Worth the watch – 13:19 Commentary:
💯👇😬 🚨 They Live was never just a movie… it was a WARNING! John Carpenter’s 1988 cult classic predicted the year 2025 as the moment..
Stardust says they have created a powder that they promise “wouldn’t accumulate in humans or ecosystems, and can’t harm the ozone layer or create acid rain like the sulfur-rich particles from volcanoes.”
But it refuses to disclose what the particles are actually made of, rendering those promises meaningless without transparency, independent verification, or the public’s informed consent.
Substack Israeli-U.S. Geoengineering Company ‘Stardust’ to Begin Blocking the Sun with Airborne Chemicals ‘As Soon as April’ Company will not disclose what the aerosol is made of, raising informed consent worries.
The good news – according to theWHO– is that all these efforts have been successful so far, and they are actually vaccinating more children than they planned too.
…And the world breathed a sign of relief.
Thankfully the starving, homeless children of Gaza won’t get polio as they crouch under the rubble of their homes praying the next batch of cluster bombs misses them.
Israel and Hamas have agreed to a “series of pauses” in ‘fighting’ to allow children to be vaccinated against polio, with WHO successfully rolling out the first 640,000 shots.
How is a vaccine programme allowed to take place during a ‘deadly war’?
Not even ‘war’ can stop Big Pharma.
Equally as important, we must question the true intentions as to why a polio vaccine campaign is underway in Gaza, given the troubled history of the product itself – both in the past and the modern day.
A group of climate alarm devotee ‘scientists’ are lobbying signatories to an Eisenhower-era Antarctic Treaty to fork over $50 billion so they can construct a 62-mile “curtain” to protect the world from what they’re calling a “doomsday glacier.”The glacier in question is known as Thwaites Glacier, a Great Britain-sized hunk of ice located in western Antarctica. It has been nicknamed the “Doomsday Glacier” by climate zealots because it can be subject to warmer ocean currents. Climate alarmists claim that climate change, brought on by human emissions of greenhouse gases, is responsible for disrupting what they call “traditional ice thickening and thinning cycles” of the glacier.
Regular readers will know that I have long been concerned over the extraordinary level of payments to wind farms to switch off.
These so-called ‘constraint payments’ are deemed necessary when the wires in the transmission grid have inadequate capacity to get a generator’s power to market. [emphasis, links added]
The scientists are injecting reflective particles into the sky, dumping chemicals in the ocean, and spraying saltwater in the air in a desperate effort to stop or reverse “climate change.”
They claim techniques are necessary to cool the planet because global efforts to check greenhouse gas emissions are failing.
These geoengineering approaches were once considered taboo by scientists and regulators who feared that tinkering with the environment could have unintended consequences.
However, researchers are receiving taxpayer funds and private investments to advance Gates’s plans.
Geoengineering has become mainstream in recent years, and on the outskirts of these scientific discussions, you will now find some pretty wild and hilarious weather manipulation ideas.
In “The Wizard of Oz”, at one point Dorothy tells her dog that she has “a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore”. She had been dropped in a strange new world that was crazier than anything she had ever imagined. Needless to say, many of us feel the exact same way. We’re not in the America that we grew up in anymore. Instead, we now live in a country that appears to be a cross between a really bad science fiction movie and a freak show. Sadly, the pace of change has now reached an exponential rate, and things will get even more insane during the years that are ahead of us.
‘When do we stop pretending that men can simply become women and women can be men?
How much longer can we let this mass mania go on?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, last seen making toddlers mask for a virus that barely affected them — using masks that didn’t prevent exposure — now has suggestions fortrans men and women who want to breastfeed.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax:
In 2020, we started investigating thevirus modeland came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-calledTobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properlycontrolled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement.
The narratives stemming from virology’s pseudoscience are now used to control populations in every possible way by keeping them in a state of fear. The phantom “viruses” and the invented “countermeasures” also enable vast transfers of wealth from the public to governments and their favoured friends, while allowingreal and sickening globalist agendasto roll on. It is therefore more important than ever to help more people see beyond the virus model, both for their own health and the future of humanity. While for some individuals this requires a scientific treatise such as Mark’sA Farewell to Virology, for many others they simply want to know, “if it’s not a virus, what’s making me sick then?” In this video, I answer that question with my top 40 reasons…
In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of theAlliance for Human Research Protectionsent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary“Never Again is Now Global”.
The task for our chapter was to “unmask the viral paradigm” and bidA Farewell to Virologyin non-technical language, while still citing scientific reports.
Our essay provides the overview of how the “pandemic” was staged and in some ways is a summary of part of our latest book,The Final Pandemic.
Jerm and Dr Tom Cowan discuss the COVID pandemic, questioning virus myths and medical authority. They highlight flawed virus isolation, unreliable PCR testing, and the body’s natural healing. They explore detoxification, challenge contagion theories, and debunk myths about bacteria, rabies, and the immune system. They stress the need for a scientifically literate society to build a healthier culture.
In this episode, Alec explores the misconceptions surrounding infectious diseases and reframes how we understand sickness. He examines the role of belief in health, gaps in virus research, and alternative reasons for individual and group illness. Discover insights into biofield interactions, the intelligence of water as it relates to our body, and how shifting your perspective can unlock new paths to wellness.
What if viruses don’t exist at all? – In this explosive interview, Dr. Tom Cowan — longtime physician and author of The Contagion Myth — makes the shocking case that everything we know about viruses and germ theory is wrong. – He says illness comes from toxins, not contagion — and mainstream science doesn’t want you to hear it. – Watch now and decide for yourself: medical truth-teller or dangerous heretic?
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 @KimIversenShow I spoke with Dr Tom Cowan who challenges the idea that viruses even exist. What he says may be controversial, but it will definitely get you thinking👇 https://x.com/KimIversenShow/status/1907086569544036726
This video, presented by Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., provides an in-depth analysis of the standard “Virus”-theory in the context of German New Medicine (GNM). More information is available athttps://learninggnm.com.
The findings of this investigation align with what is seen in the published literature. Find all of the official documents (FOIs) and emails with virologists here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
In this dynamic interview, Christine Massey shares her groundbreaking research into the issue of whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, as well as the broader question as to whether any “virus” has been proven to exist.
Christine Massey has a master’s degree in bio-statistics and has worked in cancer research.
The controversy over whether the COVID “virus” has been proven to exist, is confusing to most people, but Ms. Massey pursued a route that was purely objective in doing this research. She submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to 213 medical institutions in 40 different countries asking them for documents that proved that the COVID virus has been purified and proven to exist. The responses she received from these institutions were absolutely shocking and draws into question everything they have been telling the public!
Another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature
My order was for:
All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. – that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged “avian influenza virus” (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in “host” cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or
2. – that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be “avian influenza virus” directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called “hosts”, with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or
3. – wherein the purported “genome” of any alleged “avian influenza virus” was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a “host” (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or
4. – that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported “avian influenza viruses”. My July 21, 2024FOIA orderfiled with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.
No one has valid scientific evidence to show that “avian influenza virus” H5N1 (or any other alleged “virus”) even exists. I challenge anyone to prove me wrong by citing such evidence.
Resources for farmers
For anyone approached by government agents who want to test for (imagined) viruses in their livestock, the Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) created anAction Alert formthat can be given to the agents before allowing them entry to the land. The form requires the agent(s) to identify themselves and to cite valid scientific evidence of the alleged virus in question, as well as contagion of the relevant illness and validation of the tests.
– As we delve into Alec Zeck’s 2.5-hour presentation, Reframing the Infectious Disease Paradigm* , we encounter a rigorous critique that challenges this paradigm’s foundations.
The measles virus began as an imagined construct to explain why people get sick. A particle was not observed first and subsequently a virus theory was developed.
As described by a1924 article, researchers were unable to consistently observe any microbe in the bodily fluids of people with measles. Despite this, they presupposed that a minute pathogen existed that could explain sickness—what came thereafter arose to fulfil the presuppositional premise.
The work of Cowan and others are leading the way on questioning the foundations of virology.
‘Catching colds via viruses’ was studied for 44 years by the Common Cold Unit. Remains unproven.
“Novel pathogen” that “leaked” from a lab that spread around the world killing people in 2020. Disproved by the work of Rancourt.
Can they make stuff in labs that can make people sick or dead? Sure.
Can you use that to start a “pandemic” panic, with the media doing the rest. Sure.
But can they make something from genetic matter that “can pandemic.” I am confident the answer is no. It is not biologically plausible. So in that context, the biolab risk is wildly exaggerated for financial and industrial “pandemic preparedness” reasons.
30 July, 2024 – No “Virus” has ever been isolated No “Virus” has ever been isolated. A thread Here is one of 12 experiments in over 90 cultures, all with the same results. There is NO SAMPLE in these cultures and hence NO possibility of “a Virus” yet we see here CPE (Cell death) indicative of the presence of a “virus”.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture! The CDC was FOI’d and had no records.)
In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
In this video, we look at a Freedom of Information Act Request that the CDC provided that they say constitutes “proof” that Covid is a virus, is contagious and that it causes disease.
We go through source by source to show that this is inaccurate. We compare electron microscope images of “Covid” and show there are identical particles known to exist in cells already and researchers pointed this out in 2020.
We review the inappropriate controls used to compare “Covid” testing.
In this video, we continue with the discussion about antibodies, we look at the first acknowledged paper that references the idea of antibodies by Emil Von Behring and Kitashato Shibasaburu in relation to diptheria.
We briefly touch on their relationship to Robert Koch (who proposed Koch’s postulates). We then look at multiple failures of the diptheria vaccine that supposedly is conveying said antibodies to people. We then look at that fact that other entities, including vitamin C have been shown to neutralize diptheria.
So, if we haven’t isolated an antibody, and we know other things can neutralize diptheria, how can we come to conclusion that antibodies necessarily convey immunity?
In this video, we continue looking at the evidence for Antibodies going back to the time of Paul Ehrlich and explore the evidence of the “Side Chain” theory.
We briefly discuss the evidence of the effect of Vitamin C on both diptheria and tetanus to demonstrate that neutralization is not exclusive to the antibody idea.
We look at Ehrlich’s presentation to the Royal Society and some of his research works on “side chain” theory and find much of his experimental evidence is lacking.
In this video, we continue to look the supposed benefits anti bodies or the class of particles called Gamma Globulins that they supposedly constitute.
We will see that it appears there are some useful clinical applications for their use at times but we covered side effects, including potentially fatal ones, in the previous lecture.
We will touch on potential environmental exposures that could be causing symptoms expressed in agammaglobunemia which would been use of gamma globulins is indicated. We will cover electrophoresis as an isolating agent and how fragile a process this can be.
In this video, we finally discuss the origin of the supposedly “unique:” anti-bodies suchas IgG, IgM, and IgE etc., how ultracentrifugation is used to identify differences in anti bodies.
Yet we keep finding new sources of potential error but no reproducibility studies of old literature?
We see more examples of both antibodies and white blood cell counts not being sufficient to explain immunity. And finally we look at the side effect profile of administering these immunoglobulins.
This lecture is the culmination of several other lectures so reviewing the lectures on CPE, cDNA and the previous Renin, Hypertensin, and angiotensin lectures will be necessary to understand it.
We deconstruct the idea that ACE 2 is a membrane bound receptor. We will see that they did not do appropriate experiments to determine that Sars Cov 1 attached to ACE 2 and the problem compounds with Covid 19. We will see that despite multiple recommendations since 2020 to use ACE 2 blocker when we actually implement the practice there is no noticeable difference in “Covid” outcomes.
So, how can we say ACE 2 is the entry point for the virus into cells if in the real world when we use medications to block the receptor it does impact the disease at all?
In this video, we finally cover staining procedures for viewing images of virus in electron microscopes.
We review the work of Harold Hillman and his disputing of current views on electron microscope and the nature of artifacts in the slides.
We cover the staining process used on “Covid 19” that requires uranyl acetate and lead citrate, both of which have confirmed toxicity to kidney tissues which is what Covid virus images are tested against.
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax: This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey
Because “they” (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearlydon’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
The mothers of 10-year-old Isabella Zuggi and 14-year-old Sydney Figueroa filed wrongful death lawsuits against Merck, alleging the company knowingly failed to warn the public and medical providers about the risk of injury or death from its Gardasil human papillomavirus vaccine.
In part 1 and part 2 of this series, we discussed the HPV vaccine and its links to ovarian insufficiency and autoimmune disease. In part 3, we turn to questions regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, and the limitations of relevant clinical trials to detect such a type of effect.
In this HPV vaccine series, Parts I and II explain how the vaccine works and the evidence suggesting there may be legitimate safety concerns. The remaining parts present questions about real-world vaccine effectiveness and identify specific ingredients which may pose harm.
Vaccination is unjustified if the vaccine carries any substantial risk, as healthy teenagers face little to no risk of dying from cervical cancer. Risk-benefit analyses must be conducted to ascertain the overall balance of benefits and harms on both individual and societal levels.
As of April 16, 2023 VAERS Reported 73,366 Adverse Event Reports 10,949 Serious Reports (about 15%)555 DeathsOnly 1% of all Adverse Events get Reported
* * * * * *
Documentaries and Videos:
“Not a Coincidence”
The CDC and FDA routinely dismiss serious injuries and deaths as “coincidences” without investigation. The young persons in this short video attest that their injuries and deaths are not a coincidence and they plead for Congressional hearings about Gardasil.
Listed here are four well researched and well presented books regarding the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix:
1. The HPV Vaccine on Trial – Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed
Mary Holland , J.D., Kim Mack Rosenberg, J.D.,Eileen IorioAn Important, comprehensive and well-documented book with a preface by Nobel Prize winner, DR. LUC MONTAGNIER: “This book reveals the tragedy of the HPV vaccine scandal.”
2. Shattered Dreams – The HPV Vaccine Exposed
Christina England Documented stories of injury and death and chapters by 13 professionals including Chris Exley, PhD.D
3. Journeys from Trust to Tragedy
Norma Erickson
Dedicated to the stories of some of those who suffered HPV vaccine injuries or death
4. From Pap Smear to HPV Vaccine: The Cervical Cancer Prevention Industry
Sin Hang Lee, MD Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Milford, CT, US
This in-depth book by world renown HPV expert Dr. Sin Hang Lee provides a comprehensive analysis of how the HPV industry has invaded and eroded the women’s health care system in the field of cervical cancer prevention.
* * * * * *
Research Papers and Letters (also see the page “Links to Research on Gardasil” with 90+ studies) :
Dong Y. Undeniable Death Cases After HPV Vaccination. The HPV Vaccine: A Double-Edged Sword? (Part 1). June 25,2023. Accessed 7/27/2023 at:
Tomljenovic L, Tarsell E, Garrett J, Shaw CA, Holland MS.Significant Under-reporting of Quadravalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine-Associated Serious Adverse Events in the United States:Time for Change? Science, Public Health Policy and the Law .Volume 2:37–58 May, 2021 Clinical and Translational Research.
Researchers found that the CDC has been failing to acknowledge and record as serious reports of citizens who suffered “persistent or significant disability/incapacity” following vaccination even though that is one of the criterion defining a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Code of Federal Regulations. Many youth suffered “persistent or significant disability/incapacity” following HPV vaccination. The study explores in detail the effect the failure to use the correct criteria had on detecting safety problems for Merck’s HPV vaccine, Gardasil.
Brawer AE and Sullivan, DH. The expanding cocktail of harmful ingredients in human papillomavirus vaccines. Open Access Text.DOI: 10.15761/FWH.1000195
The study documents the presence in HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Gardasil 9, of an undisclosed, highly toxic chemical called PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl floride). PMSF, also known as Toluene, is a serine protease/acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Toluene is a nerve agent which can inactivate central nervous system functions. When the enzyme acetylcholinesterase is blocked, there could be uncontrollable firing of motorsignals which can manifest as seizures or other biochemical or physiological disorders.
PMSF has been used as a nerve agent in biological warfare! PMSF is used in the manufacturing of the HPV vaccine, but is not supposed to be in the final product. This paper documents that PMSF is in the final product and could initiate the onset of a host of serious adverse events that have been reported following HPV inoculations. Such outcomes include cardiovascular events, motor neuron disorders, autoimmune disorders, cognitive and mood disorders, neurological disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, miscarriages, menstrual disorders, seizures, headaches, extreme fatigue, skin disorders, sleep disorders, paralysis, encephalitis and even sudden death. A link to the paper is here:
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) was asked to investigate the HPV vaccines due to the high number of consumers who reported serious adverse events. The EMA’s cursory investigation was highly criticized in an open letter by the Nordic Cochrane group. The researchers and doctors who signed the letter complained that the EMA’s investigation was “definitely not designed to uncover any real problems that may exist with HPV vaccines. The arbitrary and most likely pre-ordained conclusion must not go unchallenged”.
Open letter to the EMA from the Nordic Cochrane group with scathing criticism of the EMA’s superficial investigation of the hpv vaccine.
Tomljenovic L, Shaw C. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds? Annals of Medicine, Dec. 2011.
The authors conclude that the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated….
Serious adverse reactions including deaths, convulsions, paralysis, GBS, autoimmune disorders, chronic fatigue, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, anaphylaxis and cervical cancer remain to be fully evaluated.
The long-term health of many women may be at risk against still unknown vaccine benefits.
Tomljenovic L, Shaw C. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination : Causal or Coincidental?
Researchers found evidence ofcerebral blood vessel wall immunoreactivity with HPV-16L1 which appears to have triggered fatal vasculopathy in two cases of sudden unexplained death following Gardasil vaccination. They conclude that HPV vaccines containing HPV-16L1 antigens pose an inherent risk for triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies. The full report is published at
January 14, 2016 Dr. Sin Hang Lee sent an open letter of complaint to the Director General of the World Health
Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan, charging members of GACVS, the CDC, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and others with manipulation of data and suppression of science in order to maintain the illusion of HPV vaccine safety in the face of valid contradictory evidence:
independent laboratory under the direction of HPV expert, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, analyzed thirteen different lots of Gardasil collected worldwide. All vials were found to be contaminated with HPV DNA. This is significant because residual DNA in a vaccine can trigger autoimmune disease, anaphylactic shock or tumors. Merck and the FDA heretofore had denied that there was any HPV DNA in Gardasil. Dr. Lee’s research paper regarding these findings and the implications is published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry:
To assess if there might be patterns to reported adverse events following Gardasil vaccinations, the authors worked with the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) to develop a questionnaire to document symptoms. Families voluntarily completed the questionnaire which was analyzed by the authors and resulted in this report:
While the respondents represent a small sample and the responses have all of the limitations of self-reports, the findings are nevertheless compelling. The data clearly demonstrate consistency in the types and frequency of symptoms experienced following injections of Gardasil that did not exist prior to injection. The symptoms increase in occurrence, number and severity with additional exposure to Gardasil. The graphs and charts reflect a dose-response and temporal relationship. For the 6 deaths reported, there is statistically detectable evidence that the hypothesis that Gardasil is not related to any of them is not tenable. One practical consequence of these findings is that if one experiences certain post-injection symptoms, it may strongly indicate that the inoculation protocol should be aborted.
An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of COVID ‘vaccines’. Where is the evidence for this? How sound is it? Where is the risk benefit analysis? How many lives saved compared to how many excess deaths caused or at least strongly associated with the COVID injections worldwide?
Findings: Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7-15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1-20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination.
According to a study published Thursday. June 23, 2022 in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year, but even more deaths could have been prevented if global targets had been reached. (Pfizer via AP)
A bright red flag is here:
“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”
There are clear conflicts of interest in the funding from bodies directly invested in the vaccine industry such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.
Imperial College London are the original modellers that grossly over-estimated the expected GOVID deaths leading to policies and practices based on unrealistic fear. They predicted over half a million deaths in the UK and over 2 million deaths in the US. They had a vested interest in balancing the books with a model that produced an outcome with strikingly similar number of ‘lives saved’.
WHO (World Health Organisation) are funded heavily by the Gates Foundation. They are at present lobbying to have global oversight over all future pandemics. Changes to the IHR (International Health Regulations, if successful will give them unprecedented powers including mandating vaccination in all member countries.
Arecent preprint, with the now questionable Medical Journal Lancet, makes the claim that the Covid vaccine introduction in December 2020 actually prevented tens of millions of deaths worldwide.
This paper was submitted by the research group headed by Azra Ghani from the Imperial College of London. Dr. Ghani acts as a consultant for HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline, and the WHO and as with her other Imperial College colleagues, has been pro-lockdown/pro-panic, and pro-vaccine for more than two years.
A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:
“C. Population Susceptibility
The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”
“The mathematical models that have been presented from Imperial College have always been wildly WRONG.”
In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.
In defence of the unprecedented numbers of reported deaths and serious adverse effects following the Covid injections, the pro-vax “health experts” always retreat to the mythical “20 million lives saved” claim without providing any evidence.
CLICK HERE to view a paper by Makeover, T. et al entitled “Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness” which was published in May 2023. I quote from this paper:
“By comparing graphs of the intensity of vaccination and the rate of mortality, we see periods of intense vaccination are followed by periods of higher excess mortality. Basic statistical data confirm that COVID-19 vaccines increased the mortality rate” and “it has confirmed that the vaccinated part of the global population has an increased mortality rate of about 14.5% with respect to the non-vaccinated population cohort”.
and here are the numbers from the paper:
Infection fatality ratio (IFR):
The proportion of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 who die from COVID-19.
20 million lives saved? Here are quite recent pre-vaccination IFR data on Covid-19 in the young and working-age population:
“The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”
“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0–59 and 0–69 year old people, respectively.”
‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’
Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.
1 January 2023
Fig. 2. Box plot of infection fatality rate (IFR) estimates across countries per each specified age bin.
Yes, the space mirrors ideas exactly as it sounds — giant mirrors that are supposed to orbit the Earth and “reflect sunlight away” from our ‘warming planet’.
Writes Oz’s Substack
Aug 10: