they’re very focused on reproduction, on female reproduction.”
COVID vaccine induced antibodies passively transferred to neonates may subvert, damage natural innate antibobies from being ‘educated’, ‘trained’; neonates may be passively immunized to SARS-CoV-2 infection & the high-affinity vaccinal antibodies can outcompete infant’s innate antibodies for antigen.
Concentration of LNPs in ovaries, a doubled pregnancy early loss rate, and raised foetal abnormality rate across all measured categories indicate that designating a safe-in-pregnancy label (B1 category in Australia) was contrary to the available evidence.
Regulatory authorities knew that animal studies showed major red flags regarding both pregnancy loss and fetal abnormalities, consistent with the systemic distribution of the mRNA they had been hiding from the public.
While anybody with any level of capacity for rational thought knows by now that there is (and never was) any need for women to get vaccinated before or during pregnancy, many still assume that the vaccine likely does no harm to them.
At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection
At a rally outside the hospital, doctors launched an official complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, alleging conflicts of interest influencing their policies, decisions and statements made to the people of British Columbia
Scotland has also experienced an unusual rise in infant death rates; during September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births, up from an average of 2 per 1,000 births
As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
The CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics”
When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks’ gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%
“A re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results.”(Source)
“Early data from the v-safe surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the VAERS do not indicate any obvious safety signals with respect to pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with Covid-19 vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy”. The ‘elephant in the room’: COVID-19 vaccine had an 82% incidence of spontaneous abortion in the first trimester!
“In the table footnotes, the following content should have been appended to the double dagger footnote:
“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account forgestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”
“The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’gestation).”
“There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines” (2,198 – Source.)
“That means that following COVID-19 injections into child-bearing women for the past 11 months has seen a 50 X increase in ectopic* pregnancies compared to child-bearing women receiving vaccines for the past 30+ years.”
UseGoogle Translateto translate this article into English. Below are relevant translated excerpts:
Byram Bridle is Professor of Virology and Immunology at the University of Guelph, Canada. A few days ago, Bridal spoke toradio presenter Alex Piersonwith a serious warning about the genetically engineered Covid vaccines . Together with other colleagues in Japan, Bridle had submitted an inquiry to the local registration authority about the Freedom of Information Act – and received information aboutthe previously inaccessible animal test data on the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer and Biontech.
The data, in particular the pharmacokinetic overview tables, show that the mRNA nanoparticles do not remain locally at the puncture site in the muscle tissue, as assumed and claimed by the manufacturers, but reach the organs in sometimes dramatic concentrations…
Bridle warned, “We made a mistake. The spike protein is itself toxic and dangerous to humans. ”It is even transmitted to breastfed children through breast milk.
The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates in the blood for several days after vaccination.It accumulates as soon as it enters the blood and accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and, what is particularly worrying to me, it accumulates in fairly high concentrations the ovaries .
COVID-19 vaccinations for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy
COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy. Pregnant women who have already received a primary course should discuss with their doctor or vaccination provider whether a booster dose is required during their pregnancy.
Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are preferred for the primary course and for booster doses in pregnant women.
There is a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of ancestral-based (original) mRNA vaccines in pregnancy.2,3
2. Sadarangani M, Soe P, Shulha HP, et al. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: A Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2022;22:1553-64.
3. Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2273-82.
Are you a SCAD theorist? What? You don’t know about the SCAD construct? Well then you’d better join me for today’s deep dive on a modern classic of conspiracy realism, Conspiracy Theory in Americaby Lance deHaven-Smith.
“Conspiracy theory” is just a term the CIA weaponised for their propagandist to help them shut down any debate—about who shot JFK—by sticking the dismissive “conspiracy theorist” label on anyone who dared to question the US government’s official account. It really doesn’t mean anything more than that. Alleged “conspiracy theorists” are just people who question government narratives.
We need to normalize the words “CONSPIRACY THEORY”. It’s a tool used to dismiss conjecture, claims, charges, and admissions of conspiracies. There is no doubt that conspiracies happen. The trick is to try to determine whether individuals worked together to conspire to mislead the public on important issues.
We are a large and ever growing group of Americans who were previously healthy and have been seriously injured by the COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J as well as Astra Zeneca in the clinical trial stage in the United States).
In a study published June 29 in JAMA Cardiology, researchers described 23 cases of myocarditis in healthy military members who developed the condition within four days of receiving the Pfizer or Moderna COVID vaccines.
It comes from the AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten retirement home in Berlin-Spandau. There, within four weeks after the first vaccination with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine Comirnaty, eight of 31 seniors, who suffered from dementia but were in good physical condition according to their age before the vaccination, died.
” National Socialism was anti-Semitism. Apart from anti-Semitism, its character was that of a thousand tyrannies before it, with modern conveniences. Traditional anti-Semitism . . . played an important role in softening the Germans as a whole to Nazi doctrine, but it was separation, not prejudice as such, that made Nazism possible, themere separation of Jews and non-Jews” (116-117).”
August, 2021 – France this evening, as terraced restaurants require macron’s “covid passports”, the people brought their own picnics to the street, restaurants empty, street filled with free and happy families dining together 👌🏻
Technology expert Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., told The Defender that, under the guise of preserving freedom, a digital passport system “means restraints on movement and living for the unvaccinated and forced vaccination to participate in life.”
“Since Saturday, people in New Brunswick, Canada are now required to show proof of full vaccination in public. Failure to provide proof of full vaccination will result in citizens being barred from entering grocery stores to buy food,True Northreported.
This new provision was announced as part of the province’s “winter action plan,” which allows any business, including grocery stores, the right of denying entry to any unvaccinated food shopper.”
Who is pulling the strings? And what is their agenda? Whether you support Donald Trump or whether you see Trump as an ultra right wing misogynistic white supremacist, it should be very disturbing to see that Biden did not have the credible vote numbers and the election was deeply flawed and fraudulent.
Videos:
20 October, 2021 – Stolen Elections (Video One)
Website: Https://stolenelectionsfactscom A small team of patriots led by Retired CIA Agent, Gary Berntsen have rolled their sleeves up to gather the facts and witnesses to prove this remarkable sequence of events. Learn how your country and democracy has been in the process of being stolen since 2006. The problem is transnational in 72 countries. Venezuela, Cuba, China, Iran, Russia and Serbia have teamed up.
A man who incited a violent insurrection is unfit for office, we are told. That might be true — but Donald Trump did nothing of the sort.
President elect Donald Trump has no shortage of flaws. We know this because they have featured as lead stories in the corporate media for eight long years.
But if there’s one argument wielded as a silver bullet by Trump’s critics, it’s the January 6 insurrection narrative. It goes something like this:
On January 6, 2021 — one of the darkest days in American history — Donald Trump incited an insurrection against the United States government. By spreading lies about a stolen election, he provoked a violent mob to storm the Capitol and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. Trump’s attempted coup d’état caused the death of five people, showed a dangerous disregard for the rule of law and the Constitution, and sought to overturn the will of the American people.
The only problem with this story is that almost every detail is false.
Here are ten reasons to reject the claim that Donald Trump incited an insurrection on January 6.
9. Election Fraud
If January 6 protesters were not seeking to overthrow the government, what were they hoping to accomplish at Capitol Hill that day?
The answer is in Trump’s speech: he encouraged his supporters to call on Vice President Mike Pence to delay the certification of the 2020 election results and send them back to the states for further review.
Labelling Trump’s claims about election fraud as “lies” serves the insurrection narrative, but it fails to address the legitimate concerns of tens of millions of Americans.
According to Pew Research, 32% of Americans believe that “widespread illegal voting and fraud” was a major reason for Joe Biden’s election victory in 2020. Another poll from Marist/NPR/PBS found that almost 40 percent of Americans do not trust the results of that election. A Rasmussen poll was even worse, finding that 55% of likely voters believed cheating likely influenced the outcome of the election, with 39% saying it was “very likely”.
It’s not enough to blame Trump for convincing Americans that election fraud occurred. One in five mail-in-voters personally admitted to committing election fraud in 2020, according to a survey sponsored by the Heartland Institute.
Moreover, the states Joe Biden won by the narrowest of margins — just tens of thousands of votes — are also where election irregularities were widely reported. And curiously, Biden managed to lose the bellwether states of Florida and Ohio, along with 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and still win the election — a statistically implausible outcome.
Finally, the claim that Trump lost almost all his election-related lawsuits obscures the fact that the majority of his cases were dismissed on procedural grounds and were never assessed on their merits.
In summary, while the results of the 2020 election are yet to be thoroughly adjudicated in court, there are enough reasons to suspect significant fraud took place.
For those paying attention, it was plain to see that something was wrong with what went down in the early hours of 4 November 2020. Mysteriously appearing ballots, unexplained pauses in counting, mathematical improbabilities, a litany of eyewitness accounts of procedures not followed correctly – all these pieces of circumstantial evidence led many to conclude that that the dice were loaded, and to fear they may be loaded again in the future.
By MICHAEL SLOVANOS A 30-year US Navy and CIA veteran Gary Berntsen has blown the whistle on highly suspicious activities involving electronic vote counting companies worldwide.
Former Arizona Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters was sentenced Thursday to 8.5 years in prison for felony and misdemeanor charges for which she was found guilty this summer in connection with 2020 election security breach. Peters’ attorneys argued their client was trying to preserve voting records.
She admitted to using a county employee’s identity to let Hayes copy the hard drive of a ballot marking machine in May 2021 before a software update and to observe the update. The defense argued that Peters did this because the county wouldn’t allow her to have a county technology expert observe the software update.
Peters and her legal team have claimed that election information was deleted from the election equipment following the software update.
A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.
The Heartland Institutestudytried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 election results.
The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in Decembertthat revealedthat roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg listens as Alex Halderman, a University of Michigan computer science professor, shows how a voting machine could be hacked during a 2018 hearing. Halderman gave a similar demonstration Thursday in a trial before Totenberg to determine whether Georgia’s voting system is vulnerable to manipulation or programming errors. -All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.
Including Estimated “800,000 Ballot Applications Sent to Non-Qualified Voters” – Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization with Multiple Temporary Facilities in Several States
