{"id":1138,"date":"2023-04-14T10:25:50","date_gmt":"2023-04-14T10:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pro-informedchoice.com\/blog\/?p=1138"},"modified":"2025-07-01T06:06:17","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T06:06:17","slug":"net-zero-is-a-trojan-horse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pro-informedchoice.com\/blog\/index.php\/2023\/04\/14\/net-zero-is-a-trojan-horse\/","title":{"rendered":"Net Zero – a Trojan Horse for Nuclear Power"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h4>\n

14 September, 2022 – Is Net Zero Emissions the Trojan Horse for Society?<\/a><\/h4>\n

The wealthy countries continue to focus on subsidizing intermittent electricity from breezes and sunshine while simultaneously shuttering coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants that have been providing continuous uninterruptible electricity.\u00a0 \u00a0The Trojan Horse results are extreme costs, painful reductions in living standards for all but the richest, national weakness, and societal instability.<\/span><\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Net Zero – a Trojan Horse for Nuclear Power<\/span><\/h2>\n

Global ‘Green Energy’ policies toward Net Zero focus on reducing and eliminating so-called ‘fossil fuels’ while subsidizing ‘renewables such as wind and solar power. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Policy makers are aware that wind and solar rely on baseload back-up of fossil fuels. Without fossil fuels, the push is for nuclear power as the only viable and reliable baseload power. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

On the other hand, China and India are expanding coal power production.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Is nuclear your preferred baseload power in the future? <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Gone are the days of the Greens ‘Solar Not Nuclear’ mantra – always a false, and unworkable option.\u00a0 <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Coal, oil, and gas have provided stable, reliable, and cheap energy, but are now demonized as polluting and responsible for a large part of man-made ‘climate change’. However anthropogenic climate change is not the main driver. Natural cycles have shown that temperature and climate variation has been most significant prior to the industrial revolution.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Nuclear power on the other hand is being re-branded as ‘clean and green’, and with ‘newer technologies’, as ‘safe’. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Apparently the incidents of Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island and the\u00a0 Ukraine and Iran Nuclear facility military threats are not to be considered as relevant. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Waste disposal is rarely discussed. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Whole\/cycle cost benefit analyses of nuclear power, taking in energy inputs and financial outputs, need to be done and considered by truly independent experts with no conflicts of interests.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Transitioning\u00a0 from Fossil Fuels to Nuclear Power is an ‘out of the frying pan into the fire’ scenario that is being driven by the ultra-wealthy elites’ obsession with centralising control of every aspect of our lives including energy production. A false climate change apocalypse narrative is the driver towards both Net Zero and the ‘Nuclear Solution’.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/h3>\n

Videos:\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n