21 June, 2026 – The Forgotten Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries
From birth, we are taught that vaccines were one of the most remarkable discoveries in history, but…
by A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR – midwesterndoctor.com
Story at a Glance:
-
Neurological injuries from vaccination have been documented since the smallpox vaccine over two centuries ago, with severe injuries reported throughout medical literature.
-
The medical profession concealed these injuries, believing public vaccination benefits justified hiding information that might create vaccine hesitancy.
-
Historical injuries like spreading paralysis mirror current “one in a million” vaccine injuries, but toxicity documentation was erased to preserve the “safe and effective” narrative.
-
In the past, these injuries were widely reported, but now research into them is widely censored.
-
Many of these forgotten reports are critical for understanding modern “inexplicable” conditions like Autism.
The Forgotten Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries.pdf
19 June, 2026 – The Targeted Assassination of Studies Showing Vaccines Cause Injury
Since they can’t win on the merits, they’ve resorted to other tactics
Aaron Siri
A journalist from The Guardian recently contacted me for a comment on vaccine-related studies I have previously cited in my work. The publishers of these studies have decided—years after publication—that these studies were so flawed and “dangerous to public health” that they needed to be retracted or investigated. The journalist wanted to know if I would amend my book and my recent ACIP presentation now that these studies were under attack.
My response:
“I welcome the media noting the targeted assassination of articles that do not fit the religious belief of vaccine proponents; this is also exemplified by the media’s lack of interest in the hundreds of other articles, reviews, and trial documents from my book and ACIP presentation which make plain that the claim vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ is not supported by the available evidence.”
So which studies are under fire? You won’t be surprised that they are on some of the biggest hot-button topics when it comes to vaccine injury:
1. REMOVED: Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature (Neil Miller, 2021). This study has not just been retracted—it has been removed. Completely wiped. This is reserved for only the most egregious publication offenses. Elsevier says it found “serious methodological flaws” and that the paper “may pose potential risks to public health.” Author Neil Miller explains their concerns were “either insignificant or plainly incorrect.” He has shared his emails with Elsevier publicly, so you can be the judge. A copy of the study can still be found here.
2. RETRACTED: Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002 (Carolyn Gallagher & Melody Goodman, 2010). This paper was published sixteen years ago. Sixteen years. And only now was it retracted after the publisher claimed that “due to fundamental methodological flaws the study’s conclusions are unsound.” The authors stand behind the study and noted “many of the recent criticisms of the paper are consistent with what we recognized and noted at the time.”
3. UNDER INVESTIGATION: Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders (Brian Hooker & Neil Miller, 2020). This study now has an “expression of concern” attached to it that says the study is “under investigation.” Miller stated that the investigation has to do with false allegations that the data came from another source and was not disclosed.
4. UNDER INVESTIGATION: Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada (David Speicher, Jessica Rose, & Kevin McKernan, 2025). The publisher may regret kicking the hornet’s nest on this one. Rose and McKernan have been posting regularly about their study, their conversations with the publisher, and how it turns out the person trying to get their study retracted is apparently one of the study’s original peer reviewers and who also happens to have received funding from the same German organization, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, that provided substantial funding to BioNTech. Go figure.
Behind each of these attacks is a plain desire to wipe from the record any evidence of vaccine harm and to chill the publication of any future studies that report vaccine harm.
Every scientist who values scientific integrity should publicly denounce these tactics. Anything less is not science. It is ideology.
The Targeted Assassination of Studies Showing Vaccines Cause Injury.pdf
22 August, 2023 – Shock revelations shake global medical establishment as 74% of sudden deaths linked to the toxic killjabs.
Our landmark paper with autopsy evidence (largest ever) showing 74% of sudden deaths post COVID-19 vaccination were caused by the vaccines, was censored within 24 hours by a top medical journal! (Lancet)
LATEST NEWS (I am a co-author and adjudicator): The paper is cur- rently on the Zenodo server (Swiss server operated by CERN — European Organization for Nuclear Research) It currently has over 79,000 downloads and 95,000 views. (zenodo.org/record/8120771)
1 June, 2023 – Did Karlstad et al. show existence of myocarditis in 23 million Nordic residents after the mRNA technology based gene injection? Yes! Participants were obtained from linked nationwide health registers
in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden; both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis; highest in males 16-24, post 2nd dose
24 May, 2023 – ‘More Vaccine Doses Linked to Higher Rate of Infant Mortality’; Multiple vaccines administered concurrently have also been shown to increase mortality.
In all nations, a causal relationship between vaccines and sudden infant deaths is rarely acknowledged. Yet, physiological studies have provided biological plausibility by showing that infant vaccines can cause serious health conditions.
May 19, 2023 – Subramanian et al. reported that increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States; IMO, this was a very wrong interpretation
” The Subramanian et al. graph itself was showing an association, once interpreted optimally.” “One may deduce that not only is it not true that there is no relation between the two variables in [1], as their title states, or that the association is “marginal”; indeed, there is a very strong positive association.”
