New World Order: Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

 

Digital ID- UN Sustainable Development Agenda 16

 

The United Nations seemed like such a profound step towards all nations collaborating together democratically to navigate planet earth forward to a utopian future of peace and harmony.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG ‘s) appear as seventeen libertarian steps towards a bright future for all people and life forms.

Behind the flowery marketing front, however, lies a dark side to the UN reflected in the New World Order Goals.

UN officials are not democratically elected. The UN is governed , in the Fabian tradition, by a “body of experts.” appointed by the executive branch of national governments and not by the people.

The veto powers of the five permanent members of the UN security Council – China, France, Russia, United kingdom and United States, can cancel the adoption of any resolution, regardless of the level of international support.

The UN and associated self-appointed bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO)  and the World Economic Forum (WEF) want a top-down centralized One World Government.

Intergovernmental organizations are in natural conflict with the co-operative and self-organizing nature of humanity who organize according to bottom-up rather than top-down structures.

 

4 February, 2022 – Fabian Society: Roots, theory and practice of socialist think tank

The Fabians wanted to fulfill the goal of a New World Order of the Hermetics, but they believed that people would change with reforms, not a revolution as Marx had claimed. In fact, as they wanted to establish socialism under capital control, they aimed to impose socialism not only on the working class but also on the capitalists. To achieve this goal of changing society, they would advise governments, especially in the field of education, and change society through them.

In 1910, the Fabians commissioned a glass painting for the headquarters of the Fabian Society. The top of the glass read, “Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire.” This phrase is taken from a rubai (quatrain) by the Iranian poet Omar Khayyam, who is claimed to be Ismaili like Hassan-i Sabbah, the founder of the Order of Assassins, and refers to shattering and then reshaping the world. The bottom of the painting shows the Fabians building a new world with their hammers. The most striking thing in this depiction on the glass is the wolf logo of the society dressed in lambskin. The logo almost reminds one of the passage from the Bible: “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”                                                                                              

Fabians also established the financial arm of the international government, which was a big step toward a single global state. British economist John Maynard Keynes was one of its greatest contributors.  Working on the economic issues of the New World Order, Keynes wished for the establishment of a common bank and monetary unit for the whole world. He had a large role in the convening of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference in 1944, which is also known as the Bretton Woods Conference and resulted in the establishment of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF).

 

Net Zero – a Trojan Horse for Nuclear Power

Global ‘Green Energy’ policies toward Net Zero focus on reducing and eliminating so-called ‘fossil fuels’ while subsidizing ‘renewables such as wind and solar power.

Policy makers are aware that wind and solar rely on baseload back-up of fossil fuels. Without fossil fuels, the push is for nuclear power as the only viable and reliable baseload power.

On the other hand, China and India are expanding coal power production. 

Is nuclear your preferred baseload power in the future?

Gone are the days of the Greens ‘Solar Not Nuclear’ mantra – always a false, and unworkable option. 

Coal, oil, and gas have provided stable, reliable, and cheap energy, but are now demonized as polluting and responsible for a large part of man-made ‘climate change’. However anthropogenic climate change is not the main driver. Natural cycles have shown that temperature and climate variation has been most significant prior to the industrial revolution. 

Nuclear power on the other hand is being re-branded as ‘clean and green’, and with ‘newer technologies’, as ‘safe’.

Apparently the incidents of Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island and the current Ukraine Nuclear facility threats are not to be considered as relevant. Waste disposal is rarely discussed.

Whole/cycle cost benefit analyses of nuclear power, taking in energy inputs and financial outputs, need to be done and considered by truly independent experts with no conflicts of interests. 

Transitioning  from Fossil Fuels to Nuclear Power is an ‘out of the frying pan into the fire’ scenario that is being driven by the ultra-wealthy elites’ obsession with centralizing control of every aspect of our lives including energy production. A false climate change apocalypse narrative is the driver towards both Net Zero and the ‘Nuclear Solution’. 

 

Research/Articles:

4 March, 2024 – Juice: Why Wind and Solar Make Our Power Grid Less Reliable

Politicians and activists tell how “renewable” energy will save us from the climate “crisis.” They don’t tell us about the real costs of green power.

2022 – The Nuclear Option

“Climate change is the existential threat!” warns Bernie Sanders and others. But if he really believed that, he should support nuclear — the only technology that has a track record of rapidly replacing fossil fuels

10 September, 2023 – Households Face £2,300 Bills to Decommission Gas Grid Under Net-Zero Plans

Households face an estimated bill of £2,300 each to shut down Britain’s gas grid as part of the Government’s drive towards Net Zero, a leaked draft of an official report suggests.

The cost of decommissioning the grid could reach a total of £65 billion, according to a draft National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) report.

It is the first time a public body has examined the future of the 176,000-mile network of buried pipes, which serves eight in ten homes but risks becoming obsolete under plans to reach Net Zero carbon emissions.

25 August, 2023 – Don’t believe the renewables myth. Wind and solar are not cheap

– Consumers pay the wholesale price, plus a network cost (including congestion costs), plus a balancing cost, plus a subsidy cost, plus the retailer/supplier operating costs, plus some profits for everyone in the chain from the generator to the network owner to the network operator to the retailer. And then some taxes on top.
– And to hit net zero the whole electrical system – expanded renewables, expanded grid, backup fossil, balancing, subsidies, curtailment payments and all – will have to be expanded to multiple times its current size, as fossil fuels used directly in such things as heating and transport are replaced with electricity.
– Anyone who thinks all this is going to mean cheaper energy is dreaming.

25 August, 2023 – Opening the gates Ideas for an even greater country   

As the war for Australia’s energy future heats up, Gina Rinehart has come out strongly in favour of a nuclear future. Writing in the leading article of the Spectator Australia this week, Rinehart says, ‘It’s time to realise we need nuclear power in this country. Instead of punishing many farmers with bird-killing wind generators and massive solar panel stretches, we need to urgently allow clean, safe, nuclear energy for the well-being of this nation.’

 

15 July, 2023 – NANO Nuclear Energy Inc  is an emerging micro-Small Modular Reactor (µSMR) and Advanced Nuclear Reactor (ANR) technology company led by a world class nuclear engineering team developing smaller, cheaper and safer advanced portable carbon free energy solutions utilizing proprietary novel reactor designs. NANO Nuclear is committed to incorporating the latest technology into its own proprietary novel reactor designs, intellectual properties, and research methods. NANO Nuclear’s subsidiary, HALEU Energy Fuel Inc, will focus on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry and providing fuel to power NANO Nuclear reactors. NANO Nuclear’s  products in technical development are “ZEUS”, a solid core battery reactor, and “ODIN”, a low-pressure coolant reactor, each of which represent advanced developments in portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear micro reactors.

24 June, 2022 – Climate Scientist Says Humans Cause Less Than 0.05°C of Global Warming and Warns of “Anarchy” From “Delusional” Net Zero Policies

With Germany scouring the world for supplies of oil and gas and firing up dormant coal power stations, one of its most distinguished atmospheric scientists, Professor Hermann Harde, has castigated politicians for reacting to increasingly shrill climate horror stories and “believing they can save the world”. Many of the research studies and “horror scenarios” are not based on a secure physical foundation, he says, “but rather represent computer games that reflect what was fed in”. The idea that humans can control the climate with their COemissions is said to be an “absolute delusion”.

14 April, 2023 – Allister Heath: Net Zero is a Trojan horse for the total destruction of Western society

Prepare for a people’s revolution against policies that will abolish choice and impoverish millions

26 June, 2023 – Sweden just scrapped their “Renewable Energy Targets”. Here’s why.

Sweden’s parliament on Tuesday (20 June) adopted a new energy target, giving the right-wing government the green light to push forward with plans to build new nuclear plants in a country that voted 40 years ago to phase out atomic power. Changing the target to “100% fossil-free” electricity, from “100% renewable” is key to the government’s plan to […] reach net zero emissions by 2045.

 

NET ZERO A BIG ZERO?

31 March, 2023 – The provision of energy without fear

Prominent Oxford physicist Professor Wade Allison has called for society to urgently reassess the risks and benefits of nuclear energy.

In a note published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Professor Allison (University of Oxford)  says that because of the weaknesses of solar and wind power, nuclear is the only energy technology that can offer society a positive future.

27 June, 2022 – We have to ‘move to nuclear’ because we ‘need a baseload power’

Entrepreneur Dick Smith says renewables are “too intermittent” to run a whole country on them.

“Look there’s a claim at the moment which is made by the CSIRO here and AEMO, the Australian Energy Market Operator,” Mr Smith told Sky News host Chris Kenny.

“They say that renewables, they say that wind and solar with storage, is cheaper than coal.

“Now, it’s not true – and because of that lie, and it’s a lie, we’re going to delay moving to something that we have to move to which is nuclear because you need a baseload power.”

https://fb.watch/dVZ1uUv6Ju/

Above image https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Global-Temperature-and-CO2-levels-over-600-million-years-Source-MacRae-2008_fig1_280548391

 

A full semester in 40 minutes – David Seigel 

June 16, 2022 – Living in the Windless Dark, Part I: The Renewable Big Picture

No matter how excited you are about renewables, you must still do the math

23 June, 2022 – Living in the Windless Dark, Part II: Let’s do the Math

Being an environmentalist means doing cost/benefit calculations

30 June, 2022 – Living in the Windless Dark, Part III: The Minerals Needed

We must destroy the planet to save it

 

Landmark: Supreme Court Deals Massive Blow To Climate Change Agenda

 

 

Dutch Farmers Told To Kill Off 30% Of Their Livestock To Save Planet

 

 

 

Smallpox Vaccination: Fraud, Force and Folly

 

 

Smallpox Deaths UK 1838 – 1922

 

Historically, smallpox and polio were considered undeniable proof that vaccines worked, but were we told the truth?  

From the graph above, the data shows:

So is there another explanation for why these diseases disappeared?  The history of smallpox vaccination policy has been driven by ongoing fraud, force and folly.

 

Fraud:

Edward Jenner (1749-1823) is credited as the founding father of smallpox vaccination. He documented 23 cases where people who presented with what was diagnosed as cow pox, were later inoculated with smallpox, and appeared not to get the disease.

There was no comparative control group who didn’t get the inoculation. 

Jenner’s claims were based on slender experimental evidence and some of the information presented was incomplete and misleading. 

Lifelong immunity from smallpox was initially claimed. However, as smallpox occurred prominently among the vaccinated, re-vaccination was then implemented after seven years. By 1914, this “immunity” period was shortened to 6-12 months! 

 

Smallpox Deaths, Leicester, UK, 1872 –  1922 vs smallpox vaccination coverage 

 

The greatest smallpox epidemic in Leicester (1870- 1874),  coincided exactly with the period of greatest vaccination.  Smallpox deaths declined thereafter even as vaccination rates plummeted. 

On 23rd March 1885, what became known as the Great Demonstration against compulsory vaccination took place in Leicester, UK. The march of 100,000 people stretched for two miles.

That same year, the Leicester government was replaced with a new government opposing compulsory Vaccination. By 1887 vaccination coverage rate dropped to 10%.

 

 

“After this evidence that smallpox vaccination didn’t work, the people of Leicester in the English midlands refused to have the vaccine any more. When the next smallpox epidemic struck in the early 1890s the people of Leicester relied upon good sanitation and a system of quarantine. There was only one death from smallpox in Leicester during that epidemic. In contrast the citizens of other towns (who had been vaccinated) died in vast numbers…Doctors and drug companies may not like it but the truth is that surveillance, quarantine and better living conditions got rid of smallpox – not the smallpox vaccine.” – Dr. Vernon Coleman, MB

 

So how was the fraud maintained? A person who was vaccinated and then came down with the disease that they were supposedly “protected” against, was simply recorded under another name. From 1904 to 1934 in England and Wales, 3,112 died of chicken pox and 579 died of smallpox according to the health records. In other words, people who have been vaccinated for smallpox and had later come down with the disease were classified in the health records as having chickenpox.

Using this strategy, the WHO started its campaign to eradicate smallpox in 1958, in the same year they named an infectious disease monkeypox. According to the WHO, the disease was clinically indistinguishable from smallpox. This correlates well with the findings of George Bernard Shaw:

 

 

Monkeypox is still an active disease today. By claiming a monkey could be a vector they hid the fact that the smallpox could be the cause of the infection. This was the basic framework for the Global Smallpox Eradication Campaign. Over the past 20 years ten Central and West African countries have reported that monkeypox cases have risen exponentially.

The last reported case  of death from smallpox, was the medical photographer,  Janet Parker, in 1978. Conspiracy surrounds the case. Her father died of a heart attack in quarantine. Her mother supposedly contracted smallpox after being vaccinated and the head of the lab, were Janet had been employed, committed suicide by cutting his own throat. As a result of this case, the WHO instructed labs to destroy their smallpox stock.  It was suggested that the existence of these labs posed a threat to the success of the Global Smallpox Eradication Campaign. 

The WHO has subsequently used the myth, that smallpox had been eradicated, to give credentials to the whole vaccine program worldwide. Most people now believe that vaccines have saved us from the most dreaded infectious diseases. They have no idea that the real decline in infectious disease deaths was due almost entirely to improved sanitation, clean drinking water, nutrition and higher living standards. 

 


 

Force

In the UK in 1840, as doctors and citizens realized that smallpox vaccination was not what it was promised to be, vaccine refusals increased. Governments passed various laws to force people to be vaccinated. 

The United Kingdom Vaccination Act 1853 made it compulsory for all children born after 1 August 1853 to be vaccinated against smallpox during their first 3 months of life. Parents who failed to get their children vaccinated would be subject to a fine.

In Leicester the number of prosecutions for non-vaccination grew from two in 1869 to 3,000 in 1884.  Fines were fiercely enforced. Police collecting a fine from one Arthur Ward threatened his pregnant wife with prison. The argument sent her into premature labor and the child was stillborn. 

The compulsory vaccination law was repealed in 1907. By 1919, England and Wales had become one of the least vaccinated countries and had only 28 deaths from smallpox out of a population of 37.8 million people.

According to official figures of the Registrar General of England, 109 children under five years in England and Wales died of smallpox between 1910 and 1933. In that same period 270 died from vaccination. 

Massachusetts, USA, in 1855, took the most advanced stand ever taken by any of the states and enacted a law which required parents or guardians to cause the vaccination of all children before they were two years old, and forbade the admission of all children to the public schools of any child who had not been duly vaccinated.  Parents who did not vaccinate their children by age 2 faced a fine of $5 yearly (about $156 in today’s dollars). 

New Jersey, 1906, 30,000 pupils and teachers were forced to submit to vaccination. Twenty teachers and hundreds of pupils who refused, were suspended. Many of those vaccinated became seriously ill. 

 

To maintain the prestige of the medical profession and themselves, the government put the full force of their powers to legislate compulsory vaccination.  They used public funds and the power of the police to enforce inoculations on the unwilling and defenseless. 

 

Folly 

“Smallpox vaccination has always correlated positively to epidemics in the countries that collected data in the vain hope of proving the vaccine’s worth.”  Dissolving Illusions” by Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk

In Leicester, UK, reports of deaths and outbreaks created doubts about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. There was a growing list of complications attributed to vaccination. The 1871-72 smallpox epidemic provided a vivid example to the townspeople, as some 3,000 cases occurred and of these 358 died. Some of those dead had been vaccinated according to the law.

In Boston, the same situation was occurring.  Massachusetts data began in 1811 and showed that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics. Following the 1855 mandates, there were smallpox epidemics in 1859–1860, 1864–1865, and 1867, culminating with the infamous epidemic in 1872–1873. These repeated smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts had no beneficial effect. 

 

Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1811 to 1926.

 

Smallpox Statistics We Were Meant to Forget:

From the beginning of the 20th century in England we find that there were similar numbers of vaccine-induced deaths to smallpox deaths, except in the case of children under 5 yrs of age, where the vaccine proved much riskier than smallpox itself. 

1911-13: Comparison of smallpox and vaccination deaths.

  • Smallpox deaths = 42,                                                    Sp. vaccination deaths = 31.
  • Smallpox deaths in children under 5 yrs = 8,       Sp. vaccination deaths = 30

 

Smallpox vaccines were proving themselves to be neither safe nor effective. Epidemics were increasing in severity in the wake of vaccination. Correspondingly, they were decreasing as vaccination rates declined.  Improved living conditions were having a better effect and had all but wiped smallpox out. 

With exquisite irony, a 1972 smallpox outbreak in Yugoslavia was halted through use of the Leicester Method. This involved rapid quarantining of cases and contacts, as well as, cleaning of the houses.  – while the authorities vaccinated 18 million citizens in full knowledge of its ineffectiveness. Vaccination had to be implemented if the story of ‘vaccine success’ was to be upheld. 

The folly was always, the belief that you could safely inject some infective agent, of highly dubious toxicity, into the body of a healthy individual, or a really seriously unhealthy individual. This was to prevent, or mitigate the severity of, an illness that was already reportedly mild in most developed nations, or in many countries non-existent.

The risk of contracting the illness had to be outweighed against the risk of the vaccine. Taking the vaccine into your system, exposed you to all the potential side effects, including serious injury and death. 

The only way this scenario could ever be accepted was to deny alternative methods and alternative policies,  censor any knowledge of adverse events, and ‘discover’ an illness almost identical, and name it ‘monkeypox’. 

 

The legacy of the smallpox story lives on in our understanding and acceptance of vaccines today. “Vaccines save lives and adverse events are rare” still frames the belief system driving vaccine compliance.

 

Vaccination programs and anti­biotics have mistakenly been given all the credit for  declines in killer diseases such as smallpox, cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, dysentery, etc. Most or all of the credit belongs to better hygiene, sanitation, hous­ing, and greater resistance to disease thanks to improved economic conditions and better nutrition. 

In fact, many keen observers commented that it may have been because of how OBVIOUS it had become that the smallpox vaccines were spreading smallpox, that the WHO (World Health Organization)  was motivated to cease the vaccination program but credit it for the eradication!

 

Has smallpox been eradicated? Was it eradicated from laboratories? What does Bill Gates say about the global future of  smallpox?

6 November, 2021 – Bill Gates warns terrorists will try and use smallpox as a biological weapon as he bids for billions in funding to prevent future pandemics

5 November, 2021 – Video – Bill Gates warns of “bioterrorist smallpox pandemic”  

 

 

Why No affordable medicines? only Vaccines! Part 3

 

Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and Azithromycin are inexpensive as their patents have expired and are available generically. Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, are non-patentable. No mega profits to be made here. Access is denied or severely limited

 

Senator Malcolm Roberts questions John Skerrit of the TGA*:

*Therapeutic Goods Administration

(Malcolm Roberts)“.. the vaccine only has provisional approval. Is it true that provisional approval is only possible where there are no approved pharmaceutical treatments available?

(John Skerritt), Deputy Secretary, Health Products Regulation, also responsible for the TGA Therapeutic Goods Administration: “So, TGA, unlike the U.S. and the UK, for example, did a provisional approval of vaccines as opposed to an emergency use authorization.”

(Malcolm Roberts) “Thank you. Ivermectin is an antiviral that’s been proven safe in 3.6 billion human doses over 60 years. It’s now demonstrating success in treating COVID internationally, including in certain Indian states that are performing far better than the other states without it.”

(John Skerritt) “Senator, we have not received a submission for Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID.”.. “Now, if you go to the broader community including the company that is the main originator company that is a sponsor of Ivermectin, they do not believe that the overwhelming balance of evidence actually supports that Ivermectin being effective in the prophylaxis or prevention or the treatment of COVID.”

 

This appears at odds with other evidence:

26 August, 2021 – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT IGNORES TRIPLE THERAPY “COVID-19” CURE – IVERMECTIN, DOXYCYCLINE & ZINC!

 20 August, 2021 – Australian MP Craig Kelly Interviews Dr. Brian Tyson 

19 August, 2020 – Australian GPs Can Legally Prescribe Ivermectin Triple Therapy Protocol — Professor Thomas Borody

24 June, 2020 – ‘It’s crystal clear’ Professor Robert Clancy backs ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment – Drive – ABC Radio: 

 

 

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 62 studies

 

One Page Summary of the Clinical Trials Evidence for Ivermectin in COVID-19

 

DR.PIERRE KORY’S SENATE TESTIMONY ON EARLY COVID-19 TREATMENTS (Video)

 

The governments have entered enormous purchasing contracts with pharmaceutical conglomerates such as Pfizer BionTech and Astrazeneca.

We have  unprecedented experimental worldwide jabs being rolled out. There is no unbiased  data on safety and efficacy to inform consent! 

 Governments have thwarted any known medicines for Covid-19.  The priority has been given for ‘Emergency Use‘ or ‘Provisional Use‘ vaccine’ registration and rollout. Approval could only be given, according to the registration criteria, if no other treatment or prophylaxis existed.

 

And that’s not all!:

If you were wondering why Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed, it is because the agreement that countries have with Pfizer do not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID-19, the contract cannot be voided.”             America’s Frontline Doctors

The US pharma company is reportedly asking some South American countries for military bases and sovereign assets as guarantee for vaccines.

 

 

It looks like the TGA and FDA have approved Vaccines for prevention, and allowed Monoclonal Antibodies for treatment at over a $1000 a dose.

 Not surprisingly the off-patent preventatives and treatments are not approved because there is no new money to be made.

 

It appears that the medical-industrial-complex’s  end-game is to build a concept that vaccination occurs right throughout life  from cradle to grave.  

 

There are far more humanitarian goals:

Provide open access to all medical and health options for prevention and treatment of Covid-19 and subsequent viral conditions.

All families and individuals are encouraged and supported to make truly informed choices without coercion or force.

 

Further information: 

Ivermectin for Covid-19

 

Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19

 

Covid-19 – Existing treatments and prevention

 

The Palmer Foundation