20 million lives saved from ‘The Vaccine’?
An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of COVID ‘vaccines’. Where is the evidence for this? How sound is it? Where is the risk benefit analysis? How many lives saved compared to how many excess deaths caused or at least strongly associated with the COVID injections worldwide?
Here is the article:
23 June, 2022 – Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study
Findings: Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7-15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1-20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination.
24 June, 2022 – COVID vaccines saved 20M lives in 1st year, scientists say,
According to a study published Thursday. June 23, 2022 in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year, but even more deaths could have been prevented if global targets had been reached. (Pfizer via AP)
A bright red flag is here:
“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”
There are clear conflicts of interest in the funding from bodies directly invested in the vaccine industry such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.
Imperial College London are the original modellers that grossly over-estimated the expected GOVID deaths leading to policies and practices based on unrealistic fear. They predicted over half a million deaths in the UK and over 2 million deaths in the US. They had a vested interest in balancing the books with a model that produced an outcome with strikingly similar number of ‘lives saved’.
WHO (World Health Organisation) are funded heavily by the Gates Foundation. They are at present lobbying to have global oversight over all future pandemics. Changes to the IHR (International Health Regulations, if successful will give them unprecedented powers including mandating vaccination in all member countries.
24 June, 2022 – Did Covid Vaccines Save Tens of Millions of Lives?
A recent preprint, with the now questionable Medical Journal Lancet, makes the claim that the Covid vaccine introduction in December 2020 actually prevented tens of millions of deaths worldwide.
This paper was submitted by the research group headed by Azra Ghani from the Imperial College of London. Dr. Ghani acts as a consultant for HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline, and the WHO and as with her other Imperial College colleagues, has been pro-lockdown/pro-panic, and pro-vaccine for more than two years.
20 August, 2022 – 20 million saved or 20 million killed
A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:
“C. Population Susceptibility
The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”
“The mathematical models that have been presented from Imperial College have always been wildly WRONG.”
In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.
analysis-of-covid19-vaccination-effectiveness 
10 August, 2023 – MORE HARM THAN GOOD Clear evidence for all to see
In defence of the unprecedented numbers of reported deaths and serious adverse effects following the Covid injections, the pro-vax “health experts” always retreat to the mythical “20 million lives saved” claim without providing any evidence.
CLICK HERE to view a paper by Makeover, T. et al entitled “Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness” which was published in May 2023. I quote from this paper:
“By comparing graphs of the intensity of vaccination and the rate of mortality, we see periods of intense vaccination are followed by periods of higher excess mortality. Basic statistical data confirm that COVID-19 vaccines increased the mortality rate” and “it has confirmed that the vaccinated part of the global population has an increased mortality rate of about 14.5% with respect to the non-vaccinated population cohort”.
and here are the numbers from the paper:
Infection fatality ratio (IFR):
The proportion of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 who die from COVID-19.
20 million lives saved? Here are quite recent pre-vaccination IFR data on Covid-19 in the young and working-age population:
“The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”
“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0–59 and 0–69 year old people, respectively.”
‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’
Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.
1 January 2023
Fig. 2. Box plot of infection fatality rate (IFR) estimates across countries per each specified age bin.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X?fbclid=IwAR1GIE6yltX_kEbcE5Md1yVjynYoZgwd6dFbz3Qd-2-z8agqm_Ude4cncHI
Doctors Speak Out Update August 2022
Videos:
27 August, 2022 – Doctors with Voices #6 A Club Grubbery special. Reproductive specialist Dr Luke Mclindon speaks his amazing truth in a rational and sensible way.
30 April, 2020 – Watch controversial press conference held by two Bakersfield doctors that was pulled down by YouTube
DR WILLIAM BAY, QUEENSLAND MD TRUTH BOMBS THE AMA CONFERENCE IN SYDNEY
Dr Bay speaks outside the AMA meeting in Sydney…
Research/ Articles:
QHPA – Queensland Health Practitioners Alliance
The Queensland Health Practitioner Alliance (QHPA) is a group of medical, complementary and allied health professionals who have joined together in the fight to uphold our right to practice and support our community.
“We believe in the fundamental FREEDOM of every individual to choose their own medical treatments, procedures & healthcare options.”
25 August, 2022 – Dozens of Aussie doctors defecting as Covid vax narrative crumbles
WHEN long-serving and highly respected surgeon and reproductive specialist Dr Luke McLindon refused an mRNA vaccination last November, the medical establishment pounced and had him terminated from his position at the Mater Hospital in Brisbane.
But with dozens of doctors now “coming out” against the Covid narrative, so-called medical authorities in organisations like AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Authority), will have big problems on their hands.
22 August, 2022 – Law firm releases bombshell legal opinion on alleged illegal control of Doctor’s conduct – Malcolm Roberts
In essence, the Legal Opinion posits that the 9 March 2021 AHPRA ‘gag order’ was only an advisory, not even AHPRA policy. It was made in contravention to the Codes of Conduct which supersede such an advisory in Law. Even if made with good intentions as the experimental gene-based Covid-19 injectables were rolled out in an atmosphere of great hope, its outcomes have been to undermine the Codes of Conduct, the practitioner-patient/client relationship, and thwart the right of patients to fully-informed Informed Consent.
Vaccine Skeptics are the True Critical Thinkers – Igor Chudov
Vaccine Skeptics are the True Critical Thinkers
We Overcame the Most Sophisticated Forms of Manipulation
This post is the first in my future series, on how governments and shady non-governmental players psychologically manipulated us during the Covid-19 crisis. In this series, I will highlight various dirty tricks and explain why most people fell for them, one per post.
First, a little personal anecdote.
Richard Thaler is a brilliant behavioral economist, Nobel Prize winner, and a major contributor to the “Nudge Theory”, that provided impetus for the infamous UK “Nudge Unit”. His work on human decision making and cognitive biases was groundbreaking and, in part, helped governments worldwide to hypnotize most people into taking “Covid Vaccines”.
Richard Thaler, around 1999, also taught my favorite class “Decision Making”. He was my favorite professor at the University of Chicago, where I was an MBA student. He taught us a lot about ways that exist to hijack our decision making and how our adversaries use our subconscious biases to make us make wrong decisions — as well as how we can use these manipulations to our own advantage in business.
What I learned in that class was helpful throughout my entire life, affected many investment and business decisions, helped me convert prospects to paying customers, avoid several stockmarket crashes, and much more. This same decision making class possibly saved my life, because it made me able to recognize and resist Covid vaccine propaganda and manipulation. Prof. Thaler ended up on the wrong side of history, supporting Covid vaccine propaganda and the nudge units, but his teachings made me able to recognize manipulation, and resist it.
Thinking about that made me appreciative of people who never took any such class, often had no formal education, and yet they made the right choice instinctively. These people, many of whom are my readers, are worthy of admiration, if for no other reason than remarkable independence of thinking and a clear mind in a very confusing, dangerous, and rapidly shifting situation.
My future posts will go through various psychological manipulation concepts and how they were applied, by shady actors and co-opted governments, and how they affected each of us.
The Asch Experiment
“All experts agree that the vaccine is safe and effective. ”
That was enough to get most people vaccinated. Except that anyone could ask two questions:
- How can I know that all experts agree, if those disagreeing are not allowed to speak up?
- How can anyone know that “Covid vaccine” is safe and effective, if no time actually passed to ensure that?
Finally, someone with just a bit of knowledge could also ask a question, “are you sure that it is safe and effective, if no coronavirus vaccine ever worked, and no mRNA product was ever approved”?
The Asch Experiment, conducted by Solomon Asch, found out that most people, when seeing a “consensus” of participants agreeing on something that is fairly obviously false, actually ends up agreeing with those false opinions just because everyone else seems to think so.
The experiment was originally set up with eight persons, only one of whom was an experimental subject, and the rest were actors. These stooges, who the subject thought were other subjects, were all asked the same question, to which they gave an obviously wrong answer. The subject, who did not know he was the only real subject, was to speak up last.
It turned out that subjects of this experiment (it was repeated multiple times), seeing a consensus of seven smartly dressed men, would end up giving the same (obviously incorrect) answer as the stooges. This conformance experiment literally was a clever way to make people hold and express obviously false opinions.
This experiment was repeated many times, and in the most skillfully conducted experiments, they got 62.5% of subjects to agree with obvious nonsense at least once.
Oddly enough, vaccination rate in the US on Sep 1, right before federal vaccine mandates started, was 62.3%. Vaccination was running out of steam, just as Delta was showing that vaccines were not really “effective”.
It is at this time, on September 2, Richard Thaler concluded that “a nudge is not enough”.
Seeing a slowdown and a dip in confidence, vaccinators realized that they need to do more than mere manipulation with fake “expert opinion”. Vaccine mandates and hate propaganda supplanted “nudges” to drive vaccination forward. That will be discussed in other posts.
We literally lived through a worldwide Asch experiment. Every newspaper, TV station, every YouTube recommended video, kept telling us how the vaccine was “safe and effective” and how “all experts agree”. We were constantly force fed these “expert opinions” nonstop.
Enormous efforts were spent to silence “misinformation”. Why? Because Solomon Asch found out that any expression of disagreement — lack of consensus — immediately kills compliance:
Regarding mRNA “Covid vaccines”: anyone who would think for a minute, would realize that there was not a way to know for sure that vaccines were safe and effective, simply because not enough time has passed. Similarly, anyone could see that the masterminds behind the lockdowns and vaccinations, the billionaires behind the scenes, and the corrupt governments, all ensured that any dissent would be silenced. Thus, the purported consensus did not, in fact, exist at all.
The minority of people saw through that, decided accordingly, and refused vaccination. Who was that? You, my readers. What made you decide this? I am sure that there were just as many reasons as people here. The main factor is that you all took a few minutes to think about it critically. You were independently minded and decided to think for yourselves.
- Was it your general distrust of the government?
- Was is your deep knowledge of virology and molecular biology?
- Was it your experience with wheeling and dealing, exposure to scams and knowing how con men operate?
- Was it your ability to think independently without needing people to agree with you?
Even those who took the shots, and saw the light later, are critical thinkers. What is important is seeing the light — not necessarily the timing of when you saw the light.
To those who survived The Global Asch Experiment, congratulations. Please share what made you hold out, below — Why did you NOT get the shot?
P.S. Richard Thaler, a brilliant professor, author, and theoretician in the cognitive bias field, is not an evil mastermind of vaccination. He was merely one of many players, minutely related to me, and the author of concepts that played out in the pandemic. I do NOT want to create a wrong impression of my favorite college professor being someone like “Dr Evil of Covid-19”. He was not Dr Evil. But his theories are incredibly important to the story.
1,582 likes
Globalism and Abusive Relationships
Abusive-Relationship-Infographic
15 signs you might be in an abusive relationship [with governments and globalists as the abusers].
Take a moment and read the 15, considering how each applies re: the current world situation.
Increasing degrees of totalitarian control in our post COVID-19 ‘bio-security’ world is abuse on a global scale profoundly affecting both adults and children.
Exposure to extreme abuse arising from lockdowns, mask and vaccine mandates surveillance and coercion crushes a sense of personal value and worthiness.
Global predators , the perpetrators, systematically use a plethora of mass psychology strategies to create widespread unconditional obedience in order to further their plans as outlined in Lockstep, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and The Great Reset.
Being aware of the game plan of global control towards a centralized, technocratic world government allows us to transcend their psychological operations and build a future based on wisdom, compassion and personal power.
Videos:
Psychological Warfare | How the Tyrants Manipulate the Masses
September, 2021 – Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Human Rights and Freedom
CONFUSION: KEEPING UP WITH SHIFTING LOCKDOWN AND VACCINE NARRATIVES
‘The Guy Who Decides COVID Restrictions’ (Satire)
‘The Guy Who Decides COVID Restrictions’ Part 2 (Satire)
Dramatic Melbourne arrest caught on camera (warning:disturbing footage)
Lockstep: The Rockefeller Foundation 2010
Research and articles:
16 July, 2023 – What Happens to Vaccine Clinical Trial Participants?
Nowadays, I am often asked how I could accurately predict the course of the pandemic, and my answer each time is: “All of this was just an escalation of what the industry had done previously.” As the years have gone by, the industry has become more and more brazen in pushing unsafe and ineffective medications onto the market and paying off the government to gaslight the injured parties rather than fulfilling its obligation to investigate and pull the harmful drugs.
24 May, 2023 – Gaslighting: The American People Are Trapped in a Textbook Abusive Relationship
I don’t think it’s farfetched to say that we, the people of the United States of America, have been gaslit.
Does this sound familiar? Lockdowns that keep you away from friends and loved ones? Losing your income and becoming dependent on handouts doled out by the government? Being censored and mocked when you say anything that is not in line with the official narrative? Being treated like a crazy conspiracy theorist who should be punished because of the harm you’re causing to others if you refuse to go along?
21 April, 2023 – Open Letter To An Emotionally Abused World
We were unprepared for the propaganda and manipulation that were inflicted on us. Consider this list of signs that a partner is being emotionally abusive, and ask yourself how many of these behaviors were reflected in the official response by government and public health leaders, and the media, during the pandemic
Manipulation of the Masses – Strong and Free Canada
“In 1957 sociologist Albert Biderman developed a framework for understanding the methods foreign governments used to extract false confessions from American prisoners of war. It has come to be called Biderman’s Chart of Coercion. This is Biderman’s Chart as applied to how governments are using the same tactics in this fake pandemic to manipulate the masses.”
16 March, 2025 – BIDERMAN’S CHART OF COERCION
On March 19, 2020 (day before COVID pandemic declared): “California governor Gavin Newsom issues a statewide stay-at-home order to slow the spread of COVID-19 instructing residents to only leave their homes when necessary and shutting down all but essential businesses.” This rapid-fire shock-and-awe battery upon the public consciousness was designed by behavioral psychologists to inflict trauma-based mind control, learned helplessness, hypnosis by confusion, and a worldwide Obedience-Prison-Conformity experiment on the . Tragically, most people failed or even zealously colluded before later becoming an amnesty-demander.
19 September, 2021 – COVID-19 and the Global Predators
“It’s just…” – Why I Won’t Submit
The Melbourne Syndrome
Is Systemic Gaslighting The Government’s Answer To Covid-19?
Gaslighting is affecting you, your relationships and your politics
Globalism and structural violence.
The structural violence of globalization
COVID Plans Include Family Separation & Involuntary Quarantine in “Camps”
‘Calamitous’: domestic violence set to soar by 20% during global lockdown.
COVID-19 and the rise of intimate partner violence
COVID-19, Authoritarian Neoliberalism, and Precarious Migrant Work in Singapore: Structural Violence and Communicative Inequality
COVID-19 Lockdowns and Domestic Violence.
Shutdowns Spur Mental Health Crisis in US, Experts Say
2,114 excess suicides from Canadians losing their livelihood to the lockdowns
Suicide Claimed More Lives in October Than 10 Months of COVID-19 in Japan, Report Shows
Lockdowns make lives poorer, not longer, new study finds
New normal oxymorons: Neglectful caring and compassionate tyranny
The tyrannical crime of “keeping people safe”
Mask Wearing is Ritualistic Submission.
The rise of Mask hysteria – what is the mask issue really masking?
Masks Are a Psychological Preparation for Mandatory Vaccinations
Pregnancy and the Jabs
All vaccines and now gene therapy injectables, come with dubious safety and efficacy profiles. Pregnant women are particularly at risk.
The COVID-19 mRNA inoculations have been developed extremely quickly. The trials did not include pregnant women. Where is the evidence of safety?
The safety data will only become available as more and more pregnant women get the jab under ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ (EUA) or ‘Provisional Approval’.
The Phase 3 Trials are being rolled out as mass vaccination across the world. All who get vaccinated are subjects of experimental vaccines* never trialed on humans before.
* mRNA or adenovirus.
Pregnancy adverse events from the jab are generally not reported in hospital and are attributed to ‘getting COVID’!
Reporting systems such as VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) and DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications – Australia ) are purely voluntary and represent only 1-10% of actual adverse reactions in pregnant women .
Governments are strongly recommending COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant women and severe restrictions on the unvaccinated. This is in the face of very concerning early data on spontaneous abortions and ectopic pregnancies, as well as adverse events of pregnant women. Some countries such as Norway do not recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women during the formative first trimester.
Early research has been compromised and flawed due to conflicts of interest. ‘Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons‘ has twenty one authors, all of whom work for the CDC (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention) and/or the FDA (Food and Drug administration). Not one has declared the ‘red flag’ fatally flawed statistical errors hiding the seven-fold increase in spontaneous abortions after the COVID jab.
How did the researchers get away with manipulating the figures? 104 women out of 127 who received a COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester, had a spontaneous abortion: 82%.
They diluted the figures by claiming that those who had spontaneous abortions were part of the total count of all those who were pregnant (827). However, by definition, spontaneous abortions only occur up to week twenty of pregnancy. Beyond twenty weeks they are classed as stillbirths.
The poor quality of results was compounded by the fact that more than 3000 women were never followed up. Additionally there was no data published on ability to conceive post-injection.
The onus is on pharmaceutical corporations and health departments to prove safety. The only way to achieve this is by voluntary fully informed consent of pregnant women, or women planning pregnancy in these Phase 3 trials. This is not happening.
Absence of proof of safety does not exclude the possibility of harm!
Videos:
27 April, 2024 – The Covid shots are catastrophic to pregnant women and unborn babies. Why are they risking the future of humanity? Dr. James Thorp
Typically the CDC see a 2 fold increase as a danger signal But our studies show a 1500 fold increase in menstrual abnormality A 58 fold in Miscarriages and a 38 fold in Fetal death VAERS reproductive reports:
COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
James A. Thorp, M.D. et al.
23 August, 2023 – Disturbing Trend: Maternal Death Rates Have Soared 50% Since Vaccine Rollout in America
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
4 August, 2023 – Shocking FOIA Results: $11 Million to Bribe OB-GYNs to Lie to Moms About Safety of MRNA-Vaccines
I interviewed fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr James Thorp recently; he has been one of the very few medical providers for pregnant women and babies, to have raised the alarm about massive damage to women and babies via the mRNA injection. The interview, in a transcript that I have edited for clarity, is one of the most important exchanges of our time.
1 June, 2023 – Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents
Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents
“This is a mystery novel in which the question is, how do we stop women from having healthy babies? That’s the story of the Pfizer documents.”
Read More: https://dailyclout.io/dr-naomi-wolf-uncovers-pfizers-depopulation-agenda-as-evidenced-by-its-own-documents/
25 February, 2023 – (“VAX”) +57x MISCARRIAGES, +38x STILLBIRTHS, +200x MENSTRUAL ABNORMALITIES – AWAKENING CHANNEL
25 August, 2022 – Dr Luke McLindon speaks to Graham Hood
Dr McLinden recently spoke at length with Graham Hood on his Club Grubbery on social media. Hood said “dozens of doctors” were now approaching his group. McLinden had sounded warnings to pregnant women about potential miscarriages following mRNA shots. His personal research revealed pregnancy losses in up to 74% of the vaccinated women in his practice – 4.6 to 14.8 times higher than typical normal rates of loss which range from 5 to 16% (58 – 69% above typical losses).
10 December, 2021 – Dr. Daniel Nagase: Stillbirths Exploding Across Canada In Fully “Vaxxed” Mothers
ARE COVID VACCINES TRIGGERING MISCARRIAGES?
1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots – Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get It
Research/Articles:
13 April, 2025 – Pregnant women deserve better than “trust us” science
A major study has been used to reassure pregnant women that Covid-19 vaccines are safe. But the data behind the claim are fatally flawed.
– The thalidomide disaster, diethylstilboestrol (DES), and other cautionary tales have shown what can happen when scientific rigour is sidelined in favour of commercial interests. So, when a new study published in Pediatrics – the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics – claimed that Covid-19 vaccination in early pregnancy was safe, it came with an air of authority and reassurance. Scratch the surface of this study, and something starts to unravel. Not only are the data unverifiable and privately sourced, but the study contains a fatal flaw that renders its conclusions virtually meaningless. The fatal flaw: The study analyzed 78,052 pregnancies that ended in a live birth—but left out 20,341 pregnancies that ended in miscarriage or other non-live outcomes. That’s not a minor oversight.
2 April, 2025 – From 4% to 30%: OB-GYN Reveals Alarming Miscarriage Surge After COVID Shots
Doctors and researchers allege a disturbing rise in miscarriages linked to COVID vaccines—and a cover-up to keep it quiet.
HOUSTON — This story was brought to my attention by Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and it’s a gut punch we need to feel.
She has done excellent work blowing the whistle on vaccine safety and what she has uncovered here, by way of the March 24, 2025 article by Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake on America Out Loud News, is bone-chilling.
It’s called “Behind the Numbers: Miscarriages Post-COVID Shots” and it sets out a reality the CDC and Big Pharma don’t want us to know: miscarriages have soared after COVID-19 vaccines started rolling out. This isn’t conspiracy talk. It’s data, experience, and a wake-up call. McCullough and Leake go further, citing a 2021 study by Shimabukuro in the New England Journal of Medicine that was pulled for massaging the truth. It masked the true risk of miscarriage, they say, by avoiding later-term losses and then displaying a sanitized 12.6 percent rate that doesn’t tell the full tale.
2 April, 2025 – From 4% to 30%: OB-GYN Reveals Alarming Miscarriage Surge After COVID Shots
OB-GYN Reveals Alarming Miscarriage Surge After COVID Shots.pdf
7 January, 2025 – The Risks of Being Vaccinated During Pregnancy
Despite assurances from health authorities, recent evidence and expert testimonies suggest that vaccines given during pregnancy pose a significant risk to both mother and baby. This article covers the following:
Lack of Proper Testing for Pregnant Women
Alarming Reports of Adverse Effects
The Role of Adjuvants and Ingredients
Trusting Your Natural Immunity
Steps to Protect Yourself and Your Baby
A Call for Transparency and Caution
5 January, 2025 – Evidence of Harm to Unborn and Nursing Infants and Their Mothers
On April 23, 2021, during a high-profile White House COVID-19 press briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced CDC’s new recommendation that all pregnant women receive the COVID-19 “vaccine.” Apparently basing this recommendation on a misleading CDC study published just days before, Walensky publicly declared that the vaccines appeared to be safe for pregnant women.
However, the study showed precisely the opposite.
FOR COMPLETE DETAILS: NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
30 November, 2024 – Major Birth Abnormalities Surge Among Covid-Vaccinated Mothers
Newly emerged data has revealed an alarming surge in major birth abnormalities among mothers who have received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The shocking discovery was revealed in Pfizer’s own pregnancy trial data.
Pfizer recently updated the results of their randomized clinical trial of the Covid injections on pregnant women.
The clinical trial, ID NCT04754594, is entitled: “To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Against COVID-19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years of Age and Older.”
The results from the trial were analyzed by MIT computer scientist and data expert Steve Kirsch.
Kirsch, the inventor of the optical computer mouse, is the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).
After breaking down the clinical trial results, Kirsch made a chilling discovery.
Kirsch found that mothers who received a Covid mRNA “vaccine,” before or during their pregnancy, were over four times more likely to give birth to a baby with major congenital abnormalities.
The data reveals that “vaccinated” mothers had a stunning 4.2X higher rate of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) when compared to unvaxxed moms.
Reference: https://ctv.veeva.com/study/to-evaluate-the-safety-tolerability-and-immunogenicity-of-bnt162b2-against-covid-19-in-healthy-pre
1 September, 2024 – Are Vaccines, Hormones and Pregnant Women a Lethal Combination?
A few weeks ago, I wrote an article about how pregnant women are being advised to get the whooping cough vaccination during pregnancy.
I explained that although doctors and health care professionals were portraying the whooping cough vaccination as a single vaccine, in reality there is no such thing as a single vaccine for whooping cough and that instead they are being given ADACEL, a vaccination for Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertusis (whooping cough).
During my research, I discovered that according to the ADACEL information sheet, Adacel may be causing a higher percentage of miscarriage and babies born with serious birth defects.
27 April, 2024 – Dr. James Thorp: “The COVID Shots Are Catastrophic to Pregnant Women and Unborn Babies. Why Are They Risking the Future of Humanity? “
The Covid shots are catastrophic to pregnant women and unborn babies. Why are they risking the future of humanity? – Dr. James Thorp
Typically the CDC sees a 2 fold increase as a danger signal
But our studies show a 1500-fold increase in menstrual abnormality 58-fold in Miscarriages and a 38-fold in Fetal death.
COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes
and Menstrual Function
James A. Thorp, M.D. et al.
jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp
15 November, 2023 – How to Make COVID Vaccines Appear to be “Safe for Pregnancy”
Answer: just remove most-likely-to-miscarry vaccinated women from the data!
A newly published study that intended to prove that COVID vaccines are safe for women trying to become pregnant is raising more questions than it answers.
The study appears to intentionally exclude women most likely to experience miscarriage, but only among the vaccinated cohort!
14 November, 2023 – OB-GYN Drops Alarming Miscarriage Data Before Congress: “I’ve Never Seen This Before”
Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OB-GYN who has been involved in 8,000 pregnancies, details how miscarriage rates have doubled year-over-year since the introduction of the COVID-19 injections.
6 November, 2023 – Did Pfizer stop recruiting for their pregnancy trial because of adverse events in infants?
Pfizer had completed their randomized study but instead of enrolling the planned 4,000 moms-to-be, they enrolled 683 and only 161 women received 2 vaccines and 159 got placebo & completed the blinded period.
Why did the trial stop enrolling when it was so tiny?
Could it be they found a concerning signal and did not want to chance letting it become significant?
Could it have been this 👇🏻? That 5.1% of infants of vaccinated moms had adverse events of special interest (AESI) between birth and 6 months while only 1.3% of infants in the control arm had AESIs?
Because they limited the size of the trial, Pfizer can always say they didn’t find a significant signal. But if they don’t look, how can they find it?
Also, why are there only 156 infants in the vaccine arm and 159 in the placebo arm when 161 women received the vaccine and 159 received the placebo (and completed the blinded period)?
3 September, 2023 – Report 83: 23% of Vaccinated Mothers’ Fetuses or Neonates Died. Suppressed Lactation and Breast Milk Discoloration Reported.
Pfizer Post-Marketing Report by Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt
-
Twenty-eight deaths of either a fetus or neonate happened to women in the vaccinated group (124 women). So, 23% of the vaccinated mothers had fetuses or newborns who died.
-
These “losses” were described as spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) or various other terms which mean death of the fetus or baby.
-
23 August, 2023 – Disturbing Trend: Maternal Death Rates Have Soared 50% Since Vaccine Rollout in America
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
A “terrible report” by the National Center for Health Statistics, published on the CDC website, came out in the spring of this year, reported world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. What that report shows is that maternal death rates are increasing in America — and fast.
“There’s a section of the Pfizer documents in which Pfizer breaks down the adverse events and concludes that women sustain 72% of them,” she continued. “And of those — and these are Pfizer’s words — 16% are quote-unquote “reproductive disorders” compared to 0.49% for men. So they’re very focused on reproduction, on female reproduction.”
1 June, 2023 –Vaccinating pregnant mother is vaccinating child in utero, neonate: warning, COVID vaccine induced antibodies passively transferred to neonates may subvert, damage natural innate antibobies..
COVID vaccine induced antibodies passively transferred to neonates may subvert, damage natural innate antibobies from being ‘educated’, ‘trained’; neonates may be passively immunized to SARS-CoV-2 infection & the high-affinity vaccinal antibodies can outcompete infant’s innate antibodies for antigen.
23 April, 2023 – The disturbing truth about ‘safe’ vaccines for mothers-to-be – The Conservative Woman
Concentration of LNPs in ovaries, a doubled pregnancy early loss rate, and raised foetal abnormality rate across all measured categories indicate that designating a safe-in-pregnancy label (B1 category in Australia) was contrary to the available evidence.
21 April, 2021 – Pfizer MATISSE Trial Targets Pregnant Women for Bivalent RSV Vaccine
Unprecedented Pregnancy Study Fails on Efficacy, Durability, and Offers No Assurances on Long-Term Safety
19 April, 2023 – The False Messaging on Vaccines Given to Pregnant Women
Regulatory authorities knew that animal studies showed major red flags regarding both pregnancy loss and fetal abnormalities, consistent with the systemic distribution of the mRNA they had been hiding from the public.
1 March, 2023 – Fact check: “The covid vaccine is safe for pregnant women” Verdict: False
While anybody with any level of capacity for rational thought knows by now that there is (and never was) any need for women to get vaccinated before or during pregnancy, many still assume that the vaccine likely does no harm to them.
24 February 2023 – EXCLUSIVE: Whatever happened to Pfizer’s covid vaccine trial in pregnant women?
The trial began in 2021. But over a year after the last woman was enrolled, the company just admitted it still doesn’t have the data.
1 September, 2022 – UK Govt Tells Pregnant Women Not To Take The Vaccine
Sudden Surge in Stillbirths & Menstrual Changes
Story at-a-glance
-
At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection
-
At a rally outside the hospital, doctors launched an official complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, alleging conflicts of interest influencing their policies, decisions and statements made to the people of British Columbia
-
Scotland has also experienced an unusual rise in infant death rates; during September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births, up from an average of 2 per 1,000 births
-
As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
-
The CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics”
-
When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks’ gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%
BUSTED! CDC DATA: 82% OF PREGNANT WOMEN WHO GOT AN EARLY MRNA JAB MISCARRIED. CDC SCIENTISTS: IT’S JUST 12%
“A re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results.” (Source)
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons _ NEJM
“Early data from the v-safe surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the VAERS do not indicate any obvious safety signals with respect to pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with Covid-19 vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy”. The ‘elephant in the room’: COVID-19 vaccine had an 82% incidence of spontaneous abortion in the first trimester!
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons – Correction – 24 October, 2021
“In the table footnotes, the following content should have been appended to the double dagger footnote:
“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”
Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19
mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy
“The study presents falsely reassuring
statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’gestation).”
Experts Warn of ‘Huge Risk’ as Moderna Launches COVID Vaccine Trials for Pregnant Women
2,433 Dead Babies in VAERS as Another Study Shows mRNA Shots Not Safe for Pregnant Women
“There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines” (2,198 – Source.)
VAERS Data Reveals 50 X More Ectopic Pregnancies Following COVID Shots than Following ALL Vaccines for Past 30 Years
“That means that following COVID-19 injections into child-bearing women for the past 11 months has seen a 50 X increase in ectopic* pregnancies compared to child-bearing women receiving vaccines for the past 30+ years.”
June 24, 2021 – “Spike protein in breast milk is toxic” Alschner.Klartext
Use Google Translate to translate this article into English. Below are relevant translated excerpts:
Byram Bridle is Professor of Virology and Immunology at the University of Guelph, Canada. A few days ago, Bridal spoke to radio presenter Alex Pierson with a serious warning about the genetically engineered Covid vaccines . Together with other colleagues in Japan, Bridle had submitted an inquiry to the local registration authority about the Freedom of Information Act – and received information about the previously inaccessible animal test data on the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer and Biontech.
The data, in particular the pharmacokinetic overview tables, show that the mRNA nanoparticles do not remain locally at the puncture site in the muscle tissue, as assumed and claimed by the manufacturers, but reach the organs in sometimes dramatic concentrations…
Bridle warned, “We made a mistake. The spike protein is itself toxic and dangerous to humans. ”It is even transmitted to breastfed children through breast milk.
The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates in the blood for several days after vaccination. It accumulates as soon as it enters the blood and accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and, what is particularly worrying to me, it accumulates in fairly high concentrations the ovaries .
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) Pharmacokinetics Organ Distribution
Government Promotion:
1 September, 2023 – COVID-19 advice for pregnant women and new parents
COVID-19 vaccinations for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy
COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy. Pregnant women who have already received a primary course should discuss with their doctor or vaccination provider whether a booster dose is required during their pregnancy.
Information on COVID-19 vaccination can be found in the COVID-19 vaccination – Shared decision making guide for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy .
For more information read the latest guidance from ATAGI or talk to your doctor, midwife or vaccination provider.
COVID-19 advice for pregnant women and new parents _ NSW Government.pdf
Clinical recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines _ Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care.pdf
Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy
Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are preferred for the primary course and for booster doses in pregnant women.
There is a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of ancestral-based (original) mRNA vaccines in pregnancy.2,3
2. Sadarangani M, Soe P, Shulha HP, et al. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: A Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2022;22:1553-64.
3. Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2273-82.
COVID-19 vaccination – Shared decision making guide for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy _ Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care.pdf
21 November, 2021 – Australian Government – COVID-19 vaccination – The best time for pregnant women to get vaccinated is right now
Women Who are Pregnant are a Priority Group for COVID-19 Vaccination
UK – Information about COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy
Medical Mandates Have No Place in a Free Society
Videos:
15 September, 2021 – COVID-19 POLICY – EVALUATING THE EVIDENCE
13 September, 2021 – Q & A of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Panel & Town Hall hosted by Health Freedom Idaho (2 of 2)
5 September – Military Commander Says Mandatory Vaccinations Are a Security Threat
12 August, 2021 – Dr. Ryan Cole #StoptheMandate
Is Medical Tyranny Trampling Our Civil Rights?
2 January, 2021 – NY SB416: QUARANTINE CAMPS & FORCED VACCINATIONS – DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM ENOUGH? [BITCHUTE EXCLUSIVE]
Dictator Doctors, Adult Kidnapping, and Other Examples of Medical Tyranny
QR codes and $5000 fine. My research. Questioning directives by NSW Government to “mandate” QR check-in (NSW, Aus.)
How The Greater Good Is Used as a Tool of Social Control
Articles/Research:
20 September, 2021 – Technocrats Are Preparing ‘Mandatory’ Personal Carbon Allowances
1 September, 2021 – Military Service Members With Natural Immunity File Lawsuit Against DOD, FDA, HHS Over COVID Vaccine Mandate
25 August, 2021 – NYPD’s largest police union vows to sue over possible COVID vaccine mandate
16 August, 2021 – Navy commander: Mandatory military vaccination a ‘national security threat’
10 August, 2021 – Rand Paul’s Revolt: “We Will Make Our Own Health Choices!”
11 August, 2021 – COVID Vaccine Mandates Strongly Opposed in Europe, U.S. as Vaccine Failures Increase
11 August, 2021 – Big Pharma’s Worst Nightmare: Global Rebellion Against Vaccine Mandates Explodes
NOT A TYPO, NOT A MISTAKE – THE AUSTRALIAN “AUTHORISATION TO ADMINISTER A POISON”
‘Important Victory’: Massachusetts Rescinds Flu Vaccine Mandate
© 01/18/21 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
5 August, 2021 – Why COVID-19 Vaccines Should Not Be Required for All Americans
Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate
Helsinki Committee to declare Pfizer performing unauthorized human experiment in Israel
Israel agreed to be ‘giant testing trial lab for COVID-19 vaccine
I-am-exempt-face-covering-Wallet-Cards-A4-PRINT-covid-19-pdf Australia
Masks Are a Psychological Preparation for Mandatory Vaccinations
ACT NOW: Tell your governor and local legislators that COVID-19 vaccines must be voluntary!
Reject Big Pharma’s Vaccine Mandates in 2020
Vaccines Are a Choice Not a Mandate
A New Coalition Forms To Make Digital Vaccine ID Cards A Reality
The Risks vs. Benefits of Face Masks- Is There an Agenda?
© o5/26/2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate
Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate
© [24/11/2020] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
Apr 19·edited May 2Pinned
Your responses are incredible. They are literally coming faster than I can read them. I cannot read as fast as the rate at which they are arriving. I am overwhelmed. I will read all your replies over the next few weeks.
Sorry if you mentioned something important or missed some replies. I will try very hard to get to them. I always try to read all reply traffic for new articles.
I am also struck by how intelligent and well written the responses are.
I only read maybe 25% of comments so far, but I am struck by
– how different is everyone’s thinking
– how substantial — loaded with original thought — the comments are
– How well spoken are most of the authors, instead of “yeah I beleeeeve science” they gave long, open ended, and well articulated accounts
Keep them coming please
168ReplyCollapse
Writes Steve Kirsch’s newsletterApr 18Liked by Igor Chudov
Brilliant article. This is why Twitter had to ban me (twice). I actually got sucked into the narrative, but when my friends got injured, the math didn’t make any sense since those injuries would have been statistically unlikely. So my friends’ injuries was what got me to realize that “hey, this story they told us was a lie.”
854ReplyCollapse