Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.
But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level? Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you.
And if not the vaccine, why did Hepatitis B cases plummet after 1991? Dr. Nevison addressed that question, too.
The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time. At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.
I’m watching and listening to the ACIP meeting as I write and construct this article. I doubt any of those ACIP professionals have seen this next graph of VAERS identifiable deaths by days from vax date to death date:
Dr. Nevison, a CDC consultant, presented actual data on Hep B incidence, and compared it with CDC models (especially the Armstrong model) which exaggerate predicted cases (by a factor of 100 when compared with CDC’s actual numbers) if vaccine is not given to every baby.
61% of Alaskans vaccinated as children over 5 still showed antibody titers 30 years later, but only about half vaccinated at earlier ages still had antibodies 30 years later. The issue is that there is no good evidence that vaccinating very early will in fact protect through adulthood.
And sure enough, what age groups are currently developing Hep B in the US? Ages 40-60! Her analysis of CDC data also showed that the newborn vaccine program made no visible difference to the downward trend in new Hep B cases that began long before the programstarted.
What doctors fail tell you, which doesn’t make sense, is that you’re injecting a newborn baby to protect them from a disease that occurs in “drug addicts and people who have risky sex.”
The Hep B vaccine given to babies also contains FIVE TIMES the amount of aluminum deemed safe for adults
Most parents don’t realise that the Hepatitis B vaccine is given within hours of birth — for a disease that spreads primarily through adult behaviours.
⚠️ No placebo-controlled trials
⏱️ Babies monitored for just 4–5 days in studies
📉 70% of reported vaccine-related deaths occurred in children under 3
💉 Mercury and aluminium exposures
🧠 Animal studies showing neurodevelopmental harm
This isn’t about fear. It’s about facts. 📥 Visitinform-me.orgto access the full module, download the companion fact sheet, and watch expert interviews.
Author Arthur Allen observed that when the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for infants, “resistance to vaccination began to grow from a tiny hard core of ideological opponents into a larger, more mainstream group of skeptics. … Parents who found no fault with vaccination in general could still question whether the new injections were necessary.”62
“Others felt, complacently perhaps, that they would not be raising children who would ever be putting themselves at risk of hepatitis B or that their child could get the shot later.”63
“Many Americans, it seemed, didn’t like being asked to take a risk of any kind to prevent a disease they believed they could prevent perfectly well themselves.”64
ICAN is supporting an initiative that is long overdue: suing doctors and hospitals that inject newborns with a hepatitis B vaccine without parental consent.
The hepatitis B vaccine is a case study in agency capture. The target for this product was sex workers and intravenous drug users, and the rare pregnant mother who was hepatitis B positive. The problem was that CDC could not get the sex workers and intravenous drug users to take this product. The story would have ended there if pharma didn’t stand to earn billions through a wider mandate of this product.
WHY is the Hep B shot given to every newborn in the US but not in other industrialized countries? Could it be contributing to the US having the highest first day infant mortality rate and infant mortality rate? This episode originally aired on CHD Tv
Hepatitis-B is a viral attack on the liver that is transmitted through sex, shared hypodermic needles, and iatrogenic (medical) exposure. It’s a bodily fluid transmitted virus that often occurs among those engaging in “risky behavior.”�?The Hep-B vaccination (HBV) is administered at or near birth and again between three and six months of age. It’s the beginning of a lengthy runway of hazardous pediatric vaccinations recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Hep-B vaccination – A Danger to Infants
If vaccines worked safely, it would be prudent to screen expectant women for hepatitis-B and exclude unnecessary Hep-B vaccinations for newborns. Maybe a Hep-B vaccination would make any sort of sense for a newborn whose mother tested positive for hepatitis-B.
Except Hep-B Vaccinations Don’t Work and They are Very Dangerous
There are examples of acute hepatitis-B among those who had been vaccinated. Those examples were from “high risk” adults, young and promiscuous, and some who were exposed to hepatitis-B in clinics and hospitals (iatrogenic exposure).
The announced removal of mercury adjuvants is a public relations distraction. Mercury based thimerosal has been replaced with aluminum hydroxide, which also creates serious adverse neurological effects.
Ironically, there is evidence of almost immediate liver damage from HBV shots. Several animal studies with low dose Hep-B vaccines have been published since the 1990s.
A recent study discovered gene mutations that led to liver cell death. This study noted that vaccine manufacturers don’t test for gene mutations in their safety tests. All the studies were reported in peer reviewed journals.
How does all this affect helpless infants undergoing the CDC’s rigorous vaccination schedule beginning at or near birth with the Hep-B vaccination?
Renowned neurosurgeon and author Dr. Russell Blaylock puts it this way: “Because the child’s brain is undergoing a period of rapid growth from the third trimester of pregnancy until age 2 years, his or her brain is at considerable risk from this insane policy” [infant vaccinations].
The statistical evidence of rapidly rising autism and SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) is overwhelming. Yet only five percent of adverse events (at best) get reported to the adverse event reporting system (AERS), making it easier for the CDC to claim their low risk to benefit vaccine ratios.
Even with those cooked books, adverse effects and deaths from HBV vaccines greatly outnumber the hepatitis-B infections and deaths among children between 10 and 14 years of age, considered the earliest age span for hepatitis-B from “high risk behavior.”
One would get a realistic adverse event statistic by multiplying what is reported by almost ten. Most affected adversely don’t know about AERS. Others don’t want to bother with the level of effort required, while many doctors prefer to deny giving a shot that destroyed a child’s life.
The CDC has steadily increased the vaccination schedule since the late 1970s, inserting the Hep-B vaccination�?shot in the 1990s. Autism has skyrocketed by almost 90 percent in three decades. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has also jumped dramatically within the USA, which is leading industrialized nations in that category.
A number of peer-reviewed studies have also found a relationship between the hep-B vaccinations�?and infant deaths both in the U.S. and Europe. With links to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS),multiple sclerosis, and numerous chronic autoimmune disorders, some doctors are speaking out against the dangers of the hep B vaccine.
Nevertheless, mainstream medicine overall still constantly promotes vaccine safety and efficacy for HBV shots and all others. They continually dismiss those statistics as not scientific evidence for causality; while freely using epidemiology statistics, often manipulated, for their purposes.
Don’t fall for their spin. Spare your child’s future, and yours, the agony of constant suffering and medical care from adverse vaccine injury damage. If a pregnant woman doesn’t have hepatitis-B, the Hep-B vaccination�?shouldn’t even be considered.
Vaccinations are risky at any age. Before two years, when HBV vaccinations are scheduled, negative health results are highly probable later if not sooner.
[SaneVax: Despite the fact that hepatitis B is most commonly transmitted to infants via their infected mothers, the CDC recommends a 3 dose series of hepatitis B vaccinations beginning on the first day of life. Would it not make sense to test the birth mothers to determine the infant was at risk of contracting the disease prior to deciding whether vaccination is the right choice?]
Federal Court Admits Hepatitis B Vaccine Caused Fatal Auto-Immune Disorder
By Elizabeth Renter
Hepatitis B at birth worth the cost?
In our society today, newborns are injected with loads of chemicals nearly as soon as they enter the world. In the name of “prevention”, we give them vaccines that we aren’t even sure are safe. As a matter of fact, in many cases, we know them to be unsafe. This is the case with the hepatitis B vaccine, approved for infants at birth but admittedly responsible for causing serious illness and even death.
The United States Court of Federal Claims sided with the estate of Tambra Harris, who died as a result of an auto-immune disease called systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The court awarded $475,000 following her death after finding the hepatitis vaccine caused her injury in the form of SLE. But this near-admittance of a cause-effect relationship between the vaccine and the illness and subsequent death isn’t enough. No, we still give the shot to babies.
So, what is hepatitis B and why are we told that it is so important that newborn infants are vaccinated against it? Hepatitis B is not pleasant and can be deadly. But newborns (and the vast majority of people at any age) aren’t at risk of contracting the disease. It’s spread by contact with bodily fluids, as in through unprotected sex or dirty needles.
The risks associated with the hepatitis B vaccine are far more pressing than the risk of contracting the disease, says Dr. Jane Orient of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). “For most children, the risk of a serious vaccine reaction may be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B.”
The hepatitis B vaccine triples the risk of developing multiple sclerosis
Hernán MA, Jick SS, et al. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis: A prospective study. Neurology 2004 Sep 14; 63(5): 838-42.
“These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis.” – Some previous studies that evaluated a potential link between the hepatitis B vaccine and an increased risk of multiple sclerosis had significant methodological limitations. – In this study, the General Practice Research Database (GPRD), containing comprehensive medical records from clinical practice in the United Kingdom, was utilized to compare 163 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis to 1,604 randomly selected controls. – Patients with multiple sclerosis were 3 times more likely to have been vaccinated against hepatitis B within 3 years before the date of first symptoms when compared to controls who were not vaccinated (odds ratio, OR = 3.1).
Miller, Neil Z.. Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies (p. 168).
Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002
Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1–9 years
Premature Puberty and Thimerosal-Containing Hepatitis B Vaccination: A Case-Control Study in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis_ a prospective study – Abstract
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Association between Infant Hepatitis B Vaccine Exposure in Boys and the Risk of Adverse Effects as Measured by Receipt of Special Education Services Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002
Acclaimed Prosecutor, PM advisor, victim advocate 20yrs+ turned whistleblower: I UN-covered a plot to use indigenous rights as a device to asset-strip the world
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax:
In 2020, we started investigating thevirus modeland came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-calledTobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properlycontrolled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement.
The narratives stemming from virology’s pseudoscience are now used to control populations in every possible way by keeping them in a state of fear. The phantom “viruses” and the invented “countermeasures” also enable vast transfers of wealth from the public to governments and their favoured friends, while allowingreal and sickening globalist agendasto roll on. It is therefore more important than ever to help more people see beyond the virus model, both for their own health and the future of humanity. While for some individuals this requires a scientific treatise such as Mark’sA Farewell to Virology, for many others they simply want to know, “if it’s not a virus, what’s making me sick then?” In this video, I answer that question with my top 40 reasons…
In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of theAlliance for Human Research Protectionsent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary“Never Again is Now Global”.
The task for our chapter was to “unmask the viral paradigm” and bidA Farewell to Virologyin non-technical language, while still citing scientific reports.
Our essay provides the overview of how the “pandemic” was staged and in some ways is a summary of part of our latest book,The Final Pandemic.
Jerm and Dr Tom Cowan discuss the COVID pandemic, questioning virus myths and medical authority. They highlight flawed virus isolation, unreliable PCR testing, and the body’s natural healing. They explore detoxification, challenge contagion theories, and debunk myths about bacteria, rabies, and the immune system. They stress the need for a scientifically literate society to build a healthier culture.
In this episode, Alec explores the misconceptions surrounding infectious diseases and reframes how we understand sickness. He examines the role of belief in health, gaps in virus research, and alternative reasons for individual and group illness. Discover insights into biofield interactions, the intelligence of water as it relates to our body, and how shifting your perspective can unlock new paths to wellness.
What if viruses don’t exist at all? – In this explosive interview, Dr. Tom Cowan — longtime physician and author of The Contagion Myth — makes the shocking case that everything we know about viruses and germ theory is wrong. – He says illness comes from toxins, not contagion — and mainstream science doesn’t want you to hear it. – Watch now and decide for yourself: medical truth-teller or dangerous heretic?
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 @KimIversenShow I spoke with Dr Tom Cowan who challenges the idea that viruses even exist. What he says may be controversial, but it will definitely get you thinking👇 https://x.com/KimIversenShow/status/1907086569544036726
This video, presented by Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., provides an in-depth analysis of the standard “Virus”-theory in the context of German New Medicine (GNM). More information is available athttps://learninggnm.com.
The findings of this investigation align with what is seen in the published literature. Find all of the official documents (FOIs) and emails with virologists here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
In this dynamic interview, Christine Massey shares her groundbreaking research into the issue of whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, as well as the broader question as to whether any “virus” has been proven to exist.
Christine Massey has a master’s degree in bio-statistics and has worked in cancer research.
The controversy over whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, is confusing to most people, but Ms. Massey pursued a route that was purely objective in doing this research. She submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to 213 medical institutions in 40 different countries asking them for documents that proved that the COVID virus has been purified and proven to exist. The responses she received from these institutions were absolutely shocking and draws into question everything they have been telling the public!
By Enders’ own admission, both in his 1954 paper and in public statements, critical links in thelogical chain of causationwere absent.
In formal terms, these criteria—summarized asKoch’s Postulates—require that the suspected microorganism be consistently found in all cases of disease, isolated independently of host material in pure culture, shown to reproduce the disease when introduced into a healthy host, and then recovered from that experimentally induced illness. Enders’ own evidence makes it clear that even the first two steps (consistency in cases and isolation in pure culture) were not fully satisfied, and the final steps (disease reproduction and re-isolation) remained unperformed at the time his findings were publicly declared a discovery.
Another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature
My order was for:
All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. – that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged “avian influenza virus” (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in “host” cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or
2. – that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be “avian influenza virus” directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called “hosts”, with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or
3. – wherein the purported “genome” of any alleged “avian influenza virus” was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a “host” (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or
4. – that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported “avian influenza viruses”. My July 21, 2024FOIA orderfiled with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.
The person most likely to have died from a “virus” just so happen to be Military aged Males… No these men were not dying because of the bullets and bombs, chemical agents and stuff, they were all accounted for and the ones that survived just so happened to, as soon as the war ended, get a cold, keeled over and died. The average age of normal “seasonal Flu” deaths is ~80yrs old, so by some complete random chance this “transmissible pathogen” STILL killed predominantly military aged men, despite the total number of deaths being 5 times that of deaths directly attributed to war, in absolute contradiction to every other “virus” in history.
The Rosenau Study
They took 100 hundred healthy men between the ages of 18-30 yrs old. This corresponds exactly to the claimed average age of “Spanish Flu” deaths being 28yrs old. They stipulate in the study that they believe them to be of a “susceptible” age. This is in stark contrast to every other Contagion Study ever conducted. Usually they deem the most “susceptible” ages to be too vulnerable and too risky to experiment on, given that the average age of death for all other supposed respiratory viruses is nearly 80 yrs old.
They made sure to select men who had experienced no recent respiratory infection so the rescue device of “immunity” when they inevitably fail the contagion study does not apply in this instance.
They put the fluids obtained from people said to be dying with “Spanish Flu” directly up the nostrils of these healthy volunteers. Starting with a “moderate amount” which returned negative results. Then they turned up the heat by putting a “very large quantity” of fluids contained from the lungs of deceased patients died supposedly of “Spanish Flu”.
The DAMNING evidence is in the DIRECT contagion studies carried out. The Rosenau studies in my opinion are the most devastating studies to Germ Theory ever produced. When you actually look at it they were not just studying “viruses” because it wasn’t a supposed “purified Viral Culture” they were inoculating with, these contain antibiotics which kill bacteria, parasites and fungi.
These studies showed that CONTAGION of ANY pathogen is a myth as they were taking the fluids direct from sick people and transferring them to healthy people, bacteria, parasites and all.
No one has valid scientific evidence to show that “avian influenza virus” H5N1 (or any other alleged “virus”) even exists. I challenge anyone to prove me wrong by citing such evidence.
Resources for farmers
For anyone approached by government agents who want to test for (imagined) viruses in their livestock, the Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) created anAction Alert formthat can be given to the agents before allowing them entry to the land. The form requires the agent(s) to identify themselves and to cite valid scientific evidence of the alleged virus in question, as well as contagion of the relevant illness and validation of the tests.
– As we delve into Alec Zeck’s 2.5-hour presentation, Reframing the Infectious Disease Paradigm* , we encounter a rigorous critique that challenges this paradigm’s foundations.
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
The work of Cowan and others are leading the way on questioning the foundations of virology.
‘Catching colds via viruses’ was studied for 44 years by the Common Cold Unit. Remains unproven.
“Novel pathogen” that “leaked” from a lab that spread around the world killing people in 2020. Disproved by the work of Rancourt.
Can they make stuff in labs that can make people sick or dead? Sure.
Can you use that to start a “pandemic” panic, with the media doing the rest. Sure.
But can they make something from genetic matter that “can pandemic.” I am confident the answer is no. It is not biologically plausible. So in that context, the biolab risk is wildly exaggerated for financial and industrial “pandemic preparedness” reasons.
30 July, 2024 – No “Virus” has ever been isolated No “Virus” has ever been isolated. A thread Here is one of 12 experiments in over 90 cultures, all with the same results. There is NO SAMPLE in these cultures and hence NO possibility of “a Virus” yet we see here CPE (Cell death) indicative of the presence of a “virus”.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture! The CDC was FOI’d and had no records.)
In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
In this video, we look at a Freedom of Information Act Request that the CDC provided that they say constitutes “proof” that Covid is a virus, is contagious and that it causes disease.
We go through source by source to show that this is inaccurate. We compare electron microscope images of “Covid” and show there are identical particles known to exist in cells already and researchers pointed this out in 2020.
We review the inappropriate controls used to compare “Covid” testing.
In this video, we continue with the discussion about antibodies, we look at the first acknowledged paper that references the idea of antibodies by Emil Von Behring and Kitashato Shibasaburu in relation to diptheria.
We briefly touch on their relationship to Robert Koch (who proposed Koch’s postulates). We then look at multiple failures of the diptheria vaccine that supposedly is conveying said antibodies to people. We then look at that fact that other entities, including vitamin C have been shown to neutralize diptheria.
So, if we haven’t isolated an antibody, and we know other things can neutralize diptheria, how can we come to conclusion that antibodies necessarily convey immunity?
In this video, we continue looking at the evidence for Antibodies going back to the time of Paul Ehrlich and explore the evidence of the “Side Chain” theory.
We briefly discuss the evidence of the effect of Vitamin C on both diptheria and tetanus to demonstrate that neutralization is not exclusive to the antibody idea.
We look at Ehrlich’s presentation to the Royal Society and some of his research works on “side chain” theory and find much of his experimental evidence is lacking.
In this video, we continue to look the supposed benefits anti bodies or the class of particles called Gamma Globulins that they supposedly constitute.
We will see that it appears there are some useful clinical applications for their use at times but we covered side effects, including potentially fatal ones, in the previous lecture.
We will touch on potential environmental exposures that could be causing symptoms expressed in agammaglobunemia which would been use of gamma globulins is indicated. We will cover electrophoresis as an isolating agent and how fragile a process this can be.
In this video, we finally discuss the origin of the supposedly “unique:” anti-bodies suchas IgG, IgM, and IgE etc., how ultracentrifugation is used to identify differences in anti bodies.
Yet we keep finding new sources of potential error but no reproducibility studies of old literature?
We see more examples of both antibodies and white blood cell counts not being sufficient to explain immunity. And finally we look at the side effect profile of administering these immunoglobulins.
This lecture is the culmination of several other lectures so reviewing the lectures on CPE, cDNA and the previous Renin, Hypertensin, and angiotensin lectures will be necessary to understand it.
We deconstruct the idea that ACE 2 is a membrane bound receptor. We will see that they did not do appropriate experiments to determine that Sars Cov 1 attached to ACE 2 and the problem compounds with Covid 19. We will see that despite multiple recommendations since 2020 to use ACE 2 blocker when we actually implement the practice there is no noticeable difference in “Covid” outcomes.
So, how can we say ACE 2 is the entry point for the virus into cells if in the real world when we use medications to block the receptor it does impact the disease at all?
In this video, we finally cover staining procedures for viewing images of virus in electron microscopes.
We review the work of Harold Hillman and his disputing of current views on electron microscope and the nature of artifacts in the slides.
We cover the staining process used on “Covid 19” that requires uranyl acetate and lead citrate, both of which have confirmed toxicity to kidney tissues which is what Covid virus images are tested against.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax: This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey
Because “they” (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearlydon’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
The mothers of 10-year-old Isabella Zuggi and 14-year-old Sydney Figueroa filed wrongful death lawsuits against Merck, alleging the company knowingly failed to warn the public and medical providers about the risk of injury or death from its Gardasil human papillomavirus vaccine.
In part 1 and part 2 of this series, we discussed the HPV vaccine and its links to ovarian insufficiency and autoimmune disease. In part 3, we turn to questions regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, and the limitations of relevant clinical trials to detect such a type of effect.
In this HPV vaccine series, Parts I and II explain how the vaccine works and the evidence suggesting there may be legitimate safety concerns. The remaining parts present questions about real-world vaccine effectiveness and identify specific ingredients which may pose harm.
Vaccination is unjustified if the vaccine carries any substantial risk, as healthy teenagers face little to no risk of dying from cervical cancer. Risk-benefit analyses must be conducted to ascertain the overall balance of benefits and harms on both individual and societal levels.
As of April 16, 2023 VAERS Reported 73,366 Adverse Event Reports 10,949 Serious Reports (about 15%)555 DeathsOnly 1% of all Adverse Events get Reported
* * * * * *
Documentaries and Videos:
“Not a Coincidence”
The CDC and FDA routinely dismiss serious injuries and deaths as “coincidences” without investigation. The young persons in this short video attest that their injuries and deaths are not a coincidence and they plead for Congressional hearings about Gardasil.
Listed here are four well researched and well presented books regarding the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix:
1. The HPV Vaccine on Trial – Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed
Mary Holland , J.D., Kim Mack Rosenberg, J.D.,Eileen IorioAn Important, comprehensive and well-documented book with a preface by Nobel Prize winner, DR. LUC MONTAGNIER: “This book reveals the tragedy of the HPV vaccine scandal.”
2. Shattered Dreams – The HPV Vaccine Exposed
Christina England Documented stories of injury and death and chapters by 13 professionals including Chris Exley, PhD.D
3. Journeys from Trust to Tragedy
Norma Erickson
Dedicated to the stories of some of those who suffered HPV vaccine injuries or death
4. From Pap Smear to HPV Vaccine: The Cervical Cancer Prevention Industry
Sin Hang Lee, MD Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Milford, CT, US
This in-depth book by world renown HPV expert Dr. Sin Hang Lee provides a comprehensive analysis of how the HPV industry has invaded and eroded the women’s health care system in the field of cervical cancer prevention.
* * * * * *
Research Papers and Letters (also see the page “Links to Research on Gardasil” with 90+ studies) :
Dong Y. Undeniable Death Cases After HPV Vaccination. The HPV Vaccine: A Double-Edged Sword? (Part 1). June 25,2023. Accessed 7/27/2023 at:
Tomljenovic L, Tarsell E, Garrett J, Shaw CA, Holland MS.Significant Under-reporting of Quadravalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine-Associated Serious Adverse Events in the United States:Time for Change? Science, Public Health Policy and the Law .Volume 2:37–58 May, 2021 Clinical and Translational Research.
Researchers found that the CDC has been failing to acknowledge and record as serious reports of citizens who suffered “persistent or significant disability/incapacity” following vaccination even though that is one of the criterion defining a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Code of Federal Regulations. Many youth suffered “persistent or significant disability/incapacity” following HPV vaccination. The study explores in detail the effect the failure to use the correct criteria had on detecting safety problems for Merck’s HPV vaccine, Gardasil.
Brawer AE and Sullivan, DH. The expanding cocktail of harmful ingredients in human papillomavirus vaccines. Open Access Text.DOI: 10.15761/FWH.1000195
The study documents the presence in HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Gardasil 9, of an undisclosed, highly toxic chemical called PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl floride). PMSF, also known as Toluene, is a serine protease/acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Toluene is a nerve agent which can inactivate central nervous system functions. When the enzyme acetylcholinesterase is blocked, there could be uncontrollable firing of motorsignals which can manifest as seizures or other biochemical or physiological disorders.
PMSF has been used as a nerve agent in biological warfare! PMSF is used in the manufacturing of the HPV vaccine, but is not supposed to be in the final product. This paper documents that PMSF is in the final product and could initiate the onset of a host of serious adverse events that have been reported following HPV inoculations. Such outcomes include cardiovascular events, motor neuron disorders, autoimmune disorders, cognitive and mood disorders, neurological disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, miscarriages, menstrual disorders, seizures, headaches, extreme fatigue, skin disorders, sleep disorders, paralysis, encephalitis and even sudden death. A link to the paper is here:
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) was asked to investigate the HPV vaccines due to the high number of consumers who reported serious adverse events. The EMA’s cursory investigation was highly criticized in an open letter by the Nordic Cochrane group. The researchers and doctors who signed the letter complained that the EMA’s investigation was “definitely not designed to uncover any real problems that may exist with HPV vaccines. The arbitrary and most likely pre-ordained conclusion must not go unchallenged”.
Open letter to the EMA from the Nordic Cochrane group with scathing criticism of the EMA’s superficial investigation of the hpv vaccine.
Tomljenovic L, Shaw C. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds? Annals of Medicine, Dec. 2011.
The authors conclude that the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated….
Serious adverse reactions including deaths, convulsions, paralysis, GBS, autoimmune disorders, chronic fatigue, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, anaphylaxis and cervical cancer remain to be fully evaluated.
The long-term health of many women may be at risk against still unknown vaccine benefits.
Tomljenovic L, Shaw C. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination : Causal or Coincidental?
Researchers found evidence ofcerebral blood vessel wall immunoreactivity with HPV-16L1 which appears to have triggered fatal vasculopathy in two cases of sudden unexplained death following Gardasil vaccination. They conclude that HPV vaccines containing HPV-16L1 antigens pose an inherent risk for triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies. The full report is published at
January 14, 2016 Dr. Sin Hang Lee sent an open letter of complaint to the Director General of the World Health
Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan, charging members of GACVS, the CDC, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and others with manipulation of data and suppression of science in order to maintain the illusion of HPV vaccine safety in the face of valid contradictory evidence:
independent laboratory under the direction of HPV expert, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, analyzed thirteen different lots of Gardasil collected worldwide. All vials were found to be contaminated with HPV DNA. This is significant because residual DNA in a vaccine can trigger autoimmune disease, anaphylactic shock or tumors. Merck and the FDA heretofore had denied that there was any HPV DNA in Gardasil. Dr. Lee’s research paper regarding these findings and the implications is published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry:
To assess if there might be patterns to reported adverse events following Gardasil vaccinations, the authors worked with the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) to develop a questionnaire to document symptoms. Families voluntarily completed the questionnaire which was analyzed by the authors and resulted in this report:
While the respondents represent a small sample and the responses have all of the limitations of self-reports, the findings are nevertheless compelling. The data clearly demonstrate consistency in the types and frequency of symptoms experienced following injections of Gardasil that did not exist prior to injection. The symptoms increase in occurrence, number and severity with additional exposure to Gardasil. The graphs and charts reflect a dose-response and temporal relationship. For the 6 deaths reported, there is statistically detectable evidence that the hypothesis that Gardasil is not related to any of them is not tenable. One practical consequence of these findings is that if one experiences certain post-injection symptoms, it may strongly indicate that the inoculation protocol should be aborted.
An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of COVID ‘vaccines’. Where is the evidence for this? How sound is it? Where is the risk benefit analysis? How many lives saved compared to how many excess deaths caused or at least strongly associated with the COVID injections worldwide?
Findings: Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7-15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1-20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination.
According to a study published Thursday. June 23, 2022 in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year, but even more deaths could have been prevented if global targets had been reached. (Pfizer via AP)
A bright red flag is here:
“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”
There are clear conflicts of interest in the funding from bodies directly invested in the vaccine industry such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.
Imperial College London are the original modellers that grossly over-estimated the expected GOVID deaths leading to policies and practices based on unrealistic fear. They predicted over half a million deaths in the UK and over 2 million deaths in the US. They had a vested interest in balancing the books with a model that produced an outcome with strikingly similar number of ‘lives saved’.
WHO (World Health Organisation) are funded heavily by the Gates Foundation. They are at present lobbying to have global oversight over all future pandemics. Changes to the IHR (International Health Regulations, if successful will give them unprecedented powers including mandating vaccination in all member countries.
Arecent preprint, with the now questionable Medical Journal Lancet, makes the claim that the Covid vaccine introduction in December 2020 actually prevented tens of millions of deaths worldwide.
This paper was submitted by the research group headed by Azra Ghani from the Imperial College of London. Dr. Ghani acts as a consultant for HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline, and the WHO and as with her other Imperial College colleagues, has been pro-lockdown/pro-panic, and pro-vaccine for more than two years.
A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:
“C. Population Susceptibility
The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”
“The mathematical models that have been presented from Imperial College have always been wildly WRONG.”
In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.
In defence of the unprecedented numbers of reported deaths and serious adverse effects following the Covid injections, the pro-vax “health experts” always retreat to the mythical “20 million lives saved” claim without providing any evidence.
CLICK HERE to view a paper by Makeover, T. et al entitled “Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness” which was published in May 2023. I quote from this paper:
“By comparing graphs of the intensity of vaccination and the rate of mortality, we see periods of intense vaccination are followed by periods of higher excess mortality. Basic statistical data confirm that COVID-19 vaccines increased the mortality rate” and “it has confirmed that the vaccinated part of the global population has an increased mortality rate of about 14.5% with respect to the non-vaccinated population cohort”.
and here are the numbers from the paper:
Infection fatality ratio (IFR):
The proportion of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 who die from COVID-19.
20 million lives saved? Here are quite recent pre-vaccination IFR data on Covid-19 in the young and working-age population:
“The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”
“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0–59 and 0–69 year old people, respectively.”
‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’
Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.
1 January 2023
Fig. 2. Box plot of infection fatality rate (IFR) estimates across countries per each specified age bin.
Three weeks after the McCullough Foundation released its Landmark Autism Report—a comprehensive 300-study analysis detailing decades of overlooked and suppressed evidence—the CDC has quietly reversed its 30-year public position on vaccines and autism.
In a stunning update to its own website, the agency now concedes that the long-repeated claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not evidence-based, and further acknowledges that studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities. For the first time, a major U.S. public health institution is admitting that its categorical denials were not grounded in scientific certainty.
In this livestream, Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, and Dr. Peter A. McCullough will break down exactly what the CDC changed, why the reversal happened now, and how the McCullough Foundation’s Landmark Autism Report forced global scrutiny of long-ignored data. Together, they will analyze the scientific evidence the CDC can no longer dismiss, the collapse of the “settled science” narrative, and the implications for families, medical ethics, public policy, and institutional accountability. This is a historic turning point, and the truth — backed by evidence — is finally breaking through.
I have met a fair share of people with identical experiences to the parents in this audience. I suspect that in the near future we will see the same for those with COVID-19 injuries, and like before, almost everyone will deny they exist.
Former CDC Director Tom Frieden made an unusual post on X.
His post included these two images:
We’ve seen these studies before. But now, from Frieden others have cited a small subset of studies—a tightly curated list of 14 papers—as definitive prof that vaccines do not cause autism.
First problem: They left out of bunch of studies, and failed to report that not all vaccines have been tested for association with autism, and failed to report that association analyses are not critical tests of causality in the first place.
(My “Magic” slide from Life University, GA where the audience first learned that not all vaccines had been tested and that some positive results DID exist that linked vaccines and autism – 2015)
Beneath Frieden’s canned but polished talking points and “official” (e.g., AAP) institutional endorsements of the list of 14 lies a brittle and contradictory foundation. A closer examination reveals that not one of these 14 studies was equipped to test falsify (i.e., test to the point of rejecting it if it was false) the causal hypothesis. Each either used the wrong design, wrong comparison groups, or wrong statistical assumptions. What follows is a forensic critique of all 14 studies as presented in two pro-vaccine infographics presented by Frieden.
In addition to these substantial voices below stating that vaccines cause autism, the Institute of Medicine claimed in 2004 that vaccines are a plausible cause of autism and anyone who understands study design will know that there has never been a properly designed study that has debunked this fact. Vaccines are the main environmental factor that ALL children have been exposed to for three decades, and any study that has examined the cause of autism and NOT included the vaccination schedule in the investigation, is flawed before the study was even started. When I asked health officials why they were not including vaccines in these studies, they looked me in the eye and said “it would be unethical to deny a child a vaccine!”. Yet apparently it is not unethical to add unlimited drugs called “vaccines” to an infants body without testing them for safety or efficacy. That parents, is the stupidity of the so called “evidence-based medicine” that your government is using and these officials know they have been lying to you for decades.
Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is now estimated to affect more than 1 in 31 children in the United States, with prevalence rising sharply over the past two decades and posing an increasing burden to families and public health systems. Most of the literature on ASD characterizes it as a complex neurodevelopmental condition shaped by multiple determinants, including genetic liability, immune dysregulation, perinatal stressors, and environmental toxicants. Since 1996, the possible role of childhood vaccination has also been discussed and debated. This review synthesizes the full range of evidence to clarify both vaccine-related and non-vaccine contributors to ASD risk.
Conclusion: The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state. Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination constitutes the most significant modifiable risk factor for ASD, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule. As ASD prevalence continues to rise at an unprecedented pace, clarifying the risks associated with cumulative vaccine dosing and timing remains an urgent public health priority.
For over a century, vaccination has been repeatedly linked to severe neurological injuries including brain damage — with many modern studies showing a 3 to 7 fold increase in common chronic illnesses
To dodge this massive liability, all research into vaccine injuries (and many other catastrophes like Agent Orange) was suppressed so that health authorities could claim there was “no evidence” of vaccine harm
Another scheme was to redefine the brain injury as “autism” rather than encephalitis (which the U.S. government was legally required to provide injury compensation for)
Previously, children with significant vaccine brain damage were referred to as “mentally retarded.” However, after a multi-decade campaign cancelled “retarded” they were instead diagnosed as autistic — a vague term which blurs severe and minor disability together, thereby effectively concealing the severe cases from the public’s awareness
This article will reveal the manipulative techniques and wordplay that have been used to conceal vaccine injuries from the public’s awareness, as now is the time when we can at last end this atrocity
n my first “Mapping” article I covered about 850 studies and showed the six that stand out as the best — Gallagher and Goodman (2008 & 2010), Mawson et al. (2017A & 2017B), Hooker and Miller (2021), and Mawson and Jacob (2025).
In this article, I’ve covered several thousand more sources including hundreds of studies and a wealth of alternative data sources that provide a comprehensive picture of the autism epidemic in the United States. Together these two articles provide the most comprehensive map of the autism epidemic ever created. Previously I’ve made the case that medical decisions should be made based on the totality of evidence — well, this is the totality of the autism evidence as it stands right now.
Anexplosive peer-reviewed studyreveals a chilling reality: the childhood vaccine schedule is directly tied to the majority of autism cases among Medicaid-enrolled children.
This isn’t speculation, it’s data. The findings show that routine vaccinations account for most autism diagnoses in the study group.
This is a devastating crime against our children.
No one has been punished for it, and don’t expect that to change anytime soon.
Scientists have found that in children with autism: • Inflammatory chemicals like IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 are elevated • Their brains are often enlarged—a sign of swelling • Their blood-brain barrier and gut barrier are leaky • And aluminum—a known neurotoxin—is often found at sky-high levels inside their brains. • One study even found aluminum levels in autistic brain tissue that were higher than almost any human brain tissue ever recorded.
“The science is settled” is a phrase invoked not to convey certainty but to halt inquiry. This rhetorical flourish has been used repeatedly in public health communications, particularly regarding the long-standing controversy over a potential link between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). A recent example of this can be found in the March 19, 2025 article from Johns Hopkins Public Health, titled“Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. Why Do Some People Think They Do?”
The purpose of this rebuttal is not to assert that vaccines do cause autism in all cases, but to make the case—based on published literature and verifiable findings—that the issue remains scientifically unresolved, and prematurely declaring it “settled” is a disservice to science, to public trust, and to families seeking answers, and that the Johns Hopkins article blissfully ignores peer-reviewed studies worth considering that show their conclusion is recklessly irresponsible.
Science is a process—a dynamic, self-correcting, and transparent one. It requires that inconvenient evidence be explored, not erased. It requires that questions be welcomed, not stigmatized. And it demands, above all, that institutions committed to public health also commit to intellectual honesty.
The vaccine-autism connection has not been disproven. It has been politically and institutionally suppressed.
For the sake of public trust, scientific integrity, and the countless families still seeking answers, it is time to open the conversation—not close it.
An honest AI Chatbot read thelatest Mawson study, and concluded that the CDC should warn parents that it’s more likely than not that vaccines cause autism.
Vaccinations required for school attendance have increased nearly threefold since the 1950s, now targeting 17 infectious diseases. However, the impact of the expanded schedule on children’s overall health remains uncertain. Preliminary studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children have reported that the vaccinated are significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to be diagnosed with bacterial infections, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).
Vaccines and autism:
There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism …except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism:
Dr Wakefield’s special interest was inflammatory bowel disease and this paper reported a case series of 12 children with developmental disorders whose mothers also described a constellation of bowel symptoms appearing shortly after their child’s vaccination.
Wakefield’s co-authors included specialist physicians in psychiatry, histopathology, radiology and gastroenterology. After carefully documenting their research findings in the paper, the investigators cautiously concluded: “We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and it’s possible relation to this vaccine.”
Factcheck.org is, once again, fact-checked by Dr. Lyons-Weiler and their opinion-based claims are debunked. Problem #1 The first problem is that there ARE studies that have found links between vaccines and autism. Here’s a figure of the CDC schedule in 2015. Problem #2 The second problem is two-fold: the studies that are alleged to have reported no association suffered miserably from low statistical power, they tested the wrong hypothesis..
1. Contrary to popular belief, there is actually a great deal of compelling evidence linking vaccines to autism. For example, regressive autism always develops shortly after vaccination—but never before, something that cannot happen unless one causes the other. Likewise, there is a significant amount of evidence correlating vaccine uptake with autism rates.
2. There is presently no accepted explanation for what is causing the explosion of autism we are facing.
3. The explosion of autism is one of the costliest diseases facing our country, so decades of hand waiving that has insisted there’s no scientifically valid explanation for this explosion doesn’t cut it.
If we want to see if the MMR vaccine causes autism, the best and simplest way to do that is simply to plot every autism case relative to the closest MMR vaccination date of that child. The date is the date when the parent or expert observer first noticed telltale ASD behaviors (andnot when a clinical diagnosis is made which could be years later).
” We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine.”
Writes Oz’s Substack
Aug 10: