Why is the Samoan Measles narrative relevant today?
There was a supposed outbreak of measles in Samoa in September 2019.
The story provided to the World Press was that a child on holidays from New Zealand unknowingly had created an epidemic.
A ‘case’ of measles had been reported in the hospitals, which was taken to mean a spread had occurred.
This was reported to be “catastrophic” because there was a low uptake of vaccinations for Measles.
The uptake was hovering around 30% after the deaths of two babies after vaccination in 2018
Two nurses were charged with manslaughter for supposedly a mix-up in vaccine preparation.
The President had suspended the use of the vaccine for 10 months against the WHO recommendations.
The stage was set to play out a sequence for a Pandemic.
Media Hype created the fear.
Lockdowns created the political response.
Vaccines were touted as the solution.
But in reality there were about 5700 cases and 83 deaths.
The World was prepped and triggered into believing into the fear of contagion and the necessity of response.
Part of the response was the attack on those who questioned what was going on.
Edwin Tamasese, the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective,highlighted deaths in remote islands as occurring after the vaccine, thus challenging its effectiveness and safety .
The attack on Tamasese was part of an attempt to blame the death toll on mis-information from so-called ‘anti-vaxxers’.
Questions were then raised about the quality of the Indian vaccine.
At no time was RFK Jnr involved in these events.
The sequence of events coincidentally paralleled what ultimately occurred during COVID.
Conspiracy Theorists claim that the Samoan Measles ‘Outbreak’ was a trial run for all the COVID measures implemented on us only moths later.
Here is a collation of reports below from the most recent back to the early history:
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
Some media reports suggested that if Kennedy wins the appointment forHHS secretary, outbreaks like the one in Samoa will likely occur in the U.S.
“It was a disaster and it was caused in large part by RFK Jr.,” Hawaii Gov.Josh Green told MSNBCnews anchor Jonathan Capehart. “If he becomes our lead health official, you are going to see outbreaks like this in rural communities and cities across America. Children will die or have severe disabilities.”
However, a brief look into the timeline alone of events in Samoa shows that it “absolutely does not make sense” to blame themeaslesoutbreak on Kennedy, according to Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco.
So let’s then turn to Samoa (and neighbouring Fiji and Tonga) in 2019. Here is the timeline
April 2019 – MMR relaunched in Samoa after a pause on the vaccination program in 2018 after two vaccine-related deaths of children. The vaccine program was poorly received by the Samoan population and uptake was low. 1st Oct 2019 – UNICEF delivered 135,000 doses of measles vaccines to Fiji, 110,500 doses of measles vaccines to Samoa (as well as supplies of vitamin A) and 12,000 doses of measles vaccines to Tonga 18th Oct 2019 – Samoa declares a measles outbreak. 24th Oct 2019 – Tonga declares a measles outbreak. 7th Nov 2019 – Fiji declares a measles outbreak (archive here) 15th Nov 2019 – State of emergency declared in Samoa after 1000 cases and 15 deaths (of which 14 were children under five)
Immediately the propaganda machine moves into action making the world believe that the problem is the fact that Samoa – for one year only – had a lower vaccination rate than the neighbouring islands…
Government of Samoa
@samoagovt
A total of 32,743 vaccinations were completed before the Mass Vaccination Campaign. Since the activation of the Campaign on 20 November 2019, the Ministry has successfully vaccinated 17,088 individuals. Free vaccinations continue to be administered for the below target groups
The MMR vaccine used in Samoa is produced by the Serum Institute of India. It has been approved and certified by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is an attenuated (weakened) live virus vaccine that is sold under the brand name Tresivac.891011
Tresivac is contraindicated for people who are allergic to eggs, gelatin and neomycin or who have had a previous life-threatening reaction to any vaccine containing measles, mumps or rubella viruses. The Serum Institute’s MMR vaccine is also contraindicated for anyone who suffers from a chronic illness such as asthma or other breathing disorder, diabetes, kidney disease, or blood cell disorders such as anemia; or from severe immune suppression caused by disease (such as cancer, HIV, or AIDS), or who is receiving certain medicines such as steroids, chemotherapy or radiation. It is also contraindicated for pregnant women.12
According to the Serum Institute, there may be a problem with giving Tresivac to people with the following conditions: thrombocytopenia purpura (easy bruising or bleeding); active tuberculosis infection; a history of seizures; a neurologic disorder or disease affecting the brain (or if this was a reaction to a previous vaccine); and a weak immune system caused by disease, bone marrow transplant, or by using certain medicines or receiving cancer treatments. The vaccine might also cause problems for anyone who has received an immune globulin or other blood product within the past year or who has received a previous MMR vaccine within the previous 28 days.12
In October 2019, a one-year-old girl died two days after being administered Tresivac at a clinic in Cuba
In 2019, the leaders of Samoa closed its borders to travelers who did not have proof of vaccination records, including its own citizens. That hardline stance against measles means that for many American Baby Boomers who contracted measles as a child and have natural, true immunity and are either living in, or traveling to, Samoa must be given a jab against an infection their immune system had already conquered. The inoculation would not be solely for measles, but would also include a faulty attenuated mumps virus.
With more than fifty measles deaths claimed by the health experts in Samoa with the current outbreak, what is sadly no longer reported are thetwo deaths from MMR that rocked the Pacific Island nation in 2018. Two babies, less than two years of age, died shortly after receiving the MMR injection, causing an uproar. The Samoa prime minister “expressed his condolences” to the families and forced the country to temporarily pull the MMR vaccine from the market.
To the gasps of those who have had children injured by the MMR vaccine, Samoan authorities did not investigate what was wrong with the vaccine. Instead, authorities focused theirprobe on two nurses, charging them with two counts of manslaughter and declaring “nothing was wrong with the vaccine.” Month’s later, astill angry motherof one of the victims demanded “answers” for the death of her child. She clearly doesn’t believe the line of propaganda being sold to her as truth.
Within Samoa, malnutrition is a “growing health concern, particularly for children.”15Vitamin A treatment costs two or three pennies per dose9 and unlike vaccines, can be administered easily by parents or other providers because it does not require special training or refrigeration. While the vitamin A shipments by citizens to reduce complications in those with measles infections are disparaged in the press and social media, UNICEF has sent 30,000 vitamin A tablets along with 110,500 doses of measles containing vaccine to the island of Samoa.16
8 December, 2019 – Samoan Government Arrests “Anti-Vaxxer” as Measles Campaign Widens Dec. 5, 2019, the Samoan government reportedly arrested a “vocal antivaccination campaigner” and charged him with “incitement” as the government widens a mass measles vaccination campaign in the small South Pacific island nation of about 200,000 people. More than 4,300 measles cases with 63 deaths have been reported since the measles outbreak began in mid-October.1
Edwin Tamasese, a Samoananti-vaccinationactivist with no medical training who was also the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective,[8] was charged with “incitement against a government order”.[44]
He had posted online comments like “Enjoy your killing spree.”[8]He encouraged people to refuse immunisation, as he believed the vaccine caused measles,[45]and even discouraged life-saving antibiotics.[8]Tamasese faced up to two years in prison.[8]
Samoan government health officials have issued a recall of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine after two infants, a girl and a boy, died on July 6, 2018 just hours after being given the combination vaccine at Safotu Hospital on the island of f Savai’i in Samoa. 1234
Testing is underway by the Samoan Ministry of Health to determine if the vaccines caused the deaths of the babies. Local police are conducting a separate investigation into the two cases.1234
“We’ve ceased and sent out a directive to stop and cease all vaccinations of the children with the MMR,”1 said Samoa’s Director General of Health Leausa Toleafoa Dr. Take Naseri.
TV1 in Samoa is reporting that two infants have died within minutes of receiving the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Tala Fou brings you breaking news on the death of two young children both aged 1-year-old from the villages of Safotu and Sasina in Savaii. Both children died within minutes of being vaccinated with the MMR vacine at Safotu Hospital on Friday morning the 6th of July.
Our News Reporter Alisa Faamaoni met with both families in Savaii today. The parents of the first child Marietta and Samuelu Tuisuesue of Sasina explained in detail to Tala Fou that within three minutes of their 1-year-old daughter Lannacallystah Samuelu being injected with the MMR vaccine by a nurse she was dead. (Source.)
Clearly, the nutritional status of a country matters when it comes to lowering mortality from measles. This has certainly been the case in the United States, where measles mortality rates in the U.S. dropped by more than 90 percent during the first half of the 20th century prior to the introduction of the first measles vaccine in 1963.19
Deaths from measles had decreased from 21 deaths per 1000 reported cases during 1911-1912 to less than one death per 1000 reported cases in 1953-1962. This improved measles morality rate was owed to several factors unrelated to the measles vaccine, including better sanitation and living conditions, as well as better nutrition and improved access to health care.19
In their book, Dissolving Illusions, Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries noted that the incidence of measles was also on a downward trend—albeit a much slower rate than the decline in mortality—before the 1963 measles vaccine. 8We know, for example, that in 1954 there were 682,720 reported cases of measles in the U.S.13 This was followed by 555,156 cases in 1955; 611,936 in 1956; 486,799 in 1957; 763,094 in 1958; 406,162 in 1959; 441,703 in 1960; 423,919 in 1961; 481,530 in 1962; and 385,156 in 1963.13
While the number of reported cases of measles went up and down from year to year, the overall trend line was downward. In fact, the trend line had been going down since 1941, when the number of reported cases totaled 894,134.13
Interestingly, in 1964 (the year after the introduction of the first killed measles vaccine), the number of reported cases of measles actually went up to 458,083.13
Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries reasonably ask, “Was measles slowly becoming less prevalent anyway?”8
We know that measles can be sub-clinical 30 percent of the time, and the death rate had already plummeted. Like smallpox, was the disease slowly burning out? Was the rise in breastfeeding and improved nutrition contributing to fewer diagnosed cases? How many cases that were recorded as measles based on a clinical diagnosis really other viruses? Can we at all trust measles incidence statistics in the first place?8
If the trend continued as seen in the measles incidence graph, then measles incidence would have hit zero in the year 2000 without any vaccine program. Coincidentally, the year 2000 is the same year the CDC declared measles eliminated from the United States.8
A long history of measles vaccine failures For over 25 years, outbreaks have been reported in populations with vaccination rates exceeding 95 percent, undermining the mainstream assumption that vaccines are the singular solution to measles control.
Here is a documented historical record of such vaccine failures:
1985, Texas, U.S.: A study published in theNew England Journal of Medicine in 1987 analyzed a measles outbreak in Corpus Christi, Texas, where 99 percent of students were vaccinated and more than 95 percent were immune. The researchers concluded: “Outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”
1985, Montana, U.S.: An article in the American Journal of Epidemiology examined an outbreak of137 measles cases in Montana, despite a 98.7 percent vaccination rate. The researchers stated: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”
1988, Colorado, U.S.: A measles outbreak at a Colorado collegeinfected 84 students, even though over 98 percent had documented immunity due to strict vaccination policies. Researchers concluded that “measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”
1989, Quebec, Canada: Initially blamed on low vaccine coverage, a study published in theCanadian Journal of Public Healthconcluded: “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.”
1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A study published in theRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalfound that 76.4 percent of measles cases in this outbreak had been vaccinated before their first birthday.
1992, Cape Town, South Africa: A study in theSouth African Medical Journaldocumented an outbreak where 91 percent of children were vaccinated, and vaccine efficacy was only 79 percent. The researchers concluded that primary and secondary vaccine failure contributed to the outbreak.
These are just a handful of examples from an extensive body of literature documenting measles outbreaks occurring in highly vaccinated populations — clear evidence that vaccine-induced immunity is neither lifelong nor consistently effective.
This article is about measles alone. The combination MMR shot will be discussed separately.
Highlights
A long-held notion asserts that normal childhood illnesses ultimately strengthens the immune system; could that be true?
We’ve been taught to fear illness, but should we?
Shockingly, some scientists question what measles is.
What does it mean to stop or eliminate measles? Do we really want to?
Public health officials had come to a consensus that measles was a mild disease we should live with, but then decided measles was “important” when the vaccine was licensed, for the sole reason that we now had a product to sell for it.
Acclaimed Prosecutor, PM advisor, victim advocate 20yrs+ turned whistleblower: I UN-covered a plot to use indigenous rights as a device to asset-strip the world
Worth the watch – 13:19 Commentary:
💯👇😬 🚨 They Live was never just a movie… it was a WARNING! John Carpenter’s 1988 cult classic predicted the year 2025 as the moment..
Stardust says they have created a powder that they promise “wouldn’t accumulate in humans or ecosystems, and can’t harm the ozone layer or create acid rain like the sulfur-rich particles from volcanoes.”
But it refuses to disclose what the particles are actually made of, rendering those promises meaningless without transparency, independent verification, or the public’s informed consent.
Substack Israeli-U.S. Geoengineering Company ‘Stardust’ to Begin Blocking the Sun with Airborne Chemicals ‘As Soon as April’ Company will not disclose what the aerosol is made of, raising informed consent worries.
The good news – according to theWHO– is that all these efforts have been successful so far, and they are actually vaccinating more children than they planned too.
…And the world breathed a sign of relief.
Thankfully the starving, homeless children of Gaza won’t get polio as they crouch under the rubble of their homes praying the next batch of cluster bombs misses them.
Israel and Hamas have agreed to a “series of pauses” in ‘fighting’ to allow children to be vaccinated against polio, with WHO successfully rolling out the first 640,000 shots.
How is a vaccine programme allowed to take place during a ‘deadly war’?
Not even ‘war’ can stop Big Pharma.
Equally as important, we must question the true intentions as to why a polio vaccine campaign is underway in Gaza, given the troubled history of the product itself – both in the past and the modern day.
A group of climate alarm devotee ‘scientists’ are lobbying signatories to an Eisenhower-era Antarctic Treaty to fork over $50 billion so they can construct a 62-mile “curtain” to protect the world from what they’re calling a “doomsday glacier.”The glacier in question is known as Thwaites Glacier, a Great Britain-sized hunk of ice located in western Antarctica. It has been nicknamed the “Doomsday Glacier” by climate zealots because it can be subject to warmer ocean currents. Climate alarmists claim that climate change, brought on by human emissions of greenhouse gases, is responsible for disrupting what they call “traditional ice thickening and thinning cycles” of the glacier.
Regular readers will know that I have long been concerned over the extraordinary level of payments to wind farms to switch off.
These so-called ‘constraint payments’ are deemed necessary when the wires in the transmission grid have inadequate capacity to get a generator’s power to market. [emphasis, links added]
The scientists are injecting reflective particles into the sky, dumping chemicals in the ocean, and spraying saltwater in the air in a desperate effort to stop or reverse “climate change.”
They claim techniques are necessary to cool the planet because global efforts to check greenhouse gas emissions are failing.
These geoengineering approaches were once considered taboo by scientists and regulators who feared that tinkering with the environment could have unintended consequences.
However, researchers are receiving taxpayer funds and private investments to advance Gates’s plans.
Geoengineering has become mainstream in recent years, and on the outskirts of these scientific discussions, you will now find some pretty wild and hilarious weather manipulation ideas.
In “The Wizard of Oz”, at one point Dorothy tells her dog that she has “a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore”. She had been dropped in a strange new world that was crazier than anything she had ever imagined. Needless to say, many of us feel the exact same way. We’re not in the America that we grew up in anymore. Instead, we now live in a country that appears to be a cross between a really bad science fiction movie and a freak show. Sadly, the pace of change has now reached an exponential rate, and things will get even more insane during the years that are ahead of us.
‘When do we stop pretending that men can simply become women and women can be men?
How much longer can we let this mass mania go on?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, last seen making toddlers mask for a virus that barely affected them — using masks that didn’t prevent exposure — now has suggestions fortrans men and women who want to breastfeed.
In 2020, we started investigating thevirus modeland came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-calledTobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properlycontrolled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement.
The narratives stemming from virology’s pseudoscience are now used to control populations in every possible way by keeping them in a state of fear. The phantom “viruses” and the invented “countermeasures” also enable vast transfers of wealth from the public to governments and their favoured friends, while allowingreal and sickening globalist agendasto roll on. It is therefore more important than ever to help more people see beyond the virus model, both for their own health and the future of humanity. While for some individuals this requires a scientific treatise such as Mark’sA Farewell to Virology, for many others they simply want to know, “if it’s not a virus, what’s making me sick then?” In this video, I answer that question with my top 40 reasons…
In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of theAlliance for Human Research Protectionsent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary“Never Again is Now Global”.
The task for our chapter was to “unmask the viral paradigm” and bidA Farewell to Virologyin non-technical language, while still citing scientific reports.
Our essay provides the overview of how the “pandemic” was staged and in some ways is a summary of part of our latest book,The Final Pandemic.
Jerm and Dr Tom Cowan discuss the COVID pandemic, questioning virus myths and medical authority. They highlight flawed virus isolation, unreliable PCR testing, and the body’s natural healing. They explore detoxification, challenge contagion theories, and debunk myths about bacteria, rabies, and the immune system. They stress the need for a scientifically literate society to build a healthier culture.
In this episode, Alec explores the misconceptions surrounding infectious diseases and reframes how we understand sickness. He examines the role of belief in health, gaps in virus research, and alternative reasons for individual and group illness. Discover insights into biofield interactions, the intelligence of water as it relates to our body, and how shifting your perspective can unlock new paths to wellness.
What if viruses don’t exist at all? – In this explosive interview, Dr. Tom Cowan — longtime physician and author of The Contagion Myth — makes the shocking case that everything we know about viruses and germ theory is wrong. – He says illness comes from toxins, not contagion — and mainstream science doesn’t want you to hear it. – Watch now and decide for yourself: medical truth-teller or dangerous heretic?
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 @KimIversenShow I spoke with Dr Tom Cowan who challenges the idea that viruses even exist. What he says may be controversial, but it will definitely get you thinking👇 https://x.com/KimIversenShow/status/1907086569544036726
This video, presented by Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., provides an in-depth analysis of the standard “Virus”-theory in the context of German New Medicine (GNM). More information is available athttps://learninggnm.com.
The findings of this investigation align with what is seen in the published literature. Find all of the official documents (FOIs) and emails with virologists here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
In this dynamic interview, Christine Massey shares her groundbreaking research into the issue of whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, as well as the broader question as to whether any “virus” has been proven to exist.
Christine Massey has a master’s degree in bio-statistics and has worked in cancer research.
The controversy over whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, is confusing to most people, but Ms. Massey pursued a route that was purely objective in doing this research. She submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to 213 medical institutions in 40 different countries asking them for documents that proved that the COVID virus has been purified and proven to exist. The responses she received from these institutions were absolutely shocking and draws into question everything they have been telling the public!
Another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature
My order was for:
All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. – that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged “avian influenza virus” (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in “host” cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or
2. – that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be “avian influenza virus” directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called “hosts”, with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or
3. – wherein the purported “genome” of any alleged “avian influenza virus” was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a “host” (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or
4. – that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported “avian influenza viruses”. My July 21, 2024FOIA orderfiled with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.
– As we delve into Alec Zeck’s 2.5-hour presentation, Reframing the Infectious Disease Paradigm* , we encounter a rigorous critique that challenges this paradigm’s foundations.
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
The work of Cowan and others are leading the way on questioning the foundations of virology.
‘Catching colds via viruses’ was studied for 44 years by the Common Cold Unit. Remains unproven.
“Novel pathogen” that “leaked” from a lab that spread around the world killing people in 2020. Disproved by the work of Rancourt.
Can they make stuff in labs that can make people sick or dead? Sure.
Can you use that to start a “pandemic” panic, with the media doing the rest. Sure.
But can they make something from genetic matter that “can pandemic.” I am confident the answer is no. It is not biologically plausible. So in that context, the biolab risk is wildly exaggerated for financial and industrial “pandemic preparedness” reasons.
30 July, 2024 – No “Virus” has ever been isolated No “Virus” has ever been isolated. A thread Here is one of 12 experiments in over 90 cultures, all with the same results. There is NO SAMPLE in these cultures and hence NO possibility of “a Virus” yet we see here CPE (Cell death) indicative of the presence of a “virus”.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture! The CDC was FOI’d and had no records.)
In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
In this video, we look at a Freedom of Information Act Request that the CDC provided that they say constitutes “proof” that Covid is a virus, is contagious and that it causes disease.
We go through source by source to show that this is inaccurate. We compare electron microscope images of “Covid” and show there are identical particles known to exist in cells already and researchers pointed this out in 2020.
We review the inappropriate controls used to compare “Covid” testing.
In this video, we continue with the discussion about antibodies, we look at the first acknowledged paper that references the idea of antibodies by Emil Von Behring and Kitashato Shibasaburu in relation to diptheria.
We briefly touch on their relationship to Robert Koch (who proposed Koch’s postulates). We then look at multiple failures of the diptheria vaccine that supposedly is conveying said antibodies to people. We then look at that fact that other entities, including vitamin C have been shown to neutralize diptheria.
So, if we haven’t isolated an antibody, and we know other things can neutralize diptheria, how can we come to conclusion that antibodies necessarily convey immunity?
In this video, we continue looking at the evidence for Antibodies going back to the time of Paul Ehrlich and explore the evidence of the “Side Chain” theory.
We briefly discuss the evidence of the effect of Vitamin C on both diptheria and tetanus to demonstrate that neutralization is not exclusive to the antibody idea.
We look at Ehrlich’s presentation to the Royal Society and some of his research works on “side chain” theory and find much of his experimental evidence is lacking.
In this video, we continue to look the supposed benefits anti bodies or the class of particles called Gamma Globulins that they supposedly constitute.
We will see that it appears there are some useful clinical applications for their use at times but we covered side effects, including potentially fatal ones, in the previous lecture.
We will touch on potential environmental exposures that could be causing symptoms expressed in agammaglobunemia which would been use of gamma globulins is indicated. We will cover electrophoresis as an isolating agent and how fragile a process this can be.
In this video, we finally discuss the origin of the supposedly “unique:” anti-bodies suchas IgG, IgM, and IgE etc., how ultracentrifugation is used to identify differences in anti bodies.
Yet we keep finding new sources of potential error but no reproducibility studies of old literature?
We see more examples of both antibodies and white blood cell counts not being sufficient to explain immunity. And finally we look at the side effect profile of administering these immunoglobulins.
This lecture is the culmination of several other lectures so reviewing the lectures on CPE, cDNA and the previous Renin, Hypertensin, and angiotensin lectures will be necessary to understand it.
We deconstruct the idea that ACE 2 is a membrane bound receptor. We will see that they did not do appropriate experiments to determine that Sars Cov 1 attached to ACE 2 and the problem compounds with Covid 19. We will see that despite multiple recommendations since 2020 to use ACE 2 blocker when we actually implement the practice there is no noticeable difference in “Covid” outcomes.
So, how can we say ACE 2 is the entry point for the virus into cells if in the real world when we use medications to block the receptor it does impact the disease at all?
In this video, we finally cover staining procedures for viewing images of virus in electron microscopes.
We review the work of Harold Hillman and his disputing of current views on electron microscope and the nature of artifacts in the slides.
We cover the staining process used on “Covid 19” that requires uranyl acetate and lead citrate, both of which have confirmed toxicity to kidney tissues which is what Covid virus images are tested against.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax: This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey
Because “they” (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearlydon’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of COVID ‘vaccines’. Where is the evidence for this? How sound is it? Where is the risk benefit analysis? How many lives saved compared to how many excess deaths caused or at least strongly associated with the COVID injections worldwide?
Findings: Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7-15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1-20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination.
According to a study published Thursday. June 23, 2022 in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year, but even more deaths could have been prevented if global targets had been reached. (Pfizer via AP)
A bright red flag is here:
“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”
There are clear conflicts of interest in the funding from bodies directly invested in the vaccine industry such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.
Imperial College London are the original modellers that grossly over-estimated the expected GOVID deaths leading to policies and practices based on unrealistic fear. They predicted over half a million deaths in the UK and over 2 million deaths in the US. They had a vested interest in balancing the books with a model that produced an outcome with strikingly similar number of ‘lives saved’.
WHO (World Health Organisation) are funded heavily by the Gates Foundation. They are at present lobbying to have global oversight over all future pandemics. Changes to the IHR (International Health Regulations, if successful will give them unprecedented powers including mandating vaccination in all member countries.
Arecent preprint, with the now questionable Medical Journal Lancet, makes the claim that the Covid vaccine introduction in December 2020 actually prevented tens of millions of deaths worldwide.
This paper was submitted by the research group headed by Azra Ghani from the Imperial College of London. Dr. Ghani acts as a consultant for HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline, and the WHO and as with her other Imperial College colleagues, has been pro-lockdown/pro-panic, and pro-vaccine for more than two years.
A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:
“C. Population Susceptibility
The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”
“The mathematical models that have been presented from Imperial College have always been wildly WRONG.”
In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.
In defence of the unprecedented numbers of reported deaths and serious adverse effects following the Covid injections, the pro-vax “health experts” always retreat to the mythical “20 million lives saved” claim without providing any evidence.
CLICK HERE to view a paper by Makeover, T. et al entitled “Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness” which was published in May 2023. I quote from this paper:
“By comparing graphs of the intensity of vaccination and the rate of mortality, we see periods of intense vaccination are followed by periods of higher excess mortality. Basic statistical data confirm that COVID-19 vaccines increased the mortality rate” and “it has confirmed that the vaccinated part of the global population has an increased mortality rate of about 14.5% with respect to the non-vaccinated population cohort”.
and here are the numbers from the paper:
Infection fatality ratio (IFR):
The proportion of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 who die from COVID-19.
20 million lives saved? Here are quite recent pre-vaccination IFR data on Covid-19 in the young and working-age population:
“The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”
“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0–59 and 0–69 year old people, respectively.”
‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’
Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.
1 January 2023
Fig. 2. Box plot of infection fatality rate (IFR) estimates across countries per each specified age bin.
Unknown to many, if Australia does not take definitive steps to formally exit the World Health Organisation (WHO) before November 2023, unelected and unaccountable elite bureaucrats connected to powerful commercial interests will have the power to force everyone to receive injections and implement mandatory confinement and removal of all human rights for any perceived or imagined “emergency”.
Article 18 of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” would empower the World Health Organization to “tackle false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation.”
‘One Health’ will give WHO’s Dictator General power to initiate climate lockdowns. Behind the verbiage, One Health is a tool to create networks and combine efforts towards centralising power and control. Once central power has been achieved then similar measures that were imposed in response to the covid “pandemic” can be used for climate change, loss of biodiversity, human diseases, vector-borne diseases and more.
Member states would be obliged to follow the agency’s instructions when responding to pandemics, including by introducing vaccine passports, border closures and quarantine measures, under a draft update to its regulations.
A new ‘pandemic treaty’ under discussion would also force Britain to spend 5% of its health budget on preparing for another virus outbreak.
The World Health Organization and its sister organizations have established a global delusion covering all 194 nations, including the U.S. Delusion is defined as “A belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary, generally in reference to a mental disorder.” In short, the world has gone mad. ⁃ TN Editor
Why should people ever trust the WHO, their governments and their government’s agencies ever again? They can’t and they shouldn’t! They won’t! (Video: Ivor Cummin
The WHO’s proposed treaty, taken together with its “synergistic” amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), aim to undo centuries of democratic reform that based sovereignty with individuals, and by extension their State. The discomfort of facing this truth and the complexities it raises is providing the cover needed to push these changes through. This is how democracy, and freedom, wither and die.
Australia is at risk of losing its sovereignty to the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) due to proposed changes to the World Health Assembly’s (WHA’s) International Health Regulations (IHR). All this even if Australia votes against the proposals.
This evidence report reveals how the World Health Organization and United Nations are sexualizing little children in primary education worldwide, for the purpose of normalizing pedophilia. This report consists of nothing but solid evidence, with many official documents, videos, books, archives, etc. All PDF documents may be downloaded from the references section at the end of this report:
Writes Oz’s Substack
Aug 10: