Skip to content
Pro-Informed Choice Logo
  • Home
  • Freedom
  • Research
  • Action
  • Deep Dives
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Subscribe

Category: Vaxxed and Unvaxxed

Samoa Measles Outbreak

February 6, 2025March 25, 2025

Why is the Samoan Measles narrative relevant  today? 

There was a supposed outbreak of measles in Samoa in September 2019.  

The story provided to the World Press was that a child on holidays from New Zealand unknowingly had created an epidemic.

A ‘case’ of measles had been reported in the hospitals, which was taken to mean a spread had occurred. 

This was reported to be “catastrophic” because there was a low uptake of vaccinations for Measles. 

The uptake was hovering around 30% after the deaths of two babies after vaccination in 2018 

Two nurses were charged with manslaughter for supposedly a mix-up in vaccine preparation.

The President had suspended the use of the vaccine for 10 months against the WHO recommendations. 

The stage was set to play out a sequence for a Pandemic. 

Media Hype created the fear.

Lockdowns created the political response.

Vaccines were touted as the solution.

But in reality there were about 5700 cases and 83 deaths. 

The World was prepped and triggered into believing into the fear of contagion and the necessity of response. 

Part of the response was the attack on those who questioned what was going on. 

Edwin Tamasese, the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective, highlighted deaths in remote islands as occurring after  the vaccine, thus challenging its effectiveness and safety . 

The attack on Tamasese was part of an attempt to blame the death toll on mis-information from so-called ‘anti-vaxxers’. 

Questions were then raised about the quality of the Indian vaccine. 

At no time was RFK Jnr involved in these events. 

The sequence of events coincidentally paralleled what ultimately occurred during COVID. 

Conspiracy Theorists claim that the Samoan Measles ‘Outbreak’ was a trial run for all the COVID measures implemented on us only moths later. 

Here is a collation of reports below from the most recent back to the early history:

 

10 March, 2025 – The Measles Hoax – Exposing the virus delusion.

The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.

As described by a 1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.

 

 

5 January, 2025 – Fact-checking Mainstream Media: Did RFK Jr. Cause Measles Outbreak in Samoa That Killed 83 Children?

Some media reports suggested that if Kennedy wins the appointment for HHS secretary, outbreaks like the one in Samoa will likely occur in the U.S.

“It was a disaster and it was caused in large part by RFK Jr.,” Hawaii Gov. Josh Green told MSNBC news anchor Jonathan Capehart. “If he becomes our lead health official, you are going to see outbreaks like this in rural communities and cities across America. Children will die or have severe disabilities.”

However, a brief look into the timeline alone of events in Samoa shows that it “absolutely does not make sense” to blame the measles outbreak on Kennedy, according to Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco.

 

19 November, 2022 – The Killing Fields of Samoa

So let’s then turn to Samoa (and neighbouring Fiji and Tonga) in 2019. Here is the timeline

April 2019 – MMR relaunched in Samoa after a pause on the vaccination program in 2018 after two vaccine-related deaths of children. The vaccine program was poorly received by the Samoan population and uptake was low.
1st Oct 2019 – UNICEF delivered 135,000 doses of measles vaccines to Fiji, 110,500 doses of measles vaccines to Samoa (as well as supplies of vitamin A) and 12,000 doses of measles vaccines to Tonga
18th Oct 2019 – Samoa declares a measles outbreak.
24th Oct 2019 – Tonga declares a measles outbreak.
7th Nov 2019 – Fiji declares a measles outbreak (archive here)
15th Nov 2019 – State of emergency declared in Samoa after 1000 cases and 15 deaths (of which 14 were children under five)

Immediately the propaganda machine moves into action making the world believe that the problem is the fact that Samoa – for one year only – had a lower vaccination rate than the neighbouring islands…

 

Government of Samoa

@samoagovt

A total of 32,743 vaccinations were completed before the Mass Vaccination Campaign. Since the activation of the Campaign on 20 November 2019, the Ministry has successfully vaccinated 17,088 individuals. Free vaccinations continue to be administered for the below target groups

 

23 December, 2019 – Samoa Measles Emergency Extended

The MMR vaccine used in Samoa is produced by the Serum Institute of India. It has been approved and certified by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is an attenuated (weakened) live virus vaccine that is sold under the brand name Tresivac.8 9 10 11

Tresivac is contraindicated for people who are allergic to eggs, gelatin and neomycin or who have had a previous life-threatening reaction to any vaccine containing measles, mumps or rubella viruses. The Serum Institute’s MMR vaccine is also contraindicated for anyone who suffers from a chronic illness such as asthma or other breathing disorder, diabetes, kidney disease, or blood cell disorders such as anemia; or from severe immune suppression caused by disease (such as cancer, HIV, or AIDS), or who is receiving certain medicines such as steroids, chemotherapy or radiation. It is also contraindicated for pregnant women.12

According to the Serum Institute, there may be a problem with giving Tresivac to people with the following conditions: thrombocytopenia purpura (easy bruising or bleeding); active tuberculosis infection; a history of seizures; a neurologic disorder or disease affecting the brain (or if this was a reaction to a previous vaccine); and a weak immune system caused by disease, bone marrow transplant, or by using certain medicines or receiving cancer treatments. The vaccine might also cause problems for anyone who has received an immune globulin or other blood product within the past year or who has received a previous MMR vaccine within the previous 28 days.12

In October 2019, a one-year-old girl died two days after being administered Tresivac at a clinic in Cuba

 

15 December, 2019 – Measles in Samoa: Why are So Many Dying?

Samoa Vaccine Measles Deaths

In 2019, the leaders of Samoa closed its borders to travelers who did not have proof of vaccination records, including its own citizens. That hardline stance against measles means that for many American Baby Boomers who contracted measles as a child and have natural, true immunity and are either living in, or traveling to, Samoa must be given a jab against an infection their immune system had already conquered. The inoculation would not be solely for measles, but would also include a faulty attenuated mumps virus.

With more than fifty measles deaths claimed by the health experts in Samoa with the current outbreak, what is sadly no longer reported are the two deaths from MMR that rocked the Pacific Island nation in 2018. Two babies, less than two years of age, died shortly after receiving the MMR injection, causing an uproar. The Samoa prime minister “expressed his condolences” to the families and forced the country to temporarily pull the MMR vaccine from the market.

To the gasps of those who have had children injured by the MMR vaccine, Samoan authorities did not investigate what was wrong with the vaccine. Instead, authorities focused their probe on two nurses, charging them with two counts of manslaughter and declaring “nothing was wrong with the vaccine.” Month’s later, a still angry mother of one of the victims demanded “answers” for the death of her child. She clearly doesn’t believe the line of propaganda being sold to her as truth.

 

 

 15 December, 2019 – Vitamin A Shipped to Samoa 

Within Samoa, malnutrition is a “growing health concern, particularly for children.”15 Vitamin A treatment costs two or three pennies per dose9 and unlike vaccines, can be administered easily by parents or other providers because it does not require special training or refrigeration. While the vitamin A shipments by citizens to reduce complications in those with measles infections are disparaged in the press and social media, UNICEF has sent 30,000 vitamin A tablets along with 110,500 doses of measles containing vaccine to the island of Samoa.16

 

 

8 December, 2019 –   Samoan Government Arrests “Anti-Vaxxer” as Measles Campaign Widens                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Dec. 5, 2019, the Samoan government reportedly arrested a “vocal antivaccination campaigner” and charged him with “incitement” as the government widens a mass measles vaccination campaign in the small South Pacific island nation of about 200,000 people. More than 4,300 measles cases with 63 deaths have been reported since the measles outbreak began in mid-October.1

1 Al Jazeera (English). Samoa arrests anti-vaxxer as immunization drive continues. MSN Dec. 5, 2019.

 

Wikipedia – 2019 Samoa measles outbreak

Edwin Tamasese, a Samoan anti-vaccination activist with no medical training who was also the chair of a coconut farmers’ collective,[8] was charged with “incitement against a government order”.[44]

He had posted online comments like “Enjoy your killing spree.”[8] He encouraged people to refuse immunisation, as he believed the vaccine caused measles,[45] and even discouraged life-saving antibiotics.[8] Tamasese faced up to two years in prison.[8]

 

 

9 July, 2018 – Two Infants in Samoa Die After Getting the MMR Vaccine

Samoan government health officials have issued a recall of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine after two infants, a girl and a boy, died on July 6, 2018 just hours after being given the combination vaccine at Safotu Hospital on the island of f Savai’i in Samoa. 1 2 3 4

Testing is underway by the Samoan Ministry of Health to determine if the vaccines caused the deaths of the babies. Local police are conducting a separate investigation into the two cases.1 2 3 4

“We’ve ceased and sent out a directive to stop and cease all vaccinations of the children with the MMR,”1 said Samoa’s Director General of Health Leausa Toleafoa Dr. Take Naseri. 

 

 

12 July, 2018 – Samoa seizes all MMR vaccines after two infants die minutes after receiving the vaccine

TV1 in Samoa is reporting that two infants have died within minutes of receiving the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

Tala Fou brings you breaking news on the death of two young children both aged 1-year-old from the villages of Safotu and Sasina in Savaii. Both children died within minutes of being vaccinated with the MMR vacine at Safotu Hospital on Friday morning the 6th of July.

Our News Reporter Alisa Faamaoni met with both families in Savaii today. The parents of the first child Marietta and Samuelu Tuisuesue of Sasina explained in detail to Tala Fou that within three minutes of their 1-year-old daughter Lannacallystah Samuelu being injected with the MMR vaccine by a nurse she was dead. (Source.)

 

25 November, 2019 – Samoa’s Measles Outbreak and Response

Clearly, the nutritional status of a country matters when it comes to lowering mortality from measles. This has certainly been the case in the United States, where measles mortality rates in the U.S. dropped by more than 90 percent during the first half of the 20th century prior to the introduction of the first measles vaccine in 1963.19

Deaths from measles had decreased from 21 deaths per 1000 reported cases during 1911-1912 to less than one death per 1000 reported cases in 1953-1962. This improved measles morality rate was owed to several factors unrelated to the measles vaccine, including better sanitation and living conditions, as well as better nutrition and improved access to health care.19

19 Cáceres M. The Story of Measles’ Sharp Decline. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 12, 2016.

 

 

12 April, 2016 –  The Story of Measles’ Sharp Decline

In their book, Dissolving Illusions, Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries noted that the incidence of measles was also on a downward trend—albeit a much slower rate than the decline in mortality—before the 1963 measles vaccine. 8 We know, for example, that in 1954 there were 682,720 reported cases of measles in the U.S.13 This was followed by 555,156 cases in 1955; 611,936 in 1956; 486,799 in 1957; 763,094 in 1958; 406,162 in 1959; 441,703 in 1960; 423,919 in 1961; 481,530 in 1962; and 385,156 in 1963.13

While the number of reported cases of measles went up and down from year to year, the overall trend line was downward. In fact, the trend line had been going down since 1941, when the number of reported cases totaled 894,134.13

Interestingly, in 1964 (the year after the introduction of the first killed measles vaccine), the number of reported cases of measles actually went up to 458,083.13

Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries reasonably ask, “Was measles slowly becoming less prevalent anyway?”8

We know that measles can be sub-clinical 30 percent of the time, and the death rate had already plummeted. Like smallpox, was the disease slowly burning out? Was the rise in breastfeeding and improved nutrition contributing to fewer diagnosed cases? How many cases that were recorded as measles based on a clinical diagnosis really other viruses? Can we at all trust measles incidence statistics in the first place?8

If the trend continued as seen in the measles incidence graph, then measles incidence would have hit zero in the year 2000 without any vaccine program. Coincidentally, the year 2000 is the same year the CDC declared measles eliminated from the United States.8

 

More on Measles:

28 February, 2025 – Latest US Measles Outbreaks The Result of Failed Vaccines | Principia Scientific Intl.

A long history of measles vaccine failures
For over 25 years, outbreaks have been reported in populations with vaccination rates exceeding 95 percent, undermining the mainstream assumption that vaccines are the singular solution to measles control.

Here is a documented historical record of such vaccine failures:

  • 1985, Texas, U.S.: A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987 analyzed a measles outbreak in Corpus Christi, Texas, where 99 percent of students were vaccinated and more than 95 percent were immune. The researchers concluded: “Outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”

  • 1985, Montana, U.S.: An article in the American Journal of Epidemiology examined an outbreak of 137 measles cases in Montana, despite a 98.7 percent vaccination rate. The researchers stated: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”

  • 1988, Colorado, U.S.: A measles outbreak at a Colorado college infected 84 students, even though over 98 percent had documented immunity due to strict vaccination policies. Researchers concluded that “measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”

  • 1989, Quebec, Canada: Initially blamed on low vaccine coverage, a study published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health concluded: “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.”

  • 1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A study published in the Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical found that 76.4 percent of measles cases in this outbreak had been vaccinated before their first birthday.

  • 1992, Cape Town, South Africa: A study in the South African Medical Journal documented an outbreak where 91 percent of children were vaccinated, and vaccine efficacy was only 79 percent. The researchers concluded that primary and secondary vaccine failure contributed to the outbreak.

These are just a handful of examples from an extensive body of literature documenting measles outbreaks occurring in highly vaccinated populations — clear evidence that vaccine-induced immunity is neither lifelong nor consistently effective.

 

Vaccines – Efficacy

 

Natural Immunity

 

Shining a light on measles

This article is about measles alone. The combination MMR shot will be discussed separately. 

Highlights 

  • A long-held notion asserts that normal childhood illnesses ultimately strengthens the immune system; could that be true? 

  • We’ve been taught to fear illness, but should we? 

  • Shockingly, some scientists question what measles is. 

  • What does it mean to stop or eliminate measles? Do we really want to? 

  • Public health officials had come to a consensus that measles was a mild disease we should live with, but then decided measles was “important” when the vaccine was licensed, for the sole reason that we now had a product to sell for it. 

 

https://www.pro-informedchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Measles-Kids-stay-home-60s.mp4

 

 

Measles Fact Sheet 

https://healthfreedominstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Measles-Fact-Sheet.pdf

 

SIDS – Sudden Infant Deaths and Vaccines

February 5, 2025May 14, 2025

 

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has become a terrifying possibility for expecting parents

Parenting protocols have changed as a result.  Most parents subscribe to the Back To Sleep or Safe To Sleep Program.  This virtually mandates that:

Baby must sleep on the back

All blankets, quilts need to be minimised or removed along with toys etc to ‘avoid suffocation’

One piece ‘Onesie’s baby sleeping bags or swaddle cocoons, sleep suits are used

Monitoring devices are installed to provide constant surveillance

Many parents prefer to have the baby sleep with them on their chest or right next to them

All of these procedures are considered standard practice as the main culprits for causing SIDS are said to be Apn0ea or suffocation.

Vaccination Adverse Events are not considered to be cause or even correlation. 

The downsides of the Back To Sleep Program or Safe To Sleep as it is now rebranded are: 

It might reduces the incident of SIDs but it makes it almost impossible to get the child to sleep alone on their backs.   

As a result the babies are given ‘contact naps’ on or with the parent.   

The parent is supposed to stay awake. This limits the other daily necessary housework routines and in many cases is leading to parental sleep deprivation and exhaustion. 

Many parents co-sleep with their infant for years. This is okay if everyone is a good sleeper but an enormous stress if they are not. 

Unfortunately the elephant in the room is that Doctors will not discuss the possibility of increased risk of SIDS post-vaccines.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The following is a collation of scientific evidence in support of  SIDS as a Vaccine Adverse Event :   

 

 

 

Died Suddenly

“Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75% occurred within 7 days”

WAKE UP, AMERICA! Babies aren’t just spontaneously dying, they are dying because vaccines are killing them

 

12 May, 2025 – Safe to Sleep’ Never Reduced SIDS     

The NIH recently ended a ‘Safe to Sleep’ program that claimed to cut SIDS deaths in half, but was that really the case?

See video:  0 – 19:56 min. 

 

9 May, 2025 – The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths

Story at-a-glance

  • Multiple doctors have linked the DPT vaccine to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), noting that SIDS peaks coincide with vaccination schedules at 2, 4, and 6 months

  • Since at least 1933, the medical community has known that vaccines cause infant deaths. To conceal this, those deaths were renamed “crib death” and then “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” (SIDS), eventually being attributed to infants not sleeping on their backs

  • This revisionism is not supported by the existing evidence nor the historical changes in the frequency of SIDS. Most recently, SIDS rates have had an unprecedented decrease in tandem with the COVID-19 lockdowns reducing vaccination rates

  • The vaccine most strongly associated with SIDS, DPT, was protected for decades by the government despite knowing a large body of evidence around the world showed it killed infants — particularly when an inevitable hot lot was released. Eventually, so many injury lawsuits were filed that in 1986, the government had to give blanket immunity to the vaccine manufacturers

  • This article will review the body of evidence showing vaccines cause SIDS and reveal the mechanism modern research has now repeatedly proven causes vaccines to trigger infant death

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2025/May/PDF/vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-deaths-pdf.pdf

 

 

24 June, 2021 – Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature

Although there is considerable evidence that a subset of infants has an increased risk of sudden death after receiving vaccines, health authorities eliminated “prophylactic vaccination” as an official cause of death, so medical examiners are compelled to misclassify and conceal vaccine-related fatalities under alternate cause-of-death classifications. 

Of 2605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019, 58 % clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 78.3 % occurred within 7 days post-vaccination, confirming that infant deaths tend to occur in temporal proximity to vaccine administration. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). A review of the medical literature substantiates a link between vaccines and sudden unexplained infant deaths

While the findings in this paper are not proof of an association between infant vaccines and infant deaths, they are highly suggestive of a causal relationship.

 

14 March, 2025 – VaersAware.com Just Found The Most Clever Way VAERS Hides SIDS and Other Sudden Deaths!

Simply delete the symptoms codes after publication…

These 261 reports produced about 1,563 symptoms that were previous on reports but now have mysteriously vanished. 53 of these 261 reports are DEATH reports, many of which are Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The “top 30 symptoms” deleted account for 421 of 1,563 (27%).

 

 

May 4, 2023 – ‘More Vaccine Doses Linked to Higher Rate of Infant Mortality’; Multiple vaccines administered concurrently have also been shown to increase mortality. In all nations, a causal relationship between vaccines and sudden infant deaths is rarely acknowledged. Yet, physiological studies have provided biological plausibility by showing that infant vaccines can cause serious health conditions’

‘A recent peer-reviewed study published in the medical journal Cureus provided evidence for a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses given to babies and infant mortality rates. The study confirmed a 2011 study conducted by the same researchers, which found a positive correlation between the greater number of vaccines given to infants in the most highly developed nations and a higher infant mortality rate.1 2

https://palexander.substack.com/p/more-vaccine-doses-linked-to-higher

 

May 15, 2023 – More Vaccine Doses Linked to Higher Infant Mortality    

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/05/more-vaccine-doses-linked-to-higher-rate-of-infant-mortality/

More Vaccine Doses Linked to Higher Rate of Infant Mortality – The Vaccine Reaction

The initial study published in 2011 in Human and Experimental Toxicology evaluated 2009 data from developed and under-developed nations around the world and found that the greatest number of infant deaths occurred in developed nations where infants were given the highest number of vaccine doses, totaling between 21 to 26 doses. The United States gives infants under the age of one year 26 doses of vaccines—the highest number of vaccine doses of all nations.3 4

Critics of the initial study claimed that the researchers did not use “the full dataset” available for all 185 nations in reaching their conclusion. In the recent study, the authors of both studies, Gary Goldman, PhD and Neil Miller, conducted several investigations to test the reliability of their earlier findings in light of the claims made by critics. They reviewed the methodology, analysis, reported results and conclusion made by their critics, as well as provided odds ratio, sensitivity and replication analysis.

Both Studies Confirm That More Vaccination is Associated With Higher Infant Mortality

Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database.pdf
 

 

*References:

1 Goldman GS, Miller NZ. Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates: A Response to Critics. Cureus Feb. 2, 2023; 15(2): e34566.
2 Nevradakis M. Higher Infant Mortality Rates Linked to Higher Number of Vaccine Doses, New Study Confirms. The Defender Feb. 7, 2023.

3 Ibid.
4 Goldman GS, Miller NZ. Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates: A Response to Critics. Cureus Feb. 2, 2023; 15(2): e34566.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 Nevradakis M. Higher Infant Mortality Rates Linked to Higher Number of Vaccine Doses, New Study Confirms. The Defender Feb. 7, 2023.
8 Miller NZ. Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature. Toxicology Reports Vol. 8, 2021.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
11 Fisher BL. In Memoriam: Infant Deaths & Vaccination. NVIC Vaccine News. May 24, 2011.
12 Goldman GS. Positive Correlation between the Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality. Orthomolecular Science Feb. 22, 2023.

Fully Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Part 2

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated — Part 2

Fully-Vaccinated-vs.-Unvaccinated-Part-2.pdf

Full-sized part 2 slides

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Full-Presentation-Parts-I-VII

© 07/01/19 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource links are provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

Clustering of cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus occurring 2-4 years after vaccination..pdf

Risk of Vaccine Induced Diabetes in Children with a Family History of Type 1 Diabetes..pdf

Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism Abstract..pdf

A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccine..pdf

A cross-sectional study of the relationship between reported human papillomavirus vaccine exposure..pdf

Premature Puberty and Thimerosal-Containing Hepatitis B Vaccination..pdf

Is measles vaccination a risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease? The Lancet Abstract.. pdf

 

 

 

 

 

Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated — Part 3

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

Fully Vaccinated v. Unvaccinated — Part 3

Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 3 • Children’s Health Defense

Full-sized Part 3 Slides

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Full-Presentation Parts 1-7

© 07/17/19 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource links are provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

A cross-sectional study of the relationship between infant Thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccine.. Abstract.pdf

Verstraeten-1999-Increased-risk-of-developmental-neurologic-impairment..pdf

Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine..pdf

Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (HINI)..pdf

Safety concerns with human papilloma virus immunization in Japan..pdf

Thimerosal exposure and disturbance of emotions specific to childhood and adolescence.pdf

Thimerosal exposure and disturbance of emotions specific to childhood and adolescence..Abstract pdf

Human papillomavirus vaccination of adult women and risk of autoimmune and.pdf

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons..pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated — Part 4

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

 

Fully Vaccinated v. Unvaccinated — Part 4

Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 4 • Children’s Health Defense.pdf

Full-sized Part 4 Slides Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated.pdf

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Full-Presentation-Parts-I-VII

© 07/26/19 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource links are provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

Increased childhood incidence of narcolepsy in western Sweden after H1N1 influenza vaccination..pdf

Evaluation of the Association of Maternal Pertussis Vaccination With Obstetric..pdf

Intussusception Risk and Health Benefits of Rotavirus Vaccination in Mexico and Brazil _ NEJM..pdf

Measles and atopy in Guinea-Bissau – ScienceDirect..pdf

Early Thimerosal Exposure and Neuropsychological Outcomes at 7 to 10 Years _ NEJM..pdf

Delay in diptheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccination is associated with a risk of childhood..pdf

Thimerosal exposure & increasing trends of premature puberty in the vaccine safety datalink..pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated – Part 6

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

Vaccinated v. Unvaccinated — Part 6

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 6 • Children’s Health Defense.pdf

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Presentation-Part-6-Full-Size.pdf

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Full-Presentation-Parts-I-VII.pdf

© 11/o5/19 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource links are provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

The relationship between vaccine refusal and self-report of atopic disease in children..pdf

Sex-differential and non-specific effects of routine vaccinations in a rural area..Abstract ..pdf

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis..pdf

Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunization and sudden infant death syndrome..pdf

 

 

 

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Part 9

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

Vaccinated v. Unvaccinated — Part 9

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 9 • Children’s Health Defense.pdf

Full-sized part 9 slides.pdf

Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Parts-1-9.pdf

© 05/01/20 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource link is provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

Risk of narcolepsy in children and young people receiving AS03 adjuvanted pandemic A H1N1..pdf

Inflammatory Responses to Trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccine Among Pregnant Women..pdf

Inflammation‐related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet..pdf

Vaccine-induced anti-HA2 antibodies promote virus fusion and enhance influenza virus respiratory dis..pdf

Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests..pdf

Primary Immunization of Premature Infants with Gestational Age 35 Weeks Cardiorespiratory Comp..pdf

 

 

 

 

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Part 10

June 17, 2024June 17, 2024

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 10

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated—Part 10 • Children’s Health Defense

Full-sized part 10 slides.pdf

Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed parts 1-10.pdf

© 06/04/20 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

The following related resource link is provided by Pro-informed Choice for educational use:

Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children..pdf

 

 

 

 

20 million lives saved from ‘The Vaccine’?

August 17, 2023August 22, 2023

An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of COVID ‘vaccines’.                                                                                                                                                              Where is the evidence for this? How sound is it? Where is the risk benefit analysis? How many lives saved compared to how many excess deaths caused or at least strongly associated with the COVID injections worldwide? 

Here is the article: 

23 June, 2022 – Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study

Findings: Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7-15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1-20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination. 

24 June, 2022 – COVID vaccines saved 20M lives in 1st year, scientists say,

According to a study published Thursday. June 23, 2022 in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year, but even more deaths could have been prevented if global targets had been reached. (Pfizer via AP)

A bright red flag is here:

“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”

There are clear conflicts of interest in the funding from bodies directly invested in the vaccine industry such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.

Imperial College London are the original modellers that grossly over-estimated the expected GOVID deaths leading to policies and practices based on unrealistic fear. They predicted over half a million deaths in the UK and over 2 million deaths in the US. They had a vested interest in balancing the books with a model that produced an outcome with strikingly similar number of ‘lives saved’. 

WHO (World Health Organisation) are funded heavily by the Gates Foundation. They are at present lobbying to have global oversight over all future pandemics. Changes to the IHR (International Health Regulations, if successful will give them unprecedented powers including mandating vaccination in all member countries. 

24 June, 2022 – Did Covid Vaccines Save Tens of Millions of Lives?

A recent preprint, with the now questionable Medical Journal Lancet, makes the claim that the Covid vaccine introduction in December 2020 actually prevented tens of millions of deaths worldwide. 

This paper was submitted by the research group headed by Azra Ghani from the Imperial College of London. Dr. Ghani acts as a consultant for HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline, and the WHO and as with her other Imperial College colleagues, has been pro-lockdown/pro-panic, and pro-vaccine for more than two years.

20 August, 2022 – 20 million saved or 20 million killed

A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:

“C. Population Susceptibility 

The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”

“The mathematical models that have been presented from Imperial College have always been wildly WRONG.”

In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.

analysis-of-covid19-vaccination-effectiveness

10 August, 2023 – MORE HARM THAN GOOD Clear evidence for all to see

In defence of the unprecedented numbers of reported deaths and serious adverse effects following the Covid injections, the pro-vax “health experts” always retreat to the mythical “20 million lives saved” claim without providing any evidence. 

CLICK HERE to view a paper by Makeover, T. et al entitled “Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness” which was published in May 2023. I quote from this paper:

“By comparing graphs of the intensity of vaccination and the rate of mortality, we see periods of intense vaccination are followed by periods of higher excess mortality. Basic statistical data confirm that COVID-19 vaccines increased the mortality rate” and “it has confirmed that the vaccinated part of the global population has an increased mortality rate of about 14.5% with respect to the non-vaccinated population cohort”.

and here are the numbers from the paper:

Infection fatality ratio  (IFR): 

The proportion of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 who die from COVID-19. 

Oz Dave

Writes Oz’s Substack

Aug 10: 

20 million lives saved? Here are quite recent pre-vaccination IFR data on Covid-19 in the young and working-age population:

“The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”

“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0–59 and 0–69 year old people, respectively.”

‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’

Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.

1 January 2023

Fig. 2. Box plot of infection fatality rate (IFR) estimates across countries per each specified age bin. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X?fbclid=IwAR1GIE6yltX_kEbcE5Md1yVjynYoZgwd6dFbz3Qd-2-z8agqm_Ude4cncHI

Vaccine Skeptics are the True Critical Thinkers – Igor Chudov

August 17, 2022August 30, 2022

Vaccine Skeptics are the True Critical Thinkers

We Overcame the Most Sophisticated Forms of Manipulation

Igor Chudov
Apr 18
1,582
2,763

This post is the first in my future series, on how governments and shady non-governmental players psychologically manipulated us during the Covid-19 crisis. In this series, I will highlight various dirty tricks and explain why most people fell for them, one per post.

First, a little personal anecdote.

Richard Thaler is a brilliant behavioral economist, Nobel Prize winner, and a major contributor to the “Nudge Theory”, that provided impetus for the infamous UK “Nudge Unit”. His work on human decision making and cognitive biases was groundbreaking and, in part, helped governments worldwide to hypnotize most people into taking “Covid Vaccines”.

Richard Thaler, around 1999, also taught my favorite class “Decision Making”. He was my favorite professor at the University of Chicago, where I was an MBA student. He taught us a lot about ways that exist to hijack our decision making and how our adversaries use our subconscious biases to make us make wrong decisions — as well as how we can use these manipulations to our own advantage in business.

What I learned in that class was helpful throughout my entire life, affected many investment and business decisions, helped me convert prospects to paying customers, avoid several stockmarket crashes, and much more. This same decision making class possibly saved my life, because it made me able to recognize and resist Covid vaccine propaganda and manipulation. Prof. Thaler ended up on the wrong side of history, supporting Covid vaccine propaganda and the nudge units, but his teachings made me able to recognize manipulation, and resist it.

Thinking about that made me appreciative of people who never took any such class, often had no formal education, and yet they made the right choice instinctively. These people, many of whom are my readers, are worthy of admiration, if for no other reason than remarkable independence of thinking and a clear mind in a very confusing, dangerous, and rapidly shifting situation.

My future posts will go through various psychological manipulation concepts and how they were applied, by shady actors and co-opted governments, and how they affected each of us.

The Asch Experiment

“All experts agree that the vaccine is safe and effective. ”

That was enough to get most people vaccinated. Except that anyone could ask two questions:

  • How can I know that all experts agree, if those disagreeing are not allowed to speak up?
  • How can anyone know that “Covid vaccine” is safe and effective, if no time actually passed to ensure that?

Finally, someone with just a bit of knowledge could also ask a question, “are you sure that it is safe and effective, if no coronavirus vaccine ever worked, and no mRNA product was ever approved”?

The Asch Experiment, conducted by Solomon Asch, found out that most people, when seeing a “consensus” of participants agreeing on something that is fairly obviously false, actually ends up agreeing with those false opinions just because everyone else seems to think so.

 

The experiment was originally set up with eight persons, only one of whom was an experimental subject, and the rest were actors. These stooges, who the subject thought were other subjects, were all asked the same question, to which they gave an obviously wrong answer. The subject, who did not know he was the only real subject, was to speak up last.

It turned out that subjects of this experiment (it was repeated multiple times), seeing a consensus of seven smartly dressed men, would end up giving the same (obviously incorrect) answer as the stooges. This conformance experiment literally was a clever way to make people hold and express obviously false opinions.

This experiment was repeated many times, and in the most skillfully conducted experiments, they got 62.5% of subjects to agree with obvious nonsense at least once.

Oddly enough, vaccination rate in the US on Sep 1, right before federal vaccine mandates started, was 62.3%. Vaccination was running out of steam, just as Delta was showing that vaccines were not really “effective”.

It is at this time, on September 2, Richard Thaler concluded that “a nudge is not enough”.

Seeing a slowdown and a dip in confidence, vaccinators realized that they need to do more than mere manipulation with fake “expert opinion”. Vaccine mandates and hate propaganda supplanted “nudges” to drive vaccination forward. That will be discussed in other posts.

We literally lived through a worldwide Asch experiment. Every newspaper, TV station, every YouTube recommended video, kept telling us how the vaccine was “safe and effective” and how “all experts agree”. We were constantly force fed these “expert opinions” nonstop.

Enormous efforts were spent to silence “misinformation”. Why? Because Solomon Asch found out that any expression of disagreement — lack of consensus — immediately kills compliance:

Regarding mRNA “Covid vaccines”: anyone who would think for a minute, would realize that there was not a way to know for sure that vaccines were safe and effective, simply because not enough time has passed. Similarly, anyone could see that the masterminds behind the lockdowns and vaccinations, the billionaires behind the scenes, and the corrupt governments, all ensured that any dissent would be silenced. Thus, the purported consensus did not, in fact, exist at all.

The minority of people saw through that, decided accordingly, and refused vaccination. Who was that? You, my readers. What made you decide this? I am sure that there were just as many reasons as people here. The main factor is that you all took a few minutes to think about it critically. You were independently minded and decided to think for yourselves.

  • Was it your general distrust of the government?
  • Was is your deep knowledge of virology and molecular biology?
  • Was it your experience with wheeling and dealing, exposure to scams and knowing how con men operate?
  • Was it your ability to think independently without needing people to agree with you?

Even those who took the shots, and saw the light later, are critical thinkers. What is important is seeing the light — not necessarily the timing of when you saw the light.

To those who survived The Global Asch Experiment, congratulations. Please share what made you hold out, below — Why did you NOT get the shot?

Share

P.S. Richard Thaler, a brilliant professor, author, and theoretician in the cognitive bias field, is not an evil mastermind of vaccination. He was merely one of many players, minutely related to me, and the author of concepts that played out in the pandemic. I do NOT want to create a wrong impression of my favorite college professor being someone like “Dr Evil of Covid-19”. He was not Dr Evil. But his theories are incredibly important to the story.

1,582 likes
1,582
2,763
2,763 Comments

author
Igor Chudov

Apr 19·edited May 2Pinned

Your responses are incredible. They are literally coming faster than I can read them. I cannot read as fast as the rate at which they are arriving. I am overwhelmed. I will read all your replies over the next few weeks.

Sorry if you mentioned something important or missed some replies. I will try very hard to get to them. I always try to read all reply traffic for new articles.

I am also struck by how intelligent and well written the responses are.

I only read maybe 25% of comments so far, but I am struck by

– how different is everyone’s thinking

– how substantial — loaded with original thought — the comments are

– How well spoken are most of the authors, instead of “yeah I beleeeeve science” they gave long, open ended, and well articulated accounts

Keep them coming please

168ReplyCollapse

115 replies by Igor Chudov and others
Steve Kirsch

Writes Steve Kirsch’s newsletterApr 18Liked by Igor Chudov

Brilliant article. This is why Twitter had to ban me (twice). I actually got sucked into the narrative, but when my friends got injured, the math didn’t make any sense since those injuries would have been statistically unlikely. So my friends’ injuries was what got me to realize that “hey, this story they told us was a lie.”

854ReplyCollapse

453 replies by Igor Chudov and others

2761 more comments…

TopNewCommunity

AIDS-Like “Chronic Covid” is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZThe Boosted Cannot Clear Covid Easily and Keep Getting Reinfected

IGOR CHUDOV
APR 10
635
757

Vaccine Shedding Finally Proven!Statistically Significant Vaccine Shedding from Parents to Children

IGOR CHUDOV
MAY 3
716
787

Sars-Cov-2 Kills T-Cells, Just Like HIVIt also works like HIV, via LFA-1 T-cell Receptors and gp120

IGOR CHUDOV
MAR 14
373
283

See all

Posts pagination

1 2 Next
GET FREE UPDATES

Recent Posts

  • The Day Tapes April 1, 2025
  • Pro-Informed Choice E Book March 6, 2025
  • Elections Australia 2025 March 3, 2025
  • German New Medicine February 23, 2025
  • Samoa Measles Outbreak February 6, 2025
  • SIDS – Sudden Infant Deaths and Vaccines February 5, 2025
  • Birth In a Natural World December 18, 2024
  • Corruption – US Election 2024 November 29, 2024
  • Fully Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Part 2 June 17, 2024
  • Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated — Part 3 June 17, 2024

Archives

  • April 2025 (1)
  • March 2025 (2)
  • February 2025 (3)
  • December 2024 (1)
  • November 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (7)
  • April 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (2)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • October 2023 (2)
  • August 2023 (6)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • June 2023 (5)
  • May 2023 (4)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • March 2023 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (3)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (5)
  • November 2021 (3)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (8)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (3)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (17)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • November 2020 (7)
  • October 2020 (6)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (6)

[cm_form form_id='cm_60f0edc63a911']

© Copyright 2020 Pro-Informed Choice
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Statement